Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 4(34) | 15-31

Article title

Współczesne konteksty znaczeniowe terminu „niepełnosprawność” – implikacje Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawności i Zdrowia (ICF)

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

EN
Contemporary contexts of the meaning of the term “disability” – Implications of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

Languages of publication

PL EN

Abstracts

PL
Artykuł zawiera teoretyczną analizę współczesnych kontekstów znaczeniowych terminu „niepełnosprawność”. Wychodząc od pierwotnego modelu medycznego, poprzez model społeczny i biopsychospołeczny, ukazany został proces kształtowania się tego pojęcia. Odwołano się do Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Uszkodzeń, Niepełnosprawności i Upośledzeń oraz jej zmodyfikowanej wersji – Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawnościi Zdrowia. Przybliżone zostało pojęcie niepełnosprawności zawarte w ICF, a następnie w głównej mierze skoncentrowano się na jego różnorodnych kontekstach znaczeniowych. Dokonana w ich obrębie analiza ukazuje złożony charakter samego zjawiska niepełnosprawności, zróżnicowane wymiary jego doświadczania, rolę czynników osobistych i kontekstualnych, a także skomplikowaną naturę powiązań między poszczególnymi komponentami ICF: funkcjonowaniem, niepełnosprawnością i zdrowiem.
EN
The article provides a theoretical analysis of the contemporary contexts of the meaning of the term “disability.” Starting with the original medical model, through the social and biopsychosocial model, it shows the concept development process. Reference is made to the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps and its modified version – the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The article explains the concept of disability included in ICF and focuses mainly on the various contexts of its meaning. The analysis presented in the paper shows the complexity of the phenomenon of disability itself, different dimensions of disability experience, the role of personal and contextual factors, as well as the complex nature of relationships between the individual components of ICF: functioning, disability and health.

Contributors

  • Instytut Pedagogiki UMCS w Lublinie, ul. Narutowicza 12, 20-004 Lublin; tel. +48 81 5376301;
  • Instytut Pedagogiki UMCS w Lublinie, ul. Narutowicza 12, 20-004 Lublin; tel. +48 81 5376333
author
  • Instytut Pedagogiki UMCS w Lublinie, ul. Narutowicza 12, 20-004 Lublin; tel. +48 81 5376333

