Národní park Šumava: Hruška vs. Stráský, dva rozhovory z března 2011

• Authors: Hořejší Michal L.
• Languages of publication: CS

Abstracts

EN

The paper deals with the dispute about management of the Šumava National Park. The paper characterizes the discourse on the Šumava National Park on the basis of two interviews with the representatives of the contradictory positions. It analyzes the central topics, topoi and concepts by applying the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). The paper focuses on the way how both interviewees construct their opponent, how they construct the attribute “human” and in which contexts they use pronouns “we” and “they”. The paper reveals that the way of displaying the past is crucial for the identification of both dominant narratives. The basic interdiscursive relations in which the discourse on the Šumava National Park is involved are also outlined.

Keywords

CS

diskurz; diskurzivně-historická metoda; komunikace; koncept; kontext; kritická analýza diskurzu; média; národní park Šumava; stereotyp; téma

EN

CDA; communication; concept; context; DHA; discourse; medias; Šumava National Park; topic; topoi

Discipline

• PHILOLOGY_&_LINGUISTICS: PHILOLOGY & LINGUISTICS
• SOCIOLOGY: SOCIOLOGY

• Publisher: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Arts, Czech Republic
• Journal: Studie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguistics
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 47-69

Contributors

author

Hořejší Michal L.

• Ústav českého jazyka a teorie komunikace FF UK v Praze