PL EN


2017 | 13 | 3(38) | 34-49
Article title

Osiągnięcia szkolne czwartoklasistów w oddziałach o różnym składzie wiekowym

Content
Title variants
EN
Academic achievement of fourth-graders in classes of different age composition
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
Are hopes pinned on mixed-age grouping in preschool and elementary school substantiated by scientific data? The answer was looked for in TIMSS 2015 research in Poland. It was carried on in the middle of the reform of school entry age which lowered it from seven to six year of life. In the country representative sample of fourth-graders 17.8 percent of pupils entered school at the age of six. In 254 classrooms the dispersion of age varied from 0.20 to 0.65 years and was greater than in TIMSS 2011 (0.15–0.40). The analysis of achievement in mathematics and science was performer by means of hierarchical linear models with the control of pupils’ gender, age, initial skills, and SES, as well as school’s location and class size. The achievement in mathematics was correlated significantly negative with the dispersion of age in the class. The younger pupils scored the highest in mathematics and science in classes with moderate dispersion. The results do not support a belief that mixed-age grouping is beneficial to academic achievement.
Year
Volume
13
Issue
Pages
34-49
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-09-30
Contributors
  • Wszechnica Świętokrzyska
References
  • Ansari A., Purtell, K., Gershoff E. (2015), Classroom age composition and the school readiness of 3- and 4-year-olds in the Head Start program. „Psychological Science”, 27(1).
  • Bailey D.B., Burchinal M.R., McWilliam R.A. (1993), Age of peers and early childhood development. „Child Development”, 64.
  • Bell E.R., Greenfield D.B., Bulotsky-Shearer R.J. (2013), Classroom age composition and rates of change in school readiness for children enrolled in Head Start. „Early Childhood Research Quarterly”, 28(1).
  • Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2012). Oświata i wychowanie w roku szkolnym 2011/2012. Warszawa, Autor.
  • Goodlad J.I., Anderson R.H. (1987), The nongraded elementary school (wydanie poprawione). New York, Harcourt, Brace.
  • Guo Y., Tompkins V., Justice L., Petscher Y. (2014), Classroom age composition and vocabulary development among at-risk preschoolers. “Early Education and Development”, 25(7).
  • Hanushek E.A., Kain, J.F., Markman J.M., Rivkin S.G. (2003), Does peer ability affect student achievement? „Journal of Applied Econometrics”, 18.
  • Henry G.T., Rickman D.K. (2007), Do peers influence children’s skill development in preschool? „Economics of Education Review”, 26.
  • Justice L.M., Petscher Y., Schatschneider C., Mashburn, A. (2011), Peer effects in preschool classrooms: Is children’s language growth associated with their classmates’ skills? „Child Development”, 82(6).
  • Kallery M., Loupidou Th. (2016), Learning science in small multi-age groups: the role of age composition. „International Journal of Science Education”. 38(9).
  • Katz L.G., Evangelou D., Hartman, J.A. (1990), The case for mixed-age grouping in early education. Washington, DC, National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  • Konarzewski K. (2013), Wiek startu szkolnego a osiągnięcia w nauce w okresie wczesnoszkolnym. „Edukacja”, 4(124).
  • Konarzewski K. (2015), Zróżnicowanie umiejętności początkowych w klasie pierwszej a efekt względnego wieku w klasie trzeciej. „Edukacja”, 133(2).
  • Konarzewski K, Bulkowski K. (red.) (2016), TIMSS 2015. Wyniki międzynarodowego badania osiągnięć czwartoklasistów w matematyce i przyrodzie. Warszawa, IBE.
  • Langlois J.H., Gottfried N.W., Barnes B.M., Hendricks D.E. (1978), The effect of peer age on the social behavior of preschool children. „The Journal of Genetic Psychology”, 132.
  • Leuven E., Rønning M. (2012), Classroom grade composition and pupil achievement. „Discussion Papers”, 722, Statistics Norway Research Department.
  • Lougee M.D., Grueneich R., Hartup W.W. (1977), Social interaction in same- and mixed-age dyads of preschool children. „Child Development”, 48.
  • Martin M.O., Mullis I.V.S., Foy P., Hooper M. (2016), TIMSS 2015 International results in science. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
  • Mashburn A.J., Justice L.M., Downer J.T., Pianta R.C. (2009), Peer effects on children’s language achievement during pre-kindergarten. „Child Development”, 80(3).
  • Mason D.A., Burns R.B. (1996), “Simply no worse and simply no better” may simply be wrong: A critique of Veeman’s conclusion about multigrade classes. „Review of Educational Research”, 66(3).
  • Moller A.C., Forbes-Jones, E., Hightower A.D. (2008), Classroom age composition and developmental change in 70 urban preschool classrooms. „Journal of Educational Psychology”, 100(4).
  • Mullis I.V.S., Martin M.O., Foy P., Hooper M. (2016), TIMSS 2015 International results in mathematics. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Student Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
  • Oshima T.C., Domaleski Ch. S. (2006), Academic performance gap between summer-birthday and fall-birthday children in grades K–8. „Journal of Educational Research”, 99(3).
  • Pokropek A. (2013), Efekt rówieśników w nauczaniu szkolnym. Warszawa, IBE.
  • Quail A., Smyth S. (2014), Multigrade teaching and age composition of the class: The influence on academic and social outcomes among students. „Teaching and Teacher Education”, 43.
  • Pęczkowski R. (2010), Funkcjonowanie klas łączonych w polskim systemie edukacji. Rzeszów, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.
  • Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S. (2002), Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods (wyd. 2). Thousand Oaks, Sage.
  • Sims D. (2008), A strategic response to class size reduction: Combination classes and student achievement in California. „Journal of Policy Analysis and Management”, 27(3).
  • Thomas D.E., Bierman K.L., Powers C.J. (2011), The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive-disruptive behavior. „Child Development”, 82(3).
  • Urberg K.A., Kaplan M.G. (1986), Effects of classroom age composition on the play and social behaviors of preschool children. „Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology”, 7.
  • Veenman S. (1995), Cognitive and noncognitive effects of muitigrade and multi-age classes: A bestevidence synthesis. „Review of Educational Research”, 65(4).
  • Veenman S. (1996), Effects of nultigrade and nulti-age classes reconsidered. „Review of Educational Research”, 66(3).
  • Wilkinson I.A.G., Hattie J.A., Parr J.M., Townsend M.A.R. (2000), Influence of peer effects on learning outcomes: A review of the literature. Auckland, Auckland UniServices Ltd.
  • Winsler A., Caverly S. L, Willson-Quayle A., Carlton M. P, Howell Ch., Long G.N. (2002), The social and behavioral ecology of mixed-age and same-age preschool classrooms: A natural experiment. „Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology”, 23(3).
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1734-1582
ISSN
e-ISSN 2451-2230
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-57a5c7dd-8d0e-49e8-9845-f405eabefa73
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.