Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 1(232) | 25-63

Article title

Otwartość polskiej struktury społecznej: 1982–2016

Content

Title variants

EN
The Openness of Social Structure in Poland: 1982–2016

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Konceptualną ramą badań nad ruchliwością jest teoria modernizacji. Stwierdza się w niej, że wzrost otwartości jest dominującą tendencją, która wynika z postępującej liberalizacji i rozwoju gospodarki rynkowej. Wbrew tym oczekiwaniom bariery ruchliwości okazują się na ogół stabilne. Ustalenia te dotyczyły głównie zachodnich demokracji. Nasza analiza jest kontynuacją tego podejścia w odniesieniu do Polski. Opierając się na danych z lat 1982–2016 wskazujemy, że po pierwsze, dokonuje się systematyczne obniżenie wpływu wykształcenia na pozycję zawodową, co przeciwdziała zwiększaniu się ruchliwości międzypokoleniowej. Po drugie, tendencja ta nie obniżyła jednak tzw. względnych szans ruchliwości, chociaż mogło to być bardziej związane z przekształceniami struktury zawodowej niż ze wzrostem otwartości barier społecznych. Po trzecie, za stabilnym charakterem wzorów ruchliwości przemawia utrzymywanie się nierówności edukacyjnych. Po czwarte, okazuje się, że w odróżnieniu od badań w innych krajach, w przypadku Polski, wyższe wykształcenie nie osłabia, ale raczej wzmacnia znaczenie dziedziczenia pozycji rodziców.
EN
This paper deals with changes in the “openness” of Polish society over a 35-year period, focusing primarily on relative mobility, with some attention to changes in absolute mobility. We disentangle intergenerational occupational association into four interrelated parts: (i) relative mobility defined by the effect of social origin on destination, (ii) the relationship between social origin and education, (iii) the net effect of education on destination, and (iv) the compositional effect of education reflected in the rising share of more educated categories in the social structure. We show that changes in social fluidity were neither systematic nor easily interpretable. While our results reveal a consistently declining association between education and occupational position, unidirectional change could not be identified in the social origin-education link and in relative mobility in terms of the association between origin and destination. The origin-destination association generally increased at higher (rather than lower) educational levels.

Year

Issue

Pages

25-63

Physical description

Contributors

  • Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Insytut Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk

