PL EN


2020 | 3(238) | 5-30
Article title

Demokratyczny elityzm: geneza i podstawy paradygmatu

Content
Title variants
EN
Democratic Elitism: Genesis and Paradigm’s Basis
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
PL
Artykuł prezentuje podstawy współczesnej teorii elit, znanej jako demokratyczny elityzm. Rozpoczyna się od zarysu dyskusji nad elitami w demokracjach w latach sześćdziesiątych i siedemdziesiątych ubiegłego wieku, dającej początki dzisiejszego ujęcia. Następnie zarysowane są zmiany makrospołeczne i makropolityczne w ostatnich dekadach, w tym zmiany w systemach partyjnych, związane silnie z globalizacją i określane ogólnym mianem „nowej polityki”. W zasadniczej części uwaga skupia się na twierdzeniach paradygmatu demokratycznego elityzmu, związanych z relacjami wewnątrz elit i koncepcją „konfiguracji elit” Johna Higleya, która stanowi ważne narzędzie analityczne i w istotny sposób wiąże się z cechami reżimów politycznych i efektywnością demokracji. W zakończeniu podkreślone jest ogólne przesłanie paradygmatu, nakazujące brać pod uwagę zmienne opisujące elity, w przeciwnym bowiem razie wyjaśnienia wynikające z badań będą ignorowały ważne determinanty i w efekcie będą niekompletne.
EN
The article presents the major tenets of the contemporary theory of elites, known as democratic elitism. First, it outlines the discussion on elites in democracies in the 1960. and the 1970., which commenced a contemporary approach in elite studies. Next, a concise summary of „a new politics”, i.e. macrosocial and macropolitical changes triggered off by globalization and transformations within party systems, is presented. The main part of the article focuses on the relations within elites and the John Higley’s concept of “configuration of elites”, which makes up an important analytical tool and is considered a major factor co-determining the shape of political regimes and democratic performance. In the conclusions, the crucial message of the democratic elite paradigm is articulated: elite variables have to be included in academic research, otherwise explanations would miss major determinants and turn out incomplete.
Year
Issue
Pages
5-30
Physical description
Contributors
  • Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN
References
  • Bachrach, Peter. 1967. The Theory of Democratic Elitism. A Critique. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
  • Beetham, David. 1977. From Socialism to Fascism: The Relationship Between Theory and Practice in the Work of Robert Michels. Political Studies, 25: 3–24 (część I) oraz 161–181 (część II).
  • Bennett, R. J. 1978. The Elite Theory as Fascist Ideology: A Replay to Beetham’s Critique of Robert Michels. Political Studies, 26: 474–488.
  • Best, Heinrich. 2010. Associated Rivals: Antagonism and Cooperation in the German Political Elite. In: H. Best, J. Higley, eds. Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 97–116.
  • Best, Heinrich, John Higley. 2010. Introduction: Democratic Elitism Reappraised. In: H. Best, J. Higley, eds. Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 1–22.
  • Best, Heinrich, Ursula Hoffmann-Lange. 2018. Challenged Elites – Elites as Challengers. Toward a Unified Theory of Representative Elites. Historical Social Research, 43: 7–32.
  • Best, Heinrich, John Higley, eds. 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  • Burnham, James. 1943. The Machiavellans. Defenders of Freedom. New York: John Day.
  • Burton, Michael G. 1984. Elites and Collective Protest. The Sociological Quarterly, 25: 45–66.
  • Burton, Michael G., John Higley. 1987. Elite Settlements. American Sociological Review, 52: 295–307.
  • Cammack, Paul. 1990. A Critical Assessment of the New Elite Paradigm. American Sociological Review, 55: 415–420.
  • Clark, Terry, Seymour M. Lipset. 2001. The Breakdown of Class Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Dahl, Robert A. 1966/2010. Further Refl ections on ‘The Elitist Theory of Democracy’. American Political Science Review, 60: 296–305. Przedruk w: P. Bachrach, ed. 2010. Political Elites in a Democracy. New Brunswik and London: Aldine Transaction.
  • Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Dahl, Robert A. 1995. Demokracja i jej krytycy. Przekład Stefan Amsterdamski. Kraków: Znak.
  • Dalton, Russel J., David. M. Farell, Ian McAlister. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organized Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Diamond, Larry. 2002. Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13: 21–35.
  • Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1973. The Study of Conflict in Western Societies: A Critique of the End of Ideology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
  • Domhoff, William G. 1975. The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats. A Study in Ruling-Class Cohesiveness. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
  • Domhoff, William G. 1983. Who Rules America Now? A View for the ‘80s. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Dye, Thomas R. 1983. Who’s Running America? The Reagan Years. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Femia, Joseph. 1993. Mosca Revisited. European Journal of Political Theory, 23: 145–161.
  • Field, Lowell G., John Higley. 1980. Elitism. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Field, Lowell G., John Higley, Michael G. Burton. 1990. A New Elite Framework for Political Sociology. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, XXVIII, 88: 149–182.
  • Gunter, Richard. 1992. Spain: The Very Model of the Modern Elite Settlement. In: J. Higley, R. Gunther, eds. Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–80.
  • Higley, John. 1992. Neo-Elite Theory and Democratic Doctrine: A Comment on Wintrop. Australian Journal of Political Science, 27: 522–526.
  • Higley, John. 2016. The Endangered West. Myopic Elites and Fragile Social Orders in a Threatening World. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
  • Higley, John. 2018. Continuities and Discontinuites in Elite Theory. In: H. Best, J. Higley, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave-Macmillan, 25–39.
  • Higley, John, Michael G. Burton, G. Lowell Field. 1990. In Defense of Elite Theory: A Replay to Cammack. American Sociological Review, 55: 421–426.
  • Higley, John, Richard Gunther, eds. 1992. Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Higley, John, György Lengyel. 2000. Introduction: Elite Configuration after State Socialism. In: J. Higley, G. Lengyel, eds. Elites After State Socialism. Theories and Analysis. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefi eld Publishers, 1–21.
  • Higley, John, Michael Burton. 2006. Elite Foundation of Liberal Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefi eld Publishers.
  • Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula. 2018. Theory-Based Typologies of Political Elites. In: H. Best, J. Higley, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. London: Palgrave-Macmillan, 53–68.
  • Hoffmann-Lange, Ursula, Mindaugas Kuklys. 2019. European Citizens and Elites in Times of Economic Crisis and Citizen Unrest. In: L. Vogel, R. Gebauer, A. Salheiser, eds. The Contested Status of Political Elites. London: Routledge, 58–83.
  • Huber, Robert A., Christian H. Schimpf. 2016. A Drunken Guest in Europe? The Influence of Populist Radical Right Parties on Democratic Quality. Zeitschrift fϋr Vergleichende Politikwisesnschaft, 10: 103–129.
  • Hunter, Floyd. 1953. Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Inglehart, Ronald, Pippa Norris. 2017. Trump and the Populist Authoritarian Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15: 443–454.
  • Karvonen, Lauri. 2010. The Personalization of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Katz, Richard S., Peter Mair. 2018. Democracy and the Cartelization of Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Keller, Suzanne. 1963. Beyond the Ruling Class. Strategic Elites in Modern Society. New York: Random House.
  • Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Ursula Hoffmann-Lange. 2018. The Impact of the Global Economic Crisis on Support for Democracy. Historical Social Research, 43: 164–174. DOI: 10.12759/hsr.43.2018.4.164-174.
  • Körösényi, András. 2012. Monopolistic Competition, Auction and Authorization: a Schumpeterian View of Leadership and the Political Market. Historical Social Research, 37: 57–72.
  • Linz, Juan J., Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Men. New York: Anchor Books.
