PL EN


2017 | Tom 2 | 29-43
Article title

Political and Strategic Dimensions of the Relations Between the EU and South Korea

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The political and strategic dimensions of the relations between the EU and the Republic of Korea fall within the category of a more complex interaction namely economic and cultural. In this perspective, economic relations seem to prevail. However, the political and strategic dimension is growing very quickly, paradoxically also due to the fast-advancing economic cooperation, especially since the 2010 Free Trade Agreement (FTA). From that point forward, both parties have considered each other strategic partners.In the current situation in the East Asia: the growing military power of China, the possible changes in political alliances and security issues on the Korean Peninsula and Japan’s departure from a pacifist stance, the political and strategic dimension of the relations between the EU and the Republic of Korea are likely to gain in significance. Although the interaction between Europe and Korea boasts a long history, strict EU-Korea relations have been varied. Bilateral relations between Korea and some EU member states are at a different level of advancement than overall EU-Korea interactions. Despite the cultural differences and often competing interests and threats, relations between the EU and Korea are still important for both sides.
Keywords
Year
Volume
Pages
29-43
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-12-01
Contributors
author
  • John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (Poland)
References
  • Department of Political Science, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland (lbuczek@kul.pl)
  • The exception was China, which had very strong influence to Korea.
  • French Campaign against Korea, 1866. (2013, November 16). New World Encyclopedia, . Retrieved 11:06, November 23, 2016 from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/p/index.php?title=French_Campaign_against_Korea,_1866&oldid=976158.
  • 오홍국, 大院君의 國防力 强化政策 硏究, 연세대학교 교육대학원2003, p. 6-8, 49.
  • See also. Treaty of Annexation (August 22, 1910), East Asian Studies Documents, USC-UCLA Joint East Asian Studies Center.
  • Cairo Declaration of December 1, 1943 (China, United Kingdom, United States) [in:] Leland M. Goodrich, Korea. A study of U. S. policy in the United Nations,. New York 1956, p. 214.
  • L. M. Goodrich, Korea. A Study of U. S. Policy in the United Nations. Council on Foreign Relations. 58 East 68th Street, New York 1956, p. 214.
  • L. Buczek, Polityczne, gospodarcze i kulturowe relacje Unii Europejskiej i Republiki Korei, „Studia Polityczne” 45(2017), no 1, p. 180.
  • http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1767763; Open Source Center Report, North Korea 2010 Overseas Diplomatic Directory for Europe and Central Asia, UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO, 29 XII 2010.
  • Sung-Won Yoon, Is FTA for ‘Up Closer and Personal’? Reflections on Media and Public Views on the EU in Korea, “Baltic Journal of European Studies” 3(2015), no 3, p. 38.
  • Asian Tigers is the term referring of group of fast developing high-growth economies: first Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, cf.: P. Morris, Asia's Four Little Tigers: a comparison of the role of education in their development, „Comparative Education” 32(1) 1996, p. 95.
  • D. Hundt, J. Kim, Competing Notions of Regionalism in South Korean Politics, “Japanese Journal of Political Science” 12 (2011), no 2, p. 255.
  • Third Apec Ministerial Meeting Seoul, Korea 12-14 November 1991 Joint Statement, http://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Annual-Ministerial-Meetings.aspx?year=1991 [access 18-10-2016].
  • D. Hundt, J. Kim, op. cit., p. 256.
  • W. Katia, J. Huang, East Asian Security Revisited in Light of the European Experience, “Issues & Studies” no 46(1) 2010, p. 112.
  • Ibidem, p. 112.
  • B. Bridges, Western Europe and North Korea: New opening and old problems, “East Asia”, 20 (2003), no 3, p. 87-88.
  • Sung-Hoon Park, Sung-Won Yoon, EU perceptions through the FTA lens: main results of interviews among the Korean “elites”, “Asia Europe Journal” 8 (2010), no 2, p. 178.
  • Ch.M. Dent, New Interdependencies in Korea-EU Trade Relations, “Journal of Contemporary Asia” 28 (1998) no 3, p. 372.
  • Doo Jin Kim, EU Trade Protectionism and Korean Overseas Investment: The Case of Asian Globalizing MNCs, “The Korean Journal of International Relations” 43 (2003) no 5, p. 130.