References

  • Agresti, Alan. 2010. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Andorka, Rudolf. 1971. Social Mobility and Economic Development. „Acta Oeconomica” 7 (1).
  • Andorka, Rudolf i Krzysztof Zagórski. 1979. Structural Factors of Social Mobility in Hungary and Poland. „The Polish Sociological Bulletin” 46: 127–140.
  • Ayalon, Hanna i Yossi Shavit. 2004. Educational Reforms and Inequalities in Israel: The MMI Hypothesis Revisited. „Sociology of Education” 77(2): 103–120.
  • Becker, Sascha i Frank Siebern-Thomas. 2001. Returns to Education in Germany: A variable treatment intensity approach,îEUI Working Paper ECO 2001/09.
  • Beller, Emily i Michael Hout. 2006. Welfare states and social mobility: How educational and social policy may affect cross-national differences in the association between occupational origins and destinations. „Research in social stratification and mobility” 24(4): 353–365.
  • Beskid, Lidia (red.). 1984. Warunki życia i potrzeby społeczeństwa polskiego. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
  • Black, Sandra E., Paul J. Devereux i Kjell G. Salvanes. 2005. Why the apple doesn’t fall far: Understanding intergenerational transmission of human capital. „American Economic Review” 95: 437–449.
  • Blanden, Jo, Paul Gregg i Lindsey Macmillan. 2013. Intergenerational persistence in income and social class: the effect of within-group inequality. „Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A Statistics in Society” 176(2): 541–563.
  • Blau, Peter M. i Otis D. Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Academic Press.
  • Blossfeld, Hans-Peter (red.). 2008. Young workers, globalization and the labor market: Comparing early working life in eleven countries. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Bouchet-Valat, Milan, Camille Peugny i Louis-André Vallet. 2016. Inequality of educational returns in France: changes in the effect of education and social background on occupational careers. W: Fabrizio Bernardi i Gabriele Ballarino (red.). Education, Occupation and Social Origin. A Comparative Analysis of the Transmission of Socio-Economic Inequalities. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward El-gar, s. 20–33.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Breen, Richard (red.). 2004. Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Breen, Richard. 2010. Educational expansion and social mobility in the twentieth century. „Social Forces” 89: 365–388.
  • Breen, Richard i John H. Goldthorpe. 2001. Class, mobility and merit: The experience of two British birth cohorts. „European Sociological Review” 17(2): 81–101.
  • Breen, Richard i Ruud Luijkx. 2004. Social Mobility in Europe Between 1970 and 2000. W: R. Breen (red.). Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, s. 37–77.
  • Breen, Richard i Jan O. Jonsson. 2005. Inequality of Opportunity in Comparative Perspective: Recent Research on Educational Attainment and Social Mobility. „Annual Review of Sociology” 31: 223–243.
  • Breen, Richard i Kristian Bernt Karlson. 2014. Education and Social Mobility: New Analytical Approaches. „European Sociological Review” 30(1): 107–118.
  • Bukodi, Erzsébet, Erikson, Robert i John H. Goldthorpe. 2014. The effects of social origins and cognitive ability on educational attainment: Evidence from Britain and Sweden. „Acta Sociologica” 57(4): 293–310.
  • Bukodi, Erzsébet, John H. Goldthorpe, Lorraine Waller i Jouni Kuha. 2015. The Mobility Problem in Britain: New Findings from the Analysis of Birth Cohort Data. „The British Journal of Sociology” 66(1): 93–117.
  • Burt, Ronald S. 1998. The gender of social capital. „Rationality and Society” 10(1): 5–46.
  • Büchel, Felix i Antje Mertens. 2004. Overeducation, undereducation, and the theory of career mobility. „Applied Economics” 36(8): 803–816.
  • Chevalier, Arnaud i Joanne Lindley. 2009. Overeducation and the skills of UK graduates. „Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A.” 172(2): 307–337.
  • Cichomski, Bogdan, Tomasz Jerzyński i Marcin Zieliński. 2003. Polskie Generalne Sondaże Społeczne: skumulowany komputerowy zbiór danych 1992–2002. Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Społecznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski.
  • Domański, Henryk. 2000. On the Verge of Convergence. Social Stratification in Eastern Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.