  • Lipset, Seymour M. 1962. Introduction to Robert Michel’s Political Parties. New York: Collier Books.
  • Mair, Peter. 2009. Representative versus Responsible Government. Max Plank Institute for the Study of Societies Working Paper 09/8.
  • McClosky, Herbert. 1964. Consensus and Ideology in American Politics. American Political Science Review, vol. 58: 361–382.
  • Meisel, James H. 1962. The Myth of the Ruling Class: Gaetano Mosca and the ‘Elite’. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Meisel, James H., ed. 1965. Pareto & Mosca. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Mills, C. Wright. 1956/1961. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press. Polskie wydanie 1961: Elita władzy. Przekład Mieczysław Maneli. Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.
  • Nye, Robert A. 1977. The Anti-Democratic Sources of Elite Theory: Pareto, Mosca, Michels. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Pakulski, Jan. 2012. The Weberian Foundations of Modern Elite Theory and Democratic Elitism. Historical Social Research, 37: 38–56.
  • Pakulski, Jan. 2012a. Introduction: John Higley’s Work on Elite Foundations of Social Theory and Politics. Historical Social Research, 37: 9–20.
  • Pakulski, Jan, Malcolm Waters. 1996. The Death of Class. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
  • Pakulski, Jan, András Körösényi. 2012. Toward Leader Democracy. London, New York, Delhi: Anthem Press.
  • Pareto, Vilfredo. 1994. Uczucia i działania. Fragmenty socjologiczne. Wybór, wstęp i redakcja naukowa Andrzej Kojder. Przekład Monika Dobrowolska, Magdalena Rozpędowska i Anna Zinserling. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Parry, Geraint. 1969. Political Elites. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Piano, Natasha. 2019. Revisiting Democratic Elitism: The Italian School of Elitism, American Political Science and the Problem of Plutocracy. Journal of Politics, 81: 524–538.
  • Poguntke, Thomas, Paul Webb. Eds. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comapartive Studies of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Polsby, Nelson W. 1963. Community Power and Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Putnam, Robert D. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Rahat, Gideon, Ofer Kenig. 2018. From Party Politics to Personalized Politics? Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1962. Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1978. Anti-Elitism Revisited. Government and Opposition, 13: 58–80.
  • Scarrow, Susan E. 2017. The Changing Nature of Political Party Membership. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-226?rskey=dGKEfW&result=2. Dostęp 02.02.2020.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph. 1995. Kapitalizm, socjalizm, demokracja. Przekład Michał Rusiński. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Sniderman, Paul M., Joseph F. Fletcher, Peter H. Russell, Philipe E. Tetlock, Brian J. Gaines. 1991. The Fallacy of Democratic Elitism: Elite Competition and Commitment to Civil Liberties. British Journal of Political Science, 21: 349–370.
  • Stouffer, Samuel. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Garden City: Doubleday.
  • van Biezen, Ingrid, Peter Mair, Thomas Poguntke. 2011. Going, Going … Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51: 24–56.
  • Walker, Jack L. 1966/2010. A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy. American Political Science Review, 60: 285–295. Przedruk w: P. Bachrach, ed. 2010. Political Elites in a Democracy. New Brunswik and London: Aldine Transaction.
  • Wasilewski, Jacek. 2001. Three Elites of the Central-East European Democratization. In: R. Markowski, E. Wnuk-Lipiński, eds. Transformative Paths in Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: Institute of Political Studies and Friedrich Ebert Foundation, 133–142.
  • Weber, Max. 1998. Polityka jako zawód i powołanie. Przekład Andrzej Kopacki, Paweł Dybel. Kraków: Znak.
  • Wintrop, Norman. 1992. Elite Theory and Neo-Elite Theory Understanding of Democracy: An Analysis and Critisism. Australian Journal of Political Science, 27: 462–477.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-49a82d1b-0eab-4902-9c25-858944260b29
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.