Rodzina w dyskursie polskiego Kościoła katolickiego. Badania korpusowe z perspektywy Krytycznej Analizy Dyskursu

• Authors: Victoria Kamasa

Title variants

EN

Family in the Discourse of the Polish Catholic Church. Critical Discourse Analysis with Tools of Corpus Linguistics

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The paper aims at describing the discourse of the Polish Catholic Church upon family. The perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis is adapted and chosen categories suggested by van Leeuwen (2008) are used. The study is conducted on corpus (241-thousand words) of official documents published on website of Polish Bishop’s Conference. Qualitative and quantitative methods are used. The analysis reveals three discursive ways of constructing of the family: family as a part of church’s community, family as week, endangered and needing protection and strong connection between family and national identity.

Keywords

PL

krytyczna analiza dyskursu; językoznawstwo korpusowe; rodzina; teolingwistyka

EN

Critical Discourse Analysis; corpus linguistics; family; theolinguistics

• Publisher: Instytut Języka Polskiego Polskiej Akademii Nauk
• Journal: Socjolingwistyka
• Year: 2013
• Issue: 27
• Pages: 139-152

Dates

published

2013-12-31

Contributors

author

Victoria Kamasa

• Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza, Poznań

References

• Albakry M., 2004, U.S. “Friendly Fire” Bombing of Canadian Troops: Analysis of the Investigative Reports, „Critical Inquiry in Language Studies” 1, 163–178.
• Alcaraz - Ariza M., 2002, Evaluation in English-Medium Medical Book Reviews, „International Journal of English Studies”, 137–153.
• Anthony L. 2013, AntConc (online: http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/antconc_index.html, dostęp: 25 marca 2013).
• Bachmann I., 2011, Civil partnership — “gay marriage in all but name”: a corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK Parliament, „Corpora”, 77–105.
• Baker P., 2006, Using corpora in discourse analysis, Continuum, London.
• Bednarek M., 2008, Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined, „Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory” 4, 119–139.
• Bennett J., 2013, Moralising class: A discourse analysis of the mainstream political response to Occupy and the August 2011 British riots, „Discourse & Society” 24, 27–45.
• Bernstein B., 1990, Class, codes and control, Routledge, London, New York.
• Goffman E., 1981, Człowiek w teatrze życia codziennego, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczny, Warszawa.
• Komisja Episkopatu Polski, 2013, Zadania Konferencji Episkopatu Polski (online: http://episkopat.pl/episkopat/zadania/4464.1,index.html, dostęp: 25 marca 2013).
• Lukac M., 2011, Down to the bone: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of pro-eating disorder blogs, „Jezikoslovlje”, 187–209.
• Mokrzyszewski A., 2013, Samoidentyfikacje i duma narodowa Polaków (online:http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2004/K_162_04.PDF, dostęp: 10 kwietnia 2013).
• Subtirelu N.C., 2013, ‘English... it’s part of our blood’: Ideologies of language and nation in United States Congressional discourse, „Journal of Sociolinguistics”, 37–65.
• Reyes A., 2011, Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions, „Discourse & Society” 22, 781–807.
• Trent J., 2012, The internationalization of tertiary education in Asia: Language, identity and conflict, „Journal of Research in International Education” 11, 50–69.
• van Leeuwen T., 2008, Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
• Winkler I., 2011, The Representation of Social Actors in Corporate Codes of Ethics. How Code Language Positions Internal Actors, „Journal of Business Ethics” 101, 653–665.
• Wodak R., 2001, The discourse-historical approach, [w:] Methods of critical discourse analysis, red. W. Ruth, M. Michael, SAGE, London, 63–94.

Identifiers

ISSN

0208-6808