  • Domański, Henryk. 2017. Związek wyników egzaminu maturalnego z pochodzeniem społecznym i regułami merytokracji. „Edukacja” 3(142): 70–82.
  • Domański, Henryk. 2018. Wpływ wykształcenia na rozkład zarobków: 1988–2013. „Ekonomista” 1: 7–24.
  • Domański, Henryk i Dariusz Przybysz. 2007. Homogamia małżeńska a hierarchie społeczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
  • Domański, Henryk, Bogdan Mach i Dariusz Przybysz. 2008. Pochodzenie społeczne–wykształcenie–zawód: ruchliwość społeczna w Polsce w latach 1982–2006. W: H. Domański (red.). Zmiany stratyfikacji społecznej w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, s. 97–132.
  • Domański, Henryk, Bogdan W. Mach i Dariusz Przybysz. 2018. Social mobility in education and occupation, 1982–2006. W: I. Tomescu-Dubrow i in. (red.), Dynamics of Class and Stratification in Poland. Budapest – New York: CEU Press, s. 83–110.
  • Domański, Henryk, Michał Federowicz, Artur Pokropek, Dariusz Przybysz, Michał Sitek, Marek Smulczyk i Tomasz Żółtak. 2016. Ścieżki edukacyjne a umiejętności i pozycja społeczna. „Studia Socjologiczne” 220(1): 67–98.
  • Domański, Henryk, Zbigniew Sawiński i Kazimierz M. Słomczyński. 2007. Nowa klasyfikacja i skale zawodów. Socjologiczne wskaźniki pozycji społecznej w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
  • Erikson Robert i Jan Jonsson. 1998. Social origin as an interest-bearing asset: family background and labour-market rewards among employees in Sweden. „Acta Sociologica” 41: 19–36.
  • Erikson, Robert i John H. Goldthorpe. 1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Featherman, David L. i Robert M. Hauser. 1978. Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
  • Fernandez, Roberto M. i Nancy Weinberg. 1997. Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. „American Sociological Review” 62: 883–902.
  • Francis, Green F. i Yu Zhu. 2010. Overqualification, job dissatisfaction, and increasing dispersion in the returns to graduate education. „Oxford Economic Papers” 10: 1–24.
  • Gangl, Markus. 2002. Changing labour markets and early career outcomes: labour market entry in Europe over the past decade. „Work, employment and society” 16(1): 67–90.
  • Gerber, Theodore i Michael Hout. 2004. Tighteening up: declining class mobility during Russia’s market transition. „American Sociological Review” 69: 677–703.
  • Gerber, Theodore P. 2002. Structural change and post-socialist stratification: Labor market transitions in contemporary Russia. „American Sociological Review” 67: 629–659.
  • Gerber, Theodore P. i Olga Mayorova. 2003. Getting Personal: The Use of Networks For Successful Job Searches in Russia, 1985–2001. Research Commitee on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC28), Tokyo.
  • Glaesser, Judith i Barry Cooper. 2014. Using rational action theory and Bourdieu’s habitus theory together to account for educational decision-making in England and Germany. „Sociology” 48(3): 463–481.
  • Goldin, Claudia i Lawrence F. Katz. 2008. The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Goldthorpe, John H. 1996. Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: the case of persisting differentials in educational attainment. „British Journal of Sociology” 47: 481–505.
  • Goldthorpe, John H. 2013. Understanding – and misunderstanding – social mobility in Britain: The entry of the economists, the confusion of politicians and the limits of educational policy. „Journal of Social Policy” 42: 431–450.
  • Goldthorpe, John H. 2016. Social class mobility in modern Britain: changing structure. „Journal of the British Academy” 4: 89–111.
  • Goldthorpe, John H. i Colin Mills. 2004. Trends in intergenerational class mobility in Britain in the late twentieth century. W: Richard Breen (red.). Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, s. 195–224.
  • Goldthorpe, John H. i Colin Mills. 2008. Trends in Intergenerational Class Mobility in Modern Britain: Evidence From National Surveys, 1972–2005. „National Institute Economic Review” 205(1): 83–100.
  • Goldthorpe, John H. i Michelle Jackson. 2007. Intergenerational class mobility in contemporary Britain: Political concerns and empirical findings. „The British Journal of Sociology” 58(4): 525–546.
  • Goldthorpe, John H. i Michelle Jackson. 2008. Education-based meritocracy: The barriers to its realization. W: A. Lareau i D. Conley (red.). Social class: How does it work. New York: Russell Sage, s. 93–117.
