PL EN


2011 | 60 | 1 | 9-40
Article title

The Evolution of European Identity: Using biographical methods to study the development of European Identity

Content
Title variants
PL
Ewolucja tożsamości europejskiej: wykorzystanie metod badań biograficznych w