Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 901 | 29-42

Article title

Analiza koncepcji ujęcia odroczonego podatku dochodowego w sprawozdawczości finansowej

Title variants

EN
An Analysis of Alternative Interperiod Tax Allocation Methods for Financial Reporting Purposes

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
The article analyses deferred tax allocation procedures in an important area of the contemporary accounting standards. The domestic and international standards solutions are similar, while the theory of accounting offers a range of alternative solutions. The article considers the concepts of full and partial allocation, liability method, deferred tax method, and the pros and cons of the balance sheet and income statement approach. The evaluation identifies the areas of coherence with current accounting standards and theory. It also points out those aspects which might be suitable for re-evaluation in the context of the accounting standards objectives.

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Rachunkowości, ul. Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland

References

  • Arnold A., Webb B. [1989], The Financial Reporting and Policy Effects of Partial Deferred Tax Allocation, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
  • Belkaoui A. [1998], Critical Financial Accounting Problems. Issues and Solutions, Quorum Books, Westport.
  • Beresford D. et al. [1983], Accounting for Income Taxes: A Review of Alternatives, FASB, Stamford.
  • Chandra U., Ro B. [1997], The Association between Deferred Taxes and Common Stock Risk, „Journal of Accounting and Public Policy”, nr 16.
  • Chludek A. [2011], Perceived versus Actual Cash Flow Implications of Deferred Taxes – An Analysis of Value Relevance and Reversal under IFRS, „Journal of International Accounting Research”, vol. 10, nr 1.
  • Davidson S., Rasch S., Weil R. [1984], Behavior of the Deferred Tax Credit Account 1973–82, „Journal of Accountancy”, October.
  • Górowski I. [2005], Próba weryfikacji zgodności wynikowej procedury odroczonego podatku dochodowego z teorią rachunkowości, Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, t. 30.
  • Górowski I. [2008], Bieżący i odroczony podatek dochodowy jako źródło informacji o przedsiębiorstwie, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego – Finanse, Rynki Finansowe i Ubezpieczenia, nr 14 (520).
  • Hendriksen E., Breda M. [2002], Teoria rachunkowości, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • Olchowicz I. [2011], Rachunkowość podatkowa, Difin, Warszawa.
  • Rosenfield P., Dent W. [1983], No More Deferred Taxes, „Journal of Accountancy”, February.
  • Schroeder R., Clark M., Cathey J. [2001], Accounting Theory and Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Skekel T., Fazzi Ch. [1984], The Deferred Tax Liability: Do Capital-intensive Companies Pay It?, „Journal of Accountancy”, October.
  • Ustawa o rachunkowości z dnia 29 września 1994 r., tekst jednolity Dz.U. 2002, nr 76, poz. 694 z późn. zm.
  • van Hoepen M. [1981], Anticipated and Deferred Corporate Income Tax in Companies’ Financial Statements, Kluwer, Deventer.
  • Walińska E. [2003], Rachunkowość podatków odroczonych, Fundacja Rozwoju Rachunkowości w Polsce, Warszawa.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-53e50b52-309c-447b-9f0c-b54dad457561
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.