Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 14 | 2 | 67-86

Article title

THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENTS ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This article reviews the literature on the implementation of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in language learning, aiming at understanding how CMC environments have been implemented to foster language learning. The paper draws on 40 recent research articles selected from 10 peer-reviewed journals, 2 book chapters and one conference proceeding. It investigates the studies that have dealt with the CMC environments used for language learning, in particular the benefits of CMC in language learning; factors affecting the use of CMC in language learning, and current CMC environments used for language learning (such as emails, wikis, YouTube, Facebook). The review discusses the findings of these studies and suggests guidelines for future research studies in this area. It concludes that further studies are necessary to investigate how language teachers can integrate CMC environments and organize suitable tasks. Also, further studies are necessary to determine the principles that are required to implement CMC in language learning.

Year

Volume

14

Issue

2

Pages

67-86

Physical description

Contributors

  • Najran University, Saudi Arabia

References

  • Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(3), 199–226.
  • Absalom, M., & Rizzi, A. (2008). Comparing the outcomes of online listening versus online text-based tasks in university level Italian L2 study. ReCALL 20(1), 55–66.
  • Alastuey, M. C. B. (2011). Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(5), 419– 432.
  • Barrs, K. (2012). Fostering computer-mediated L2 interaction beyond the classroom. Language Learning & Technology 16(1), 10–25.
  • Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology 4(1), 120–136.
  • Bradley, L., Lindstro, B., & Rystedt, H. (2010). Rationalities of collaboration for language learning in a wiki. ReCALL 22(2), 247–265.
  • Brandl, K. (2012). Effects of required and optional exchange tasks in online language learning environments. ReCALL 24(1), 85–107.
  • Castaneda, D. A. (2011). The effects of instruction enhanced by video/photo blogs and wikis on learning the distinctions of the Spanish preterite and imperfect. Foreign Language Annals 44(4), 692–711.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2003) English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on Teaching and Research in the Age of Information and Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Cole, L., Beam, M., Karn, L., & Hoad-Reddick, A. (1992). Educational computer-mediated communication. A field study of recent research. Unpublished paper, Toronto, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
  • Develotte, C., Guichon, N., & Vincent, C. (2010). The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment. ReCALL 22(3), 293–312.
  • Elola, I. & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology 14(3), 51–71.
  • Freiermuth, M. R. (2001). Native speakers or non-native speakers: Who has the floor? Online and face-to-face interaction in culturally mixed small groups. Computer Assisted Language Learning 14(2), 169–199.
  • Fuente, M. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning 16(1), 47–81.
  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Skype and podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology 9(3), 9–12.
  • González-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based call to promote interaction: en busca de Esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology 7(1), 86–104.
  • Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for Science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology 15(3), 68–86.
  • Higgins, R. (1991) Computer-Mediated Cooperative Learning: Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication between Students Learning Nursing Diagnosis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto. http://www.cybercorp.net/rhiggins/thesis/
  • Hrastinski, S., & Aghaee, N. M. (2012). How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies 17(4), 451–464.
  • Hsu, H. Y, Wang, S. K. & Comac, L. (2008). Using audio blogs to assist English-language learning: an investigation into student perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(2), 181–198.
  • Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., Abidin, M., & Jafre Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education 13(4), 179–187.
  • Kitade, K. (2000). L2 Learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning 13(2), 143–166.
  • Ko, C. (2012). Can synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) help beginning-level foreign language learners speak? Computer Assisted Language Learning 25(3), 217–236.
  • Kotter, M. (2001). MOOrituri te salutant? Language learning through MOO-based synchronous exchanges between learner tandems. Computer Assisted Language Learning 14(3-4), 289–304.
  • Lamy, M. N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). Supporting language students' interactions in web-based conferencing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 12(5), 457–477.
  • Lin, W.-C., Huang, H.-T.,, & Liou, H.-C. (2013). The effects of text-based SCMC on SLA: A meta analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 123–142.
  • Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: a collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35–54.
  • Luppicini, R. (2006). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science 35(2), 141-185.
  • Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System 36(3), 437–455.
