PL EN


2019 | 19 | 2 | 3-20
Article title

DEVELOPING ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILLS THROUGH SIMULATION-BASED INSTRUCTION

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Foreign language teachers and researchers face a major challenge enabling students’ learning. Not only must they provide training in the target language, but they must also find ways to optimise class time and enhance students’ communication skills in the target language. How does technology intersect with English teaching in ways that benefit learning? A possible approach would align with integrating web-based strategies and optimising class time through new methodologies, techniques and resources. In this study, a group of university engineering students were taught with simulations to aid their learning of English as a foreign language. These engineering students were taught English through both class-based and a large-scale real-time web-based simulation. We present the results of quantitative analysis of students’ oral production. The goal was to show whether simulation-based instruction contributes to significant progress in oral language production in English. The results indicate that students progressed significantly in four language-related areas: vocabulary, pronunciation, variety of expression and grammar.
Year
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
3-20
Physical description
Contributors
  • Universidad Católica de Valencia
  • Universidad Católica de Valencia
References
  • Andreu-Andrés, M. A., & García-Casas, M. (2011). Perceptions of gaming as experiential learning by engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(4), 795-804.
  • Angelini, M. L. (2016). Integration of the pedagogical models “simulation” and “flipped classroom” in teacher instruction. SAGE Open, 6(1), 2158244016636430.
  • Blyth, C. (2018). Immersive technologies and language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 225-232.
  • Beckem, J. M. (2012). Bringing life to learning: Immersive experiential learning simulations for online and blended courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 61-70.
  • Burke, H., & Mancuso, L. (2012). Social cognitive theory, metacognition, and simulation learning in nursing education. The Journal of Nursing Education, 51(10), 543-548.
  • Chang, Y. C., Peng, H. Y., & Chao, H. C. (2010). Examining the effects of learning motivation and of course design in an instructional simulation game. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4), 319-339.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Council of Europe. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crookall, D., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Simulation, Gaming, and Language Learning. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
  • Crookall, D. (2010). Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simulation and Gaming, 41(6), 898-920.
  • Ekker, K. (2000). Changes in attitude towards simulation-based distributed learning. Project DoCTA: Design and use of Collaborative Telelearning Artefacts, Oslo, pp. 112–120.
  • Ekker, K. (2004). User satisfaction and attitudes towards an Internet-based simulation. In Kinshuk, D. G. Sampson, & P. Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (pp. 224–232). Lisbon: IADIS.
  • Gegenfurtner, A., Quesada-Pallarès, C., & Knogler, M. (2014). Digital simulation-based training: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1097-1114.
  • Halleck, G., & Coll-García, J. (2011). Developing problem-solving and intercultural communication: An online simulation for engineering students. Journal of Simulation/Gaming for Learning and Development, 1(1), 1-12.
  • Jones, K. (2013). Simulations: A Handbook for Teachers and Trainers. London: Routledge.
  • Klabbers, J. H. (2001). The emerging field of simulation and gaming: Meanings of a retrospect. Simulation and Gaming, 32(4), 471-480.
  • Klabbers, J. H. (2009). The Magic Circle: Principles of Gaming and Simulation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. A. (1999). Bibliography of Research on Experiential Learning Theory and the Learning Style Inventory. Department of Organizational Behavior, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
  • Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New York: Pearson Education.
  • Kriz, W. C. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation and Gaming, 34(4), 495-511.
  • Levine, G. (2004). Global simulation: A student-centered, task-based format for intermediate foreign language courses. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 26-36.
  • Matthews, C., & Marino, J. (1990). Professional Interactions: Oral Communication Skills in Science, Technology and Medicine. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Michelson, K., & Dupuy, B. (2014). Multi-storied lives: Global simulation as an approach to developing multiliteracies in an intermediate French course. L2 Journal, 6(1), 21-49.
  • O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25(1), 85-95.
  • Ranchhod, A., Gurău, C., Loukis, E., & Trivedi, R. (2014). Evaluating the educational effectiveness of simulation games: A value generation model. Information Sciences, 264 (1), 75-90.
  • Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032690.
  • Rising, B. (2009). Business simulations as a vehicle for language acquisition. In V. Guillén‐Nieto, C. Marimón‐Llorca, & C. Vargas‐Sierra (Eds.), Intercultural Business Communication and Simulation and Gaming Methodology (pp. 317–354). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Strayer, J. F. (2007). The Effects of the Classroom Flip on the Learning Environment: A Comparison of Learning Activity in a Traditional Classroom and a Flip Classroom that Used an Intelligent Tutoring System. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University. Retrieved 27 April 2018 from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1189523914.
  • Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
  • Tourón, J., Santiago, R., & Diez, A. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: Cómo convertir la escuela en un espacio de aprendizaje. Madrid: Grupo Océano.
  • Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12(1), 82-84.
  • Watts, F., García-Carbonell, A. & Rising, B. (2011). Student perceptions of collaborative work in telematic simulation. Journal of Simulation/Gaming for Learning and Development, 1(1), 1-12.
  • Wedig, T. (2010). Getting the most from classroom simulations: Strategies for maximizing learning outcomes. PS: Political Science and Politics, 43(3), 547-555.
  • Wiggins, B. E. (2012). Toward a model of intercultural communication in simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 43(4), 550-572. doi:10.1177/1046878111414486
  • Woodhouse, T. (2011). Thai University Students’ Perceptions of Simulation for Language Education. Retrieved 1 October 2017 from http://www.thaisim.org/ts2011/docs/TS11_prog-book_f.pdf.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-5975cf37-b4e4-499c-aff4-1e9556abc130
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.