  • Sung-Hoon Park, op. cit., p. 178.
  • Sung-Hoon Park, Heungchong Kim, Asia Strategy of the European Union and Asia-EU Economic Relations:
  • Basic Concepts and New Developments, (scientific conference materials: ”The EU-Asia Relations: Building Multilat-eralism?, Hong-Kong 2005), p. 1.
  • EU External Action Service, http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/vietnam/eu_vietnam/tech_financial_cooperation/regional_cooperation/index_en.htm.
  • Towards a new Asia strategy. (1994) Communication from the Commission to the Council. COM (94) 314 final, 13 July 1994. [EU Commission - COM Document], p. 4.
  • Commission Of The European Communities, Toward a New Asia Strategy, com (94) 314, Brussels 1994, p. 3-6.
  • Sung-Hoon Park, op. cit., p. 177.
  • EU-South Korea Framework Agreement, Luxembourg, October 28, 1996 r. European External Action Service online.
  • http://www.mofa.go.kr/ENG/countries/regional/eu/index.jsp?menu=m_30_60_70.
  • http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/south-korea/.
  • Framework Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Republic of Korea, on the other part, May 10, 2010 („Official Journal” L 020, 23/01/2013 P. 0002 - 0024).
  • W. Moon, Whither East Asian economic integration? Korea’s regionalization cum globalization strategy, “Asia Europe Journal” 9 (2011), no. 1, p. 38-39.
  • Sung-Hoon Park, op. cit., p. 186.
  • Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Korea in European Union crisis management operations, “Official Journal of the Europe-an Union”, L 166, vol 57, 5 June 2014.
  • http://www.mofa.go.kr/ENG/countries/regional/eu/index.jsp?menu=m_30_60_70 and Sung-Hoon Park, op. cit., p. 177.
  • Sung-Hoon Park, op. cit., p. 178.
  • Later the European Union, since 1993.
  • Que Anh Dang, ASEM – the modern Silk Road: travelling ideas for education reforms and partnerships between Asia and Europe, “Comparative Education” 49(2013), p. 107.
  • 1-Bangkok, 2-London, 3-Seoul, 4-Copenhagen, 5-Hanoi, 6-Helsinki, 7-Beijing, 8-Brussels, 9-Vientiane, 10-Milan and 11-Ulaanbaatar, see more at: http://www.aseminfoboard.org/.
  • Ch. M. Dent, op. cit., p. 371.
  • Ho Thi Thu Hoai, Heda Hansenova, Globalisation of Trade and Transportation Between the ASEAN+3 Countries and the European Union, “Romanian Journal of European Affairs”(2006)6, no 2, p. 54.
  • The organisation was founded in 1999. The members are informally most developed countries of the world. A member of the G 20 is also the EU, although the 3 richest member states sending there their own separate delegations.
  • SERI Quarterly, EU Ambassador Tomasz Kozlowski on the Korea-EU FTA and the Economic Outlook, Seoul 2012, p. 73
  • W. Moon, Whither East Asian economic integration? Korea’s regionalization cum globalization strategy, “Asia Europe Journal” 9 (2011), no. 1, p. 39.
  • A. Marx, J. Wouters, W. Moon, Y. Rhee, S. Park, EU–Korea relations in a changing world project: main results and recommendations, “Asia Europe Journal” 12 (2014), no 3, p. 240.
  • M. Nowacki, Prawne aspekty bezpieczeństwa energetycznego w UE, Warszawa 2010, p. 178.
  • J. Kim, The Formulation of Korea's Resource Policy: Resource Diplomacy, Public-Private Consortium and International Agreements, “Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy” 9 (2014), no 1, p. 290.
  • Ibidem, p. 290 and p. 312.
  • KEDO - Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization. In the framework of the KEDO, North Korea - in exchange for giving up the development of its nuclear programme - would receive two modern LWR (light water reactors).
  • M. Lee, The EU’s Korea relationship: enlargement effects, “Asia Europe Journal” 5 (2007), no 3, p. 376.
  • H. Kim, Inter-Korean relations and the roles of the US and of the EU, “Asia Europe Journal” 1 (2003), no 4, p. 508.
  • The European External Action Service, EU-Asia Security Factsheet, p. 1.
  • Jae-Seung Lee, The Two Faces of EU-North Korea Relations, “The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis”, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2005, p. 47.
  • M. Lee, op. cit., p. 372.
  • B. Bridges, Western Europe and North Korea: New openings and old problems, „East Asia” 2003, vol. 20, Issue 3, p. 91.
  • See also Moosung Lee, The EU, regional cooperation, and the North Korean nuclear crisis, “Asia Europe Journal”, 2016, vol. 14, Issue 4, p. 411.
  • https://piie.com/blogs/north-korea-witness-transformation/moon-jae-ins-berlin-speech. Although this policy in current political context is fading to black and term “Berlin Speech” is no longer used.
  • Por. A. Berkofsky, EU-North Korea Relations - Engagement Course on Hold, „International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs” , issue: 02(2008), p. 63.
  • M. Lee, op. cit., p. 374.
  • A. Marx, J. Wouters, W. Moon, Y. Rhee, S. Park, op. cit., p. 242.
  • D. Wituszyński, Seul: Korea Południowa i Unia Europejska uzyskują konsensus w sprawie Korei Północnej, http://www.polska-azja.pl/2016/02/15/seul-korea-poludniowa-i-unia-europejska-uzyskuja-konsensus-w-sprawie-korei-polnocnej/ [access 23-02-2016].
  • Jae Jung Suh, Allied to Race? The U.S.-Korea Alliance and Arms Race, “Asian Perspective” Vol. 33, No. 4, (2009),p. 101-104.
  • R.E. Kelly, Korea–European Union relations: beyond the FTA?, “International Relations of the Asia-Pacific” (2012) no. 12, p. 114.
  • Sung-Hoon Park, op. cit., p. 184.
  • Sung-Won Yoon, op. cit., p. 44.
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea, http://www.mofa.go.kr/ENG/countries/regional/eu/index.jsp?menu=m_30_60_70 [28-02-2016].
  • A. Marx, J. Wouters, W. Moon, Y. Rhee, S. Park, op. cit., p. 233; 240.
  • First Republic of Korea EU Summit, Copenhagen, September 24. 2002, Joint Communique, 12334/02 (Presse 286), p. 1.
  • Prime Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Netherlands, Bernard Bot.
  • Republic of Korea EU Summit, Hanoi, October 9. 2004, Joint Press Statement, (Presse 11.10.04), p. 3.
  • EU-Republic of Korea Summit, Helsinki, September 9. 2006, Joint Press Statement, p. 1.
  • Republic of Korea-EU Summit, Seoul, May 23. 2009, Joint Press Statement, p. 1.
  • A Wróbel, Polityka handlowa Unii Europejskiej wobec państw Azji Wschodniej i Południowo Wschodniej, „International Relations”, issue 2 (46)2012, p. 217.
  • EU-Republic of Korea Summit, Brussels October 6. 2010 Joint Press Statement, Council of the European Union, 14547/10 presse [266], p. 1.
  • Republic of Korea-EU Summit, Joint Press Statement, Council Of The European Union Seoul, March 28. 2012, 8255/12 presse 140, p. 1-2.
  • Council of the European Union, European Union -Republic of Korea summit, Joint Press Statement, Brussels, 8 November 2013, 15876/13 (OR. en) presse 463, p. 1-6.
  • European Council, The President, Joint Press Statement, 8th Republic of Korea-EU Summit, Press release, Seoul September 15. 2015, p. 1.
  • A. Marx, J. Wouters, W. Moon, Y. Rhee, S. Park, op. cit., p. 232.
  • E. Zelenovskaya, Green Growth Policy in Korea: A case study, International Center for Climate Governance, 2012, p. 5.
  • A. Marx, J. Wouters, W. Moon, Y. Rhee, S. Park, op. cit., p. 239.
  • See also Willem van der Geest,, Shaping factors of EU–East Asia relations, “Asia Europe Journal”, 4 (2006), p. 143.
  • R.J. Kelly, op. cit., p. 114.
  • Ibidem, p. 120-121.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-4bc10c16-523c-4bc0-8356-5f0be6c19a34
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.