Is the parallel competence set out in Regulation 1/2003 totally clear? Case comment to the preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice of 3 May 2011 Tele 2 v President of Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (Case C-375/09)

• Authors: Ilona Szwedziak
• Languages of publication: EN
• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 5(7)
• Pages: 263-273

Dates

published

2012-11-30

Contributors

author

Ilona Szwedziak

References

• Banasiński C., Bychowska M., ‘Kompetencje decyzyjne Komisji Europejskiej i Prezesa UOKiK wynikające z rozporządzenia Rady UE 1/2003 w świetle zasady równoległego stosowania wspólnotowego i krajowego prawa antymonopolowego’ [‘Decisional powers of the European Commission and UOKiK President resulting from the Regulation 1/2003 from the perspective of a principle of parallel application of Community and national antitrust law’] (2003) 3 Przegląd Prawa Handlowego
• Cieśliński A. (ed.), Wspólnotowe prawo gospodarcze [EC economic law], vol. II, Warszawa 2007
• Cseres K.J., ‘The Impact of Regulation 1/2003 in the New Member States’ (2010) 6(2) Competition Law Review
• Gerber D. J., Cassinis P., ‘The ‘Modernisation’ of European Community Competition Law: Achieving Consistency in Enforcement – Part I’ (2006) 27(10) E.C.L.R.
• Louis F., Accardo G., ‘Ne Bis in Idem, Part ‘Bis’ (2011) 34(2) World Competition
• Wils W.P.J., ‘EU Antitrust Enforcement Powers and Procedural Rights and Guarantees: The Interplay between EU Law, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the European Convention of Human Rights’ (2011) 34(2) World Competition