Praktyka laboratoryjna i warunki jej stabilności. Wokół stanowisk Pawła Zeidlera oraz Iana Hackinga

• Authors: Ewa Bińczyk

Title variants

EN

Laboratory Practice and Conditions of Its Stability. Remarks on Paweł Zeidler’s and Ian Hacking’s Views

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

The article presents the specificity of standpoints in which laboratory, instrumental and practical aspect of science is strongly underlined. This is mainly Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (Science and Technology Studies, STS), but also the interesting conception of a Polish philosopher, Paweł Zeidler, who analyses laboratory practice of chemistry. The text indicates the originality of Zeidler’s view, its merits and weak points. The author polemicizes with Zeidler and proposes an alternative interpretation of Ian Hacking’s perspective, who describes the roots of stability of laboratory practice.

Keywords

PL

Socjologia wiedzy naukowej; studia nad nauką oraz technologią; nowy eksperymentalizm; praktyka laboratoryjna; stabilność nauki; rola metafor w nauce; krytyka reprezentacjonizmu; teza Duhema; solidne dopasowanie; interaktywna stabilizacja; metrologia

EN

Sociology of Scientific Knowledge; Science and Technology Studies; New Experimentalism; laboratory practice; stability of science; the role of metaphors in science; the criticism of representationalism; Duhem thesis; robust fit; interactive stabilization; metrology

• Publisher: Science Studies Committee, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 48
• Issue: 3 (193)
• Pages: 163-183

Contributors

author

Ewa Bińczyk

• Instytut Filozofii UMK