PL EN


2016 | 6 | 1 | 19-41
Article title

The role of extensive recasts in error detection and correction by adult ESL students

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Most of the laboratory studies on recasts have examined the role of intensive recasts provided repeatedly on the same target structure. This is different from the original definition of recasts as the reformulation of learner errors as they occur naturally and spontaneously in the course of communicative interaction. Using a within-group research design and a new testing methodology (video-based stimulated correction posttest), this laboratory study examined whether extensive and spontaneous recasts provided during smallgroup work were beneficial to adult L2 learners. Participants were 26 ESL learners, who were divided into seven small groups (3-5 students per group), and each group participated in an oral activity with a teacher. During the activity, the students received incidental and extensive recasts to half of their errors; the other half of their errors received no feedback. Students’ ability to detect and correct their errors in the three types of episodes was assessed using two types of tests: a stimulated correction test (a video-based computer test) and a written test. Students’ reaction time on the error detection portion of the stimulated correction task was also measured. The results showed that students were able to detect more errors in error+recast (error followed by the provision of a recast) episodes than in error-recast (error and no recast provided) episodes (though this difference did not reach statistical significance). They were also able to successfully and partially successfully correct more errors in error+recast episodes than in error-recast episodes, and this difference was statistically significant on the written test. The reaction time results also point towards a benefit from recasts, as students were able to complete the task (slightly) more quickly for error+recast episodes than for error-recast episodes.
Contributors
author
References
  • Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
  • Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (Eds.). (1993). Tasks and language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dilans, G. (2010). Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 787-816.
  • Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). ‘Information gap tasks’: An aid to second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305-325.
  • Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281-318.
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
  • Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.
  • Farrar, M. (1990). Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 17, 607-624.
  • Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127-165.
  • Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-72.
  • Havranek, G. (1999). The effectiveness of corrective feedback: Preliminary results of an empirical study. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangere, 2, 189-206.
  • Hawkes, L. (2007). Recasts revisited: The role of recasts in error detection and correction by adult ESL students. (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Victoria, Victoria BC, Canada.
  • Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form–te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311-94.
  • Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
  • Johnson, K. (1981). The four skills in communicative language teaching: Writing. In K. Johnson & K. Morrow (Eds.), Communication in the classroom (pp. 93-107). London: Longman.
  • Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
  • Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
  • Lochtman, K. (2002). Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 271-283.
  • Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361-386.
  • Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
  • Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 259- 278). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
  • Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
  • Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
  • Long, M. H. (2006). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
  • Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 37-66.
  • Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
  • Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2012). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40.
  • Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405-30.
  • Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
  • McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720.
  • Nabei, T., & Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student’s second language learning. Language Awareness, 11(1), 43-63.
  • Nassaji, H. (2006, July). Explicitness of interactional feedback and its role in the learning of the targeted form in student-teacher interaction. Paper presented at the Pacific Second Language Research Forum (PacSLRF), Brisbane, Australia.
  • Nassaji, H. (2007). Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 57, 511-548.
  • Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59, 411-452.
  • Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Nassaji, H. & Hawkes, L. (2006, October). Focus-on-form in L2 classrooms and the role of language proficiency. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
  • Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-395.
  • Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
  • Sabbagh, S. (1998). Learners’ reactions to feedback in an adult ESL classroom (Unpublished master’s thesis). Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA, USA.
  • Saito, K. (2013). The acquisitioned value of recasts in instructed second language speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /?/ to adult Japanese learners. Language Learning, 63, 499-529.
  • Saxton, M. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139-161.
  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
  • Schmidt, R. (Ed.). (1995). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu, Hawai’i: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361-392.
  • Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. New York: Springer.
  • Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-470e2787-c551-4648-b860-c20c73f6ccce
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.