  • Metz, J. M. (1994). Computer-mediated communication: Literature review of a new context. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century 2(2), 31-49.
  • Miller, L., Hafner, C. A., & Fun, C. N. K. (2012). Project-based learning in a technologically enhanced learning environment for second language learners: Students' perceptions. E-Learning and Digital Media 9(2), 183–195.
  • Mitchell, K. (2012). A Social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal 29(3), 471–493.
  • Murphy, P. (2010). Web-based collaborative reading exercises for learners in remote locations: the effects of computer-mediated feedback and interaction. via computer-mediated communication. ReCALL 22(2), 112–134.
  • Nguyen, L. V. (2011). Learners’ reflections on and perceptions of computer- mediated communication in a language classroom: A Vietnamese perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 27(8), 1413-1436, http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/nguyen.pdf.
  • O’Bryan, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Integrating CALL into the classroom: the role of podcasting in an ESL listening strategies course. ReCALL 19(2), 162–180.
  • O'Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(3), 227–251.
  • Pellet, S. H. (2012). Wikis for building content knowledge in the foreign language classroom. CALICO Journal 29(2), 1-25, https://calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=911.
  • Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In. M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice (pp. 59–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and second language acquisition: Towards a rationale for MOO-based learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 14(5), 443–459.
  • Peterson, M. (2009). Learner interaction in synchronous CMC: a sociocultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22(4), 303–321.
  • Robert, G. J. (2005). Emerging technologies Skype and podcasting: disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology 9(3), 9-12.
  • Romiszowski A., & Mason, R. (2004). Computer-mediated communication. In: Jonassen D. (ed), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 397-431). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Schwienhorst, K. (2004). Native-speaker/non-native-speaker discourse in the MOO: Topic negotiation and initiation in a synchronous text-based environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning 17(1), 35–50.
  • Shamsudin, S., & Nesi, H. (2006). Computer-mediated communication in English for specific purposes: A case study with computer science students at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Computer Assisted Language Learning 19(4-5), 317-339.
  • Shang, H. F. (2007). An exploratory study of e-mail environment on FL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(1), 79–96.
  • Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2010). CyberDeutsch: Language production and user preferences in a Moodle virtual learning environment. CALICO Journal 28(1), 49–73, https://calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=831.
  • Suk, H., Young, &, Vrongistinos, K. (2012). Using Blackboard and Skype for mentoring beginning teachers. American Journal of Distance Education 26(3), 172–179.
  • Sykes, J. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal 22(3), 399–431, https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=142.
  • Vurdien, R. (2013). Enhancing writing skills through blogging in an advanced English as a Foreign Language class in Spain. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26(2), 126-143.
  • Wallace, R. (2003). Online learning in higher education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information 3(2), 241-280.
  • Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing- supported distance language learning. ReCALL 18(1), 122–146.
  • Warschauer, M. (2001). Online communication. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 207-212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weininger, M. J., & Shield, L. (2003). Promoting oral production in a written channel: An investigation of learner language in MOO. Computer Assisted Language Learning 16(4), 329-349.
  • Xiao, M., & Yang, X. (2005). The effects of internet-based desktop videoconference on EFL students‘ oral skills in terms of linguistic accuracy, fluency, and complexity. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005 (pp. 882–885). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous CMC- based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(1), 37–65.
  • Yanguas, I. (2010). Oral computer-mediated interaction between L2 learners: It’s about time! Language Learning & Technology 14(3), 72–93, http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2010/yanguas.pdf.
  • Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2010). The effects of task type in Synchronous Computer- Mediated Communication. ReCALL 22(1), 20–38.
  • Young, S. S. C. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 447–461, http://siti7447.tripod.com/Journals/GE6353/integrating_second_language.pdf
  • Zeng, G.., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System 37, 434–446.
  • Zorko, V. (2009). Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 25(5), 645–665, http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/zorko.html.
  • Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task effects on Focus on Form in synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. The Modern Language Journal 95(1), 115–132.
  • Tu, C. (2002). The impacts of text-based CMC on online social presence. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning 1(2), 1-24.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-5458b6f9-005f-477f-acb7-a10e9ab8c4ce
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.