PL EN


2018 | 31 | 114-131
Article title

Sino-Indian Standoff on the Doklam plateau

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
In the summer of 2017, the armies of the two most populous nations of the world stood eye-to-eye, seemingly without any preceding cause, on the Doklam plateau, the ownership of which is disputed by both Bhutan and China. The aim of this paper is to place this episode in the context of Sino-Indian relations, assessing its repercussions for their shared future as two neighbouring nuclear powers, as well as for their past, keeping in mind the lasting scars and consequences of the Sino-Indian War of 1962, which was caused by similar reasons. We will search for the answers to the following questions: how was this border dispute similar or different than the one 55 years before? What effect did the then-approaching 19th Party Congress have on the decisions of Beijing and Xi Jinping ? What was the reason of the sudden assertiveness of the Indian side ? What did Bhutan, the third party, think about the dispute, stuck between the two Asian giants? And meanwhile, where was the United States of America ?
Keywords
Year
Issue
31
Pages
114-131
Physical description
Dates
published
2018-12-01
Contributors
author
  • Eötvös Loránd University. Faculty of Humanities
References
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Simon Denyer, Annie Gowen, ‘Who blinked in the China-India military standoff ?’, 30 August 2017,
  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/08/30/who-blinked-in-china-india-military-standoff/, (accessed 01. 03. 2018.)
  • Ádám Róma, Sino-Indian Relations Since the Second World War - From Panchsheel to the Sino-Indian War of 1962 - Deterioration of Relations, BA Dissertation, Eötvös Lóránd University, 2016, p.52.
  • Gen. Deepak Kapoor, ‘Chinese Provocation: Is India Prepared ?’, 3 May 2013, http://www.facenfacts.com/NewsDetails/38459/chinese-provocation:-is-india-prepared?.htm, (accessed 01.03.2018.)
  • Chinese built a base in a disputed area, then the Indians did the same, the incident lasted three weeks.
  • A standoff for two weeks, because of a Chinese road-building plan, the conflict ended with concessions from both sides.
  • At the Nathu La and Cho La passes.
  • Jawaharlal Nehru, ‘Prime Minister Nehru’s Letter to Chou En-lai’, 26 September 1959.
  • Brian Benedictus, ‘Bhutan and the Great Power Tussle’, 2 August 2014, https://web.archive.org/web/20151222212344/http:/thediplomat.com/2014/08/bhutan-and-the-great-power-tussle/, (accessed 01.03.2018.)
  • Pillalamarri Akhilesh, Subanthore Aswin, ‘What Do the Bhutanese People Think About Doklam ?’, 14 August 2017, https://web.archive.org/web/20170929185502/https:/thediplomat.com/2017/08/what-do-the-bhutanese-people-think-about-doklam/, (accessed 01.03.2018.)
  • Chaudhuri Rudra, ‘Looking for Godot’, 3 September 2017, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/looking-for-godot-doklam-standoff-india-china-bhutan-neighbours/lite/, (accessed 01.03.2018.)
  • Ankit Panda, ‘The Political Geography of the India-China Crisis at Doklam’, 13 July 2017, https://web.archive.org/web/20170714232229/http:/thediplomat.com/2017/07/the-political-geography-of-the-india-china-crisis-at-doklam/, (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Dipanjan Roy Chaudhury, ‘Doklam discussed, Pakistan skipped: Here’s what happened at the 1 hour meet between Xi and Modi’, 5 September 2017, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/doklam-discussed-pakistan-skipped-heres-what-happened-at-the-1-hour-meet-between-xi-and-modi/articleshow/60372716.cms, (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Brian Benedictus, ‘Bhutan and the Great Power Tussle’, 2 August 2014, https://web.archive.org/web/20151222212344/http:/thediplomat.com/2014/08/bhutan-and-the-great-power-tussle/, (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Denyer and Gowen, 2017.
  • Brian Benedictus, ‘Bhutan and the Great Power Tussle’, 2 August 2014, https://web.archive.org/web/20151222212344/http:/thediplomat.com/2014/08/bhutan-and-the-great-power-tussle/, (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End ?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01.03.2018.).
  • Joshi Manoj, Doklam: To start at the very beginning, ORF Special Report, Observer Research Foundation, 2017, http://www.orfonline.org/research/doklam-start-very-beginning/ (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Brian Benedictus, ‘Bhutan and the Great Power Tussle’, 2 August 2014, https://web.archive.org/web/20151222212344/http:/thediplomat.com/2014/08/bhutan-and-the-great-power-tussle/, (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • ‘The Facts and China’s Position Concerning the Indian Border Troops’ Crossing of the China-India Boundary in the Sikkim Sector into the Chinese Territory.’, Government of China, 2017.
