PL EN


2013 | 9 | 14-31
Article title

Dobre i złe mity przywódców Polski Ludowej

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
Good and bad myths of the leaders of the People’s Poland
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
Myth is a particularly efficient political tool as it imposes an undisputedly defined way of thinking, develops patterns of social behaviours and creates the language of the ruling class and the people. Thus, politicians willingly resort to the use of myths in political discourse. The article is an attempt to present the functions that the myths play and the types of myths that can be encountered in politics. It focuses on the myths of the leaders of the Polish People’s Republic. The myth of a hero was used in the propaganda of the Polish People’s Republic to rebuild the image of the First Secretary – the hero with a revolutionary origin. As a rule, a negative myth of the former head of the party was developed to make the newly created cult seem even more impressive. One can see here the myths of the end and the myths of revival. The negative myth was connected with the myth of the end and the positive myth was associated with the myth of revival. Sometimes the revival myth connected with the First Secretary developed independently, spontaneously, in a bottom-up fashion, as in the case of the myth of Gomułka who was depicted as a good leader persecuted by the supporters of Stalinism. Contemporarily, the myth of “the good host” and patriot E. Gierek is celebrating its revival. Myths usually appear in the time of crisis and longing for the lost memories that idealise the former reality. Each new ruling party used to build the personal prestige of the new leader who should achieve a particular level of charisma after some time, the phenomenon was known as the cult of the First Secretaries. Simultaneously, each new party promised that they would rule in a better fashion, in accordance with the present programme of the party. In the time of the Polish People’s Republic, the magic formula, which could be identified with the myth of the beginning, was the slogan connected with “going back to the origins of Marxism and Leninism.” The cult of the First Secretaries combined with the idea of going back to the origins of Marxism and Leninism was to give a new impulse to the society and the government, was to authenticate the new leader and his programme connected with the Polish United Workers’ Party (Polska Partia Robotnicza). Despite doubled propaganda effort, each subsequent political crisis (1956, 1968, 1970, 1980, 1981) caused that the society had less trust in the political power. Finally, in 1989, the society decided to grand its trust to the opposition. And thus, in 1989 a new political power, with its new myth of the beginning, new saviour, and an old negative myth of the end, started to govern.
Keywords
Contributors
author
  • Uniwersytet Szczeciński
References
  • Armstrong K., Krótka historia mitu, Kraków 2005.
  • Biernat T., Mit polityczny, Warszawa 1989.
  • Campbell J., Potęga mitu, Kraków 1994.
  • Codogni P., Rok 1956, Warszawa 2006.
  • Czubiński A., Historia powszechna XX wieku, Poznań 2006.
  • Eliade M., Aspekty mitu, Warszawa 1998.
  • Eliade M., Sacrum. Mit. Historia, Warszawa 1993.
  • Filipowicz S., Mit i spektakl władzy, Warszawa 1988.
  • Komunizm ideologia, system, ludzie, red. T. Szarota, Warszawa 2001.
  • Lata 1970–1980. Nowe perspektywy a realia na Pomorzu Zachodnim, red. H. Komarnicki i K. Kozłowski, Szczecin 2001.
  • Mity historyczno-polityczne wyobrażenia zbiorowe polityka historyczna. Studia i materiały, t. I, red. E. Ponczek, A. Sepkowski, Toruń 2010.
  • Mity i stereotypy w polityce. Przeszłość i teraźniejszość, red. A. Kasińska-Metryka i M. Gołaś, Toruń 2010.
  • Nowak-Jeziorański J., Polska w oddali. Wspomnienia, t. II: 1956–1976, Kraków 1992.
  • Otto G., Destrukcyjna charyzma Adolfa Hitlera, Warszawa 2006.
  • Rakowski M.F., Jak to się stało, Warszawa 1991.
  • Sielski J., Przywódcy polityczni Polski Ludowej. Analiza politologiczna, „Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica VI” 2011, nr 91.
  • Szwarc A., Urbański M., Wieczorkiewicz P., Kto rządził Polską? Warszawa 2007.
  • Torańska T., Oni, Warszawa 1997.
Notes
PL
Jerzy Sielski
prof. Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego i Akademii Jana Długosza w Częstochowie. Kierownik
Zakładu Systemów Politycznych i Teorii Polityki Instytutu Politologii i Europeistyki
US i Dyrektor Instytutu Nauk Politycznych AJD w Częstochowie. Jego zainteresowania
koncentrują się na zagadnieniu teorii polityki, decydowania politycznego, osobowości
politycznej, teoretycznych aspektów funkcjonowania polskiego systemu partyjnego.
Ogółem opublikował ok. 100 prac naukowych.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-572d6428-9b1c-45c1-9a4b-3e84a115ed47
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.