  • Goodman, Leo A. 1972. Some multiplicative models of cross-classified data. „Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Prohability” 1: 649–696.
  • Granovetter, Mark. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge.
  • Grusky, David B., Bruce Western i Christopher Wimer (red.). 2011. The Great Recession. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Gil-Hernández, Carlos J., Ildefonso Marqués-Perales i Sandra Fachelli. 2017. Inter-generational social mobility in Spain between 1956 and 2011: The role of educational expansion and economic modernisation in a late industrialised country. „Research in Social Stratification and Mobility” 51: 14–27.
  • Hout, Michael. 1983. Mobility tables. Bevery Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Hout, Michael. 1988. More universalism, less structural mobility: the American occupational structure in the 1980s. „American Journal of Sociology” 93: 1358–1400.
  • Hout, Michael. i Daniel P. Dohan. 1996. Two paths to educational opportunity: Class and educational selection in Sweden and the United States. W: R. Erikson i J. O. Jonsson (red.). Can education be equalized. The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, s. 207–231.
  • Jackson, Michelle, John H. Goldthorpe i Collin Mills. 2005. Education, employers and class mobility. „Research in Social Stratification and Mobility” 23: 3–33.
  • Jonsson, Jan O. i Colin Mills. 1993. Social class and educational attainment in historical perspective: A Swedish-English comparison Part I. „British Journal of Sociology” 44(2): 213–247.
  • Li, Yaojun i Fiona Devine. 2011. Is social mobility really declining? Intergenerational class mobility in Britain in the 1990s and the 2000s. „Sociological Research Online” 16(3): 1–15.
  • Lin, Nan. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. „Annual Review of Sociology” 25(1): 467–487.
  • Lindbekk, Tore. 1998. The Education Backclash Hypothesis: The Norwegian Experience 1960–92. „Acta Sociologica” 41: 151–162.
  • Lipset, Seymour M. i Hans L. Zetterberg. 1956. A theory of social mobility. Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Lissowski, Grzegorz. 1984. Zastosowanie modeli logarytmiczno-liniowych do analizy związków między wieloma zmiennymi jakościowymi. „Studia Socjologiczne” 2(93): 239–263.
  • Lucas, Samuel R. 2001. Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects. „The American Journal of Sociology” 106(6): 1642–1690.
  • Mach, Bogdan W. 2004. Intergenerational mobility in Poland: 1972-88-94. W: Richard Breen (red.). Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, s. 269–286.
  • Mały Rocznik Statystyczny Polski 2015. 2015. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
  • Mare, Robert D. 2014. Multigenerational aspects of social stratification: Issues for further research. „Research in Social Stratification and Mobility” 35: 121–128.
  • Marks, Gary N. 2014. Education, Social Background and Cognitive Ability: The Decline of the Social. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Marsden, Peter V. i Jeanne S. Hurlbert. 1988. Social resources and mobility outcomes: A replication and extension. „Social Forces” 66(4): 1038–1059.
  • Marshall, Gordon, Adam Swift i Stephen Roberts. 1997. Against the odds?: Social class and social justice in industrial societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Maurice, Marc i François Sellier. 1979. Societal analysis of industrial relations: A comparison between France and West Germany. „British Journal of Industrial Relations” 17(3): 322–336.
  • McNamara Erin, Weininger Elliot B. i Annette Lareau. 2003. From social ties to social capital: class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. „American Educational Research Journal” 40(2): 319–351.
  • Mocanu, Cristina, Ana M. Zamfir, Eliza O. Lungu, i Eva Militaru. 2012. School-To-Work Transition Of Higher Education Graduates In Four Eastern European Countries. Maastricht School of Management. Working Paper, 2012/15.
  • Müller, Walter i Reinhard Pollak. 2004. Social mobility in West Germany: The long arms of history discovered. W: R. Breen (red.). Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, s. 77–113.
  • Nemeth, Renata. 2007. Changes in social mobility in Hungary during the transition period. „Review of Sociology” 13 (1): 49–66.
  • Paterson, Lindsay i Cristina Iannelli. 2007. Social class and educational attainment: A comparative study of England, Wales, and Scotland. „Sociology of Education” 80(4): 330–358.
