HASBARA: PUBLIC DIPLOMACY WITH ISRAELI CHARACTERISTICS

• Authors: Jędrzejewska Karolina Zuzanna
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper presents the phenomena of hasbara, an Israeli method of conducting state’s public diplomacy. For Israel public diplomacy is a part of national effort, perceived as a tool to increase Israel’s status on the international arena and recognition from the international community. Therefore, it is a topic of utmost importance among Israeli society and scholars. The aim is to uncover trends in thoughts and opinions on the studied subject. Qualitative research methods were adopted, including historical, institutional and comparative approaches as suitable methods to describe complexity of such phenomena as hasbara. Research techniques included content analysis and case studies to uncover trends in thoughts and opinions on the presented subject. In this paper an answer to the research question on the conduct of Israeli public diplomacy is provided through deep analysis and synthesis of the author’s findings, with the said findings being presented by confronting them with main assumptions of the prior research on Israeli public diplomacy and posing questions for further research. Israeli public diplomacy is based on the idea of demonstrating that there is much more about Israel than conflict, tension and fighting terror to fight with the preexisting national stereotypes. A major paradigm shift has to be noticed here as it is no longer a discourse on the right of Israel to exist on the international arena (apart from Arab states and Palestinians), but it became a question of what Israel did and continues to do as an existing state to maintain its existence.

Keywords

EN

Israel, public diplomacy, image, hasbara, nation branding, soft power

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo UMK
• Journal: Torun International Studies
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 13
• Pages: 105-118

Contributors

author

Jędrzejewska Karolina Zuzanna

References

• Allan, D., & Brown, C. (2010). The Mavi Marmara at the Frontlines of Web 2.0. Journal of Palestine Studies, 40(1), 63-77.
• Avraham, E. (2009). Marketing and Managing Nation Branding During Prolonged Crisis: The Case of Israel. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 5(3), 202-212.
• Berti, B. (2015). Israel: Seeking Stability. Geopolitics and Democracy in the Middle East, 49.
• Caldwell, I. V., William, B., & Dennis, M. M. (2009). Anton Menning. Learning to Leverage New Media: The Israeli Defense Forces in Recent Conflicts. Military Review.
• Cowan, G., & Arsenault, A. (2008). Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 10-30.
• Cull, N. J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.
• Cull, N. J. (2010). Public Diplomacy: Seven Lessons for its Future from its Past. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(1), 11-17.
• Cummings, J. (2016). Israel’s Public Diplomacy: The Problems of Hasbara, 1966–1975. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
• Friedman, U. (2012, November 14). Israel Defense Forces Live Blogs Gaza Offensive, Foreign Policy. Retrived March 24, 2020, from https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/11/14/israel-defense-forces-live-blogs-gaza-offensive/
• Gilboa, E. (2006). Public Diplomacy: The Missing Component in Israel's Foreign Policy. Israel Affairs, 12(4), 715-747.
• Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77.
• Gilboa, E., & Shai, N. (2011). Rebuilding Public Diplomacy: The Case of Israel. In E. Gilboa & N. Shai (Eds.), Trials of Engagement (pp. 33-54). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004179400.i-309.12
• Greenfield, S. (2012). Israeli Hasbara: Myths and Facts. Molad, the center for the renewal of Israeli Democracy. Retrived March 24, 2020, from http://www.molad.org/en/researches/israeli-hasbara-myths-and-facts
• Gregory, B. (2008). Public Diplomacy: Sunrise of an Academic Field. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 274-290.
• Hadari, G., & Turgeman, A. (2016). Chaos is the Message: The Crisis of Israeli Public Diplomacy. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 10(3), 393-404.
• Harkham, R.D. (2011). Understanding Israel's Public Diplomacy Strengths and Weaknesses. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 5(3), 103-113.
• Herstein, R., & Berger, R. (2013). A country as a Brand: Israel's Evolving Branding Strategy. Journal of Brand Strategy, 2(2), 177-188.
• Leonard, M., & Smewing, C. (2003). Public Diplomacy and the Middle East. Foreign Policy Centre.
• Lungen, P. (2014, March 17). Israel Re-brands with New Holistic Approach, The Canadian Jewish News. Retrived March 24, 2020, from https://www.cjnews.com/news/business/israel-re-brands-new-holistic-approach
• Medzini, M. (2012). Reflections on Israel's Public Diplomacy. Bulletin du Centre de recherche français à Jérusalem. Retrived March 24, 2020, from https://journals.openedition.org/bcrfj/6829
• Meir, G. (2005, May 24), What “Hasbara” is Really All About? Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrived March 24, 2020 from https://mfa.gov.il/mfa/abouttheministry/pages/what%20hasbara%20is%20really%20all%20about%20-%20may%202005.aspx
• Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Melissen, J. (2011). Beyond the New Public Diplomacy. Clingendael Paper no. 3. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for International Studies ‘Clingendael. Retrieved from: https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20111014_cdsp_paper_jmelissen.pdf
• Melissen, J. (2013). Public Diplomacy. In A.F.Cooper, J.Heine and R.Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Retrived from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588862.013.0025
• Nye Jr, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
• Nye Jr, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94-109.
• Nye, J. S. (2008). Toward a Liberal Realist Foreign Policy: The Next President Can Advance American Interests by Putting Global Challenges in Strategic Context and Refocusing the United States as a Smart Power. Harvard Magazine, 110(4), 36.
• Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. Public Affairs.
• Schleifer, R. (2003). Jewish and Contemporary Origins of Israeli Hasbara. Jewish Political Studies Review, 15(1/2),123-153.
• Shenhav, S. R., Sheafer, T., & Gabay, I. (2010). Incoherent Narrator: Israeli Public Diplomacy During the Disengagement and the Elections in the Palestinian Authority. Israel Studies, 15(3), 143-162.
• Shore, N. (2010). Brand Israel: An Analysis of Nation Branding Concepts as they Relate to the State of Israel. University of Southern California.
• Snow, N. (2009). Rethinking Public Diplomacy In N. Snow, & P.M. Taylor (Eds.) , Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Routledge.
• Snow, N., & Cull, N. J. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Routledge.
• Swalha, A. (2014). The Anti-Israel Toolbox: From Hard Power to Soft Tools. Strategic Assessment, 17(1), 21-31.
• Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. Netherlands Institute of International Relations" Clingendael".
• Toledano, M., & McKie, D. (2013). Public Relations and Nation Building: Influencing Israel. Routledge.