  • “Bhutan-China Border Mismatch”, 1 January 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20170810053429/http:/www.bhutannewsservice.org/bhutan-china-border-mismatch/. (access: 01.03.2018).
  • Ankit Panda, ‘What’s Driving the India-China Standoff at Doklam ?’, 18 July 2017https://thediplomat.com/2017/07/whats-driving-the-india-china-standoff-at-doklam/ (accessed 01. 03. 2018).
  • Dashed arrow on the map.
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End ?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01. 03. 2018).
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End ?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01. 03. 2018).
  • Joshi Manoj, ‘Doklam: To start at the very beginning’, ORF Special Report. Observer Research Foundation, 2017.
  • Steven Lee Myers, Ellen Barry, Max Fisher, ‘How India and China Have Come to the Brink Over a Remote Mountain Pass’, 26 July 2017,https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.html (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Stone-Pelting at Lake Pangong: India, China Border Tensions Under the Spotlight’, 21 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/stone-pelting-at-lake-pangong-india-china-border-tensions-under-the-spotlight/ (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Fedrika Allison, ‘China and India may be on a path to war’, 5 August 2017, https://web.archive.org/web/20170810052011/http:/uk.businessinsider.com/china-and-india-and-doklam-2017-8?r=US&IR=T (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Chandran Nyshka, ‘Racist video from China’s official press agency mocks Indians’, 17 August 2017,https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/17/chinese-media-xinhua-mocks-indians-and-pm-narendra-modis-policies-in-racist-video.html (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • “The Facts and China’s Position…"
  • Fedrika, 2017.
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End ?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01. 03. 2018).
  • “The Facts and China’s Position…"
  • Joshi Manoj, ‘Doklam: To start at the very beginning’, ORF Special Report. Observer Research Foundation, 2017.
  • Tenzing Lamsang, ‘The Third Leg of Doklam’, 8 May 2017, http://thebhutanese.bt/the-third-leg-of-doklam-2/ (accessed 03.01.2018).
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End ?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01. 03. 2018).
  • Jha Tilak, ‘China and its Peripheries: Limited Objectives in Bhutan’, Issue Brief, No. 233, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, 2013.
  • Fedrika, 2017.
  • Jeffrey Gettleman, Javier Hernández, ‘China and India Agree to Ease Tensions in Border Dispute’, 28 August 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/28/world/asia/china-india-standoff-withdrawal.html (accessed 01.03.2018.).
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End ?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01. 03. 2018).
  • Gettleman, Hernández, 2017.
  • Denyer, Gowen, 2017.
  • Fravel M. Taylor, ‘Why India Did Not ‘Win’ the Standoff with China’, 1 September 2017, https://warontherocks.com/2017/09/why-india-did-not-win-the-standoff-with-china/ (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Ankit Panda, ‘Disengagement at Doklam: Why and How Did the India-China Standoff End ?’, 29 August 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/disengagement-at-doklam-why-and-how-did-the-india-china-standoff-end/ (accessed 01. 03. 2018).
  • Fedrika, 2017.
  • ‘Ready to maintain peace with India: China on Sitharaman’s visit to Nathu La’, Press Trust of India, 9 October 2017, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/ready-to-maintain-peace-at-frontiers-with-india-china-on-sitharaman-s-visit-to-nathu-la/story-EVdlopKMXl0rkre9mRlzqM.html (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Chaudhury, 2017.
  • ‘Doklam standoff: Indian, Chinese troops still on face-off site, they have merely stepped back 150 meters each’ , FE Online, 7 September 2017,
  • http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/doklam-standoff-indian-chinese-troops-still-on-face-off-site-they-have-merely-stepped-back-150-meters-each/844812/ (accessed 01.03.2018).
  • Press Trust of India, 2017.
  • Brahma Chellaney, ‘Asia’s New Entente’, 3 November 2017, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/asia-power-balance-china-tillerson-speech-by-brahma-chellaney-2017-11 (accessed 01.03.2018).
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-47cb485c-7438-430c-a91b-8ceb3e1bc43a
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.