References

  • Albrecht, G.L., Seelman, K.D., Bury, M. (2001). Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Altman, M.B. (2014). Definitions, concepts, and measures of disability. Annals of Epidemiology, 24(1), 2–7.
  • Badley, E.M. (2008). Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 2335–2345.
  • Bickenbach, J. (2013). Disability, “being unhealthy”, and right to health. Human Rights and Disability, 4, 821–828.
  • Bruyére, S.M., Peterson, D.B. (2005). Introduction to special section on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): Implications for rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 103–104.
  • Chiu, H.-Ch., Ada, L., Butler, J., Coulson, S. (2010). Relative contribution of motor impairments to limitations in activity and restrictions in participation in adults with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24, 454–462.
  • Crow, L. (1996). Including all for our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. W: C. Barnes, G. Mercer (red.), Exploring the Divide (s. 55–72). Leeds: The Disability Press.
  • Dahl, T.H. (2002). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 201–204.
  • Davis, A.M., Perruccio, A.V., Ibrahim, S., Hogg-Johnson, S., Wong, R., Badley, E.M. (2012). Understanding recovery: Changes in the relationships of the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) components over time. Social Science and Medicine, 75, 1999–2006.
  • Dixon, D., Johnston, M., Elliott, A., Hannaford, P. (2012). Testing integrated behavioural and biomedical models of activity and activity limitations in a population-based sample. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 1157–1166.
  • Emerson, E., Madden, R., Graham, H., Llewellyn, G., Hatton, C., Robertson, J. (2011). The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health. Public Health, 125, 145–147.
  • Falvo, D.R. (2014). Medical and Psychosocial Aspects of Chronic Illness and Disability. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
  • Huber, J.G., Sillick, J., Skarakis-Doyle, E. (2010). Personal perception and personal factors: Incorporating health-related quality of life into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(23), 1955–1965.
  • ICF: Międzynarodowa Klasyfikacja Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawności i Zdrowia. (2001). Geneva: Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia.
  • Jette, A.M., Tao, W., Haley, S.M. (2007). Blending activity and participation subdomains of the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(22), 1742–1750.
  • Jette, A.M. (2006). Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Physical Therapy, 86(5), 726–734.
  • Kearney, P.M., Pryor, J. (2004). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2), 162–170.
  • Khan, F., Pallant, J.F. (2007). Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to describe patient reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification of relevant environmental factors. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(1), 63–70.
  • Klejn-de Vrankrijker, M.W., de (2006). On health, ability and activity: Comments on some basic notions in the ICF. Response on some issues raised by Nordenfelt. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(23), 1475–1476.
  • Nagi, S. (1965). Some Conceptual Issues in Disability and Rehabilitation. Washington: American Sociological Association.
  • Nagi, S. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications. W: A. Pope, A. Tarlow (red.), Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention (s. 309–327). Washington: National Academy Press.
  • Nazli, A. (2012). “I’m healthy”: Construction of health in disability. Disability and Health Journal, 5, 233–240.
  • Nordenfelt, L. (2006). On health, ability and activity: Comments on some basic notions in the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(23), 1461–1465.
  • Parenboom, R.J.M., Wijlhuizen, G.J., Garre, F.G., Heerkens, Y.F., Meeteren, N.L.U., van (2012). An empirical exploration of the relations between the health components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 1556–1561.
  • Perenborn, R.J.M., Wijlhuizen, G.J., Galindo Garre, F., Heerkens, Y., Meeteren, N.L.U., van (2012). An empirical exploration of the relations between the health components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(18), 1556–1561.
  • Peterson, D.B. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2), 105–112.
  • Peterson, D.B., Kosciulek, J.F. (2005). Introduction to the special issue of Rehabilitation Education: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Rehabilitation Education, 19(2–3), 75–80.
  • Pollard, B., Johnston, M., Dieppe, P. (2011). Exploring the relationships between International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constructs of impairment, activity limitation, and participation restriction in people with osteoarthritis prior to joint replacement. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12(97), 1–8.
  • Prince, M., Patel, V., Saxena, S., Maj, M., Maselko, J., Phillips, M.R., Rahman, A. (2007). No health without mental health. Lancet, 8, 859–877.
  • Quinn, F., Johnston, M., Dixon, D., Johnston, D.W., Pollard, B., Rowley, D.I. (2012). Testing the integration of ICF and behavioral models of disability in orthopedic patients: Replication and extension. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57, 167–177.
  • Reinhardt, J.D., Miller, J., Stucki, G., Sykes, C., Gray, D.B. (2011). Measuring impact of environmental factors on human functioning and disability: A review of various scientific approaches. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(23–24), 2151–2165.
  • Rosenbaum, P., Steward, D. (2004). The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 1(11), 5–10.
  • Rouquette, A., Badley, E.M., Falissard, B., Dub, T., Leplege, A., Coste, J. (2015). Moderators, mediators, and bidirectional relationships in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework: An empirical investigation using a longitudinal design and structural equation modeling (SEM). Social Science and Medicine, 135, 133–142.
  • Salvador-Carulla, L., Garcia-Gutierrez, C. (2011). The WHO construct of health-related functioning (HrF) and its implications for health policy. BMC Public Health, 11 (Suppl. 4), 59–72.
  • Salvador-Carulla, L., Gasca, V.I. (2010). Defining disability, functioning, autonomy and dependency in person-centered medicine and integrated care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 10(5), 69–72.
  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. The Disability Studies Reader, 2, 197–204.
  • Smart, J.F. (2007). The promise of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). W: A.E. Dell Orto, P.W. Power (red.), The Psychological and Social Impact of Illness and Disability (s. 582–595). New York: NY Springer.
  • Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Melvin, J. (2007). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(4), 279–285.
  • Sullivan, K.J., Cen, S.Y. (2011). Model of disablement and recovery: Knowledge translation in rehabilitation research and practice. Physical Therapy, 91, 1892–1904.
  • Verbrugge, L.M., Jette, A.M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science Medicine, 38, 1–14.
  • Wang, P.P., Badley, E.M., Gignac, M. (2006). Exploring the role of contextual factors in disability models. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(2), 135–140.
  • Whiteneck, G., Dijkers, M.P. (2009). Difficult to measure constructs: Conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 90 (Suppl. 1), 22–35.
  • World Health Organization. (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • World Health Organization. (1997). International Classification of Impairments, Activities and Participation: Beta-1 Draft for Field Trials. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children and Youth Version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-52366c17-ca39-4a31-aeb8-aa16c02270fc
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.