  • Pfeffer F. T. i F. R. Hertel. 2015. How Has Educational Expansion Shaped Social Mobility Trends in the United States? „Social Forces” 94 (1): 143–180.
  • Pohoski, Michał i Bogdan W. Mach. 1986. Rozmiary i kierunki ruchliwości społecznej w latach 1972–1982. W: I. Białecki, H. Domański, B. Mach, M. Pohoski i W. Zaborowski (red.). Przemiany ruchliwości społecznej w Polsce. Warszawa: IFiS PAN, s. 15–49.
  • Pohoski, Michał i Marek Styczeń. 2000. Dynamika zatrudnienia i zarobków w okresie transformacji ustrojowej w Polsce. Warszawa: Instytut Socjologii UW, Zespół Badania Ruchliwości Społecznej.
  • Pohoski, Michał i Kazimierz M. Słomczyński. 1978. Społeczna klasyfikacja zawodów. Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
  • Przybysz, Dariusz. 2004. Modele logarytmiczno-liniowe dla zmiennych porządkowych. „ASK. Społeczeństwo. Badania. Metody” 13: 51–85.
  • Reay, Diane, Gill Crozier i John Clayton. 2009. Strangers in Paradise? Working-class Students in Elite Universities. „Sociology” 43(6): 1103–1121.
  • Riley, Matilda White, Robert L. Kahn i Anne Foner. 1994. Age and Structural Lag: Society’s Failure to Provide Meaningful Opportunities in Work, Family, and Leisure. New York: Wiley.
  • Rocznik Statystyczny Polski 2007. 2007. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
  • Rona-Tas, Akos i Alya Guseva. 2001. The Privileges of Past Communist Party Membership in Russia and Endogenous Switching Regressions. „Social Science Research” 30: 641–652.
  • Sawiński, Zbigniew. 2018. Social Change, Educational Expansion, and Inequality in Access to Education. W: I. Tomescu-Dubrow i in. (red.). Dynamics of Class and Stratification in Poland. Budapest – New York: CEU Press, s. 111–133.
  • Sawiński Zbigniew i Henryk Domański. 1989. Dimensions of Social Stratification. A Comparative Analysis. „International Sociology” Vol. 19, No. 1.
  • Shavit, Yossi i Vered Kraus. 1993. Educational transitions in Israel. A test of industrialization and credentialism hypothesis. W: Y. Shavitt i H.-P. Blossfeld (red.). Persistent Inequality. Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Shavit, Yossi i Karin Westerbeek. 1998. Reforms, expansion, and equality of opportunity. Shavit, Yossi i Walter Müller. 1998. From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Sieben, Inge, Johannes Hunink i Paul de Graaf. 2001. Family background and siblings resemblance in educational attainment: trends in former FRG, the former GDR, and the Netherlands. „European Sociological Review” 17(4): 401–430.
  • Słomczyński, Kazimierz M., Ireneusz Białecki, Henryk Domański, Krystyna Janicka, Bogdan W. Mach, Zbigniew Sawiński, Joanna Sikorska i Wojciech Zaborowski. 1989. Struktura społeczna: Schemat teoretyczny i warsztat badawczy. Warszawa: IFiS PAN.
  • Sorokin, Pitirim. 2009 [1927]. Ruchliwość społeczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
  • Sturgis, Patrick i Franz Buscha. 2015. Declining Social Mobility? Evidence from five linked Censuses in England and Wales 1971–2011. National Centre for Research Methods Working Paper 5.
  • Torche, Florencia. 2011. Is a college degree still the great equalizer? Intergenerational mobility across levels of schooling in the United States. „American Journal of Sociology” 117(3): 763–807.
  • Treiman, Donald J. 1970. Industrialization and Social Stratification. In Social Stratification: W: Edward O. Laumann (red.). Research and Theory for the 1970s. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, s. 207–234.
  • Vallet, Louis-Andre. 2004. Change in Intergenerational Class Mobility in France from the 1970s to the 1990s and its Explanation: An Analysis Following the Casmin Approach. W: R. Breen (red.). Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Whelan, Christopher T. i Richard Layte. 2002. Late industrialization and the increased merit selection hypothesis. Ireland as a test case. „European Sociological Review” 18(1): 35–50.
  • Xie, Y. 1992. The Log-Multiplicative Layer Effect Model for Comparing Mobility Tables. „American Sociological Review” 57: 380–395.
  • Yakubovich, Valery i Irina Kozina. 2000. The changing significance of ties: An exploration of the hiring channels in the Russian transitional labor market. „International Sociology” 15(3): 479–500.
  • Zagórski, Krzysztof. 1978. Rozwój, struktura i ruchliwość społeczna. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-4a43414e-0bc3-4519-b7ed-9f080d62e3d2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.