PL EN


2012 | 5(7) | 263-273
Article title

Is the parallel competence set out in Regulation 1/2003 totally clear? Case comment to the preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice of 3 May 2011 Tele 2 v President of Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (Case C-375/09)

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
Keywords
Year
Volume
Pages
263-273
Physical description
Dates
published
2012-11-30
Contributors
References
  • Banasiński C., Bychowska M., ‘Kompetencje decyzyjne Komisji Europejskiej i Prezesa UOKiK wynikające z rozporządzenia Rady UE 1/2003 w świetle zasady równoległego stosowania wspólnotowego i krajowego prawa antymonopolowego’ [‘Decisional powers of the European Commission and UOKiK President resulting from the Regulation 1/2003 from the perspective of a principle of parallel application of Community and national antitrust law’] (2003) 3 Przegląd Prawa Handlowego
  • Cieśliński A. (ed.), Wspólnotowe prawo gospodarcze [EC economic law], vol. II, Warszawa 2007
  • Cseres K.J., ‘The Impact of Regulation 1/2003 in the New Member States’ (2010) 6(2) Competition Law Review
  • Gerber D. J., Cassinis P., ‘The ‘Modernisation’ of European Community Competition Law: Achieving Consistency in Enforcement – Part I’ (2006) 27(10) E.C.L.R.
  • Louis F., Accardo G., ‘Ne Bis in Idem, Part ‘Bis’ (2011) 34(2) World Competition
  • Wils W.P.J., ‘EU Antitrust Enforcement Powers and Procedural Rights and Guarantees: The Interplay between EU Law, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the European Convention of Human Rights’ (2011) 34(2) World Competition
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-4d274ce9-9701-43cc-817d-fd7c838e20c3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.