PL EN


2017 | 48 | 63-84
Article title

Libertarianizm i teoria tożsamości Koncepcja najbliższego kontynuatora Roberta Nozicka jako teoria tła zasady autowłasności

Selected contents from this journal
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The research problem of the present paper is the following question: May the closest continuer theory serve as a background theory for the principle of self‑ownership? This issue is a peculiar instance of the more general problem of the anthropological presuppositions of the libertarian political philosophy that can be phrased in a Kantian manner: How is self‑ownership possible?; or in a more detailed way: What sort of entity a human being has to be, if it is possible for him to be a self‑owner? The research thesis that is argued for in the paper says that: 1) the closest continuer theory may not serve as a background theory for a wide principle of self‑ownership since as an example of reductionist theory of personal identity it excludes the possibility of possessing this set of psychological facts which the personal identity is reducible to and possession of which is presupposed by the wide principle of self‑ownership; 2) the closest continuer theory may though serve as a background theory for a narrow principle of self‑ownership since this principle assumes that one can own only scarce resources and psychological facts are not instances thereof.
Contributors
References
  • Arneson R.J., Lockean Self‑Ownership: Towards a Demolition, „Political Studies” 1991, Vol. 39, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9248.1991.tb00580.x.
  • Arneson R.J., Property Rights in Persons, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1992, Vol. 9, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003654.
  • Arneson R.J., Self Ownership and World Ownership: Against Left‑Libertarianism, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 2010, Vol. 27, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990070.
  • Arras J.D., The Way We Reason Now: Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, red. B. Steinbock, New York 2007.
  • Arystoteles, Metafizyka, przeł. K. Leśniak, Warszawa 2009.
  • Barry B., Self Ownership and the Libertarian Challenge, „Times Literary Supplement” 1996, 15 XI.
  • Block W., Toward a Libertarian Theory of Inalienability: A Critique of Rothbard, Barnett, Smith, Kinsella, Gordon, and Epstein, „The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2003, Vol. 17, nr 2.
  • Cohen G.A., Self‑Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge 1995, Studies in Marxism and Social Theory.
  • Dan‑Cohen M., Responsibility and the Boundaries of the Self, „Harvard Law Review” 1992, Vol. 105, nr 5.
  • Dan‑Cohen M., The Value of Ownership, „The Journal of Political Philosophy” 2001, Vol. 9, nr 4.
  • Daniels N., Reflective Equilibrium, [w:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, wiosna 2011, [online] https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/reflective‑equilibrium/.
  • Daniels N., Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1979, Vol. 76, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025881.
  • Dominiak Ł., Metoda równowagi refleksyjnej (reflective equilibrium) w filozofii polityki, „Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 2012, Vol. 36.
  • Dominiak Ł., Problem aksjomatyczności zasady autowłasności w filozofii politycznej libertarianizmu, „Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 2016, Vol. 49.
  • Dworkin R., Taking Rights Seriously, London 2013, Bloomsbury Revelations.
  • Feser E., Personal Identity and Self‑Ownership, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 2005, Vol. 22, nr 2.
  • Feser E., Self‑Ownership, Abortion, and the Rights of Children: Toward a More Conservative Libertarianism, „The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2004, Vol. 18, nr 3.
  • Filozofia podmiotu, wybór J. Górnicka‑Kalinowska, przeł. B. Chwedeńczuk i in., Warszawa 2001, Fragmenty Filozofii Analitycznej, 8.
  • Gorr M., Justice, Self‑Ownership, and Natural Assets, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1995, Vol. 12, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004751.
  • Haslett D.W., What Is Wrong with Reflective Equilibria?, „The Philosophical Quarterly” 1987, Vol. 37, nr 148, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2220400.
  • Honoré A.M., Ownership, [w:] Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (First Series), red. A.G. Guest, Oxford 1961.
  • Hoppe H.‑H., Democracy – The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order, New Brunswick 2007.
  • Hoppe H.‑H., Economic Science and the Austrian Method, Auburn 2012.
  • Hoppe H.‑H., The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, Auburn 2006.
  • Hoppe H.‑H., The Great Fiction. Property, Economics, Society, and the Politics of Decline, Baltimore 2012.
  • Hoppe H.‑H., The Praxeological Foundations of Epistemology and Ethics, Q&A, „Austrian Economics Newsletter” 1988, Vol. 9, nr 2.
  • Hoppe H.‑H., A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Economics, Politics, and Ethics, Auburn 2012, Ludwig von Mises Institute’s Studies in Austrian Economics.
  • Juruś D., W poszukiwaniu podstaw libertarianizmu w perspektywie Rothbardowskiej koncepcji własności, Kraków 2012.
  • Kant I., Prolegomena do wszelkiej przyszłej metafizyki, która będzie mogła wystąpić jako nauka, przeł. B. Bornstein, Warszawa 1960, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
  • Kinsella S., Against Intellectual Property, Auburn 2008.
  • Kinsella S., How We Come to Own Ourselves, „Mises Daily” 2006, 7 IX, [online] http://mises.org/library/how‑we‑come‑own‑ourselves.
  • Left‑Libertarianism and Its Critics. The Contemporary Debate, red. P. Vallentyne, H. Steiner, New York 2000.
  • Lippert‑Rasmussen K., Against Self‑Ownership: There Are No Fact‑Insensitive Ownership Rights over One’s Body, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 2008, Vol. 36, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088‑4963.2008.00125.x.
  • Locke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, przeł. Z. Rau, Warszawa 1992, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
  • Locke J., Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, t. 2, przeł. B.J. Gawecki, Warszawa 1955, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
  • Mack E., The Self‑Ownership Proviso: A New and Improved Lockean Proviso, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1995, vol. 12, nr 1.
  • McMahan J., The Ethics of Killing. Problems at the Margins of Life, New York 2002, Oxford Ethics Series.
  • Nozick R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford 1999.
  • Nozick R., Philosophical Explanations, Cambridge 1981.
  • The Origins of Left‑Libertarianism. An Anthology of Historical Writings, red. P. Vallentyne, H. Steiner, New York 2000.
  • Otsuka M., Libertarianism without Inequality, Oxford 2003.
  • Palmer T.G., G.A. Cohen on Self‑Ownership, Property, and Equality, „Critical Review. A Journal of Politics and Society” 1998, Vol. 12, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08913819808443498.
  • Parfit D., Reasons and Persons, Oxford 1987.
  • Pateman C., Self‑Ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts, „The Journal of Political Philosophy” 2002, Vol. 10, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467‑9760.00141.
  • Pendlebury M., Hudson P., Moellendorf D., Capitalist Exploitation, Self‑Ownership, and Equality, „The Philosophical Forum” 2001, Vol. 32, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.
  • 1111/0031‑806X.00062.
  • Rawls J., Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics, „The Philosophical Review” 1951, Vol. 60, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2181696.
  • Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge 1971.
  • Rothbard M., The Ethics of Liberty, New York 1998.
  • Rothbard M., For a New Liberty. The Libertarian Manifesto, Auburn 2002.
  • Ryan A., Self‑Ownership, Autonomy, and Property Rights, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1994, Vol. 11, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004507.
  • Sandel M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, New York 1998.
  • Savigny F.C. von, Das Recht des Besitzes. Eine civilistische Abhandlung, Wien 1865.
  • Shoemaker S., Swinburne R., Personal Identity, Oxford 1984, Great Debates in Philosophy.
  • Steiner H., An Essay on Rights, Oxford 1994.
  • Stump E., Non‑Cartesian Substance Dualism and Materialism without Reductionism, „Faith and Philosophy” 1995, Vol. 12, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199512430.
  • Taylor R.S., Self‑Ownership and the Limits of Libertarianism, „Social Theory and Practice” 2005, Vol. 31, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200531423.
  • Watner C., The „Criminal” Metaphor in the Libertarian Tradition, „The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 1981, Vol. 5, nr 3.
  • Weinberg J., Freedom, Self‑Ownership, and Libertarian Philosophical Diaspora, „Critical Review. A Journal of Politics and Society” 1997, Vol. 11, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08913819708443464.
  • Wile A., Stephan Kinsella on Libertarian Legal Theory, Self‑Ownership, and Drug Laws. Exclusive Interview, „The Daily Bell” 2014, 20 VII, [online] http://www.thedailybell.com/exclusive‑interviews/35492/Anthony‑Wile‑Stephan‑Kinsella‑on‑Libertarian‑Legal‑Theory‑Self‑Ownership‑and‑Drug‑Laws/.
  • Williams B., Problems of the Self. Philosophical Papers, 1956‑1972,Cambridge 1973.
  • Wójcik B., Bioetyka i tożsamość człowieka, Tarnów 2007.
  • Wójcik B., Śmierć mózgu jako kryterium śmierci człowieka – problematyka filozoficzno‑etyczna, „Medycyna Praktyczna” 2007, nr 4.
  • Wójcik B., Świadomość ponowoczesna i jej krytyka. Funkcjonalizm homunkularny w interpretacji świadomości Daniela C. Dennetta, Kraków 1997, Rozprawy OBI.
  • Wójcik B., Zasady zachowania tożsamości genetycznej i psychicznej jako wyróżnik bioetyki personalistycznej, „Sympozjum” 2002, Vol. 6, nr 1.
  • Ziemiński I., Metafizyka śmierci, Kraków 2010, Myśl Filozoficzna – WAM.
  • Ziemiński I., Moralność i religia. Poglądy filozoficzne Josepha Butlera, Warszawa 2015.
  • Ziemiński I., Życie wieczne. Przyczynek do eschatologii filozoficznej, Poznań–Kraków 2013, Wykłady Otwarte z Teologii Naturalnej im. J.M. Bochańskiego OP, 4.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-4cd2e918-0977-4a52-adbd-2598ca0d65f3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.