Why refer to the Hindus in Bangladesh as a “minority”?

• Authors: Sumon Mahmudul H.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this paper I problematize the notion of majority/ minority and try to argue that much of this construction can be shown to have links with forms of colonial governmentality in South Asia. Using relevant literature, the paper discusses how categories such as “minority” or “majority” came into being and were normalized through different technologies of power in post‑colonial states such as ours. Such constructions, when taken uncritically, can pose problems for the communities to which they refer. The paper indicates that nomenclature is an important issue and one needs to be careful about the terms they use, as they may have a far‑reaching effect.

Keywords

EN

Colonialism; Governmentality; Communalism; South Asia

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 40
• Pages: 341-348

Contributors

author

Sumon Mahmudul H.

• Jahangirnagar University, Savar Dhaka, Bangladesh

References

• Bourdieu P., ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’ in idem, In Other Words. Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, trans. by M. Adamson, Stanford 1990.
• Chakrabarty D., Habitations of Modernity. Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies, Delhi 2002.
• Chatterjee P., The Nation and its Fragments. Colonial and Postcolonial Histories, Princeton 1993 (Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History).
• Chandhoke N., Review of Chatterjee, Partha, Empire and Nation: Selected Essays and Kaviraj, Sudipta, The Imaginary Institution of India: Politics and Ideas. H‑Asia, H‑Net Reviews. August, 2010, at <http://www.h‑net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=30477>.
• Cohn B.S., ‘The Census, Social Structure and Objectification in South Asia’ in idem, An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays, Delhi 1987 (Oxford India Paperbacks).
• Foucault M., ‘Governmentality’ in The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954‑1984, Vol. 3: Power, ed. J.D. Faubion, New York 2000.
• Guhathakurata M., ‘Minorities, Migration and National Identity in Bangladesh: Negotiating Power,’ The Journal of Social Studies, Vol. 121 (2009).
• Inda J.X. (ed.), Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics, Oxford 2005.
• Hayden R.M. ‘Antagonistic Tolerance: Competitive Sharing of Religious Sites in South Asia and the Balkans’, Current Anthropology, Vol. 43, No. 2 (2002).
• Kaviraj S., ‘The Imaginary Institution of India’ in P. Chatterjee, G. Pandey (eds.), Subaltern Studies, Vol. 7: Writings on South Asian History and Society, Delhi 1992.
• Khan N., ‘Review of Faisal Devji, Muslim Zion: Pakistan as a Political Idea, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013,’ American Historical Review, Vol. 119, No. 5 (2014).
• Pandey G., The Construction of Communalism in Colonial North India, Delhi 1990.
• Pandey G., ‘In Defense of the Fragment: Writing about Hindu‑Muslim Riots in India Today,’ Representations, No. 37 (1992), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2928653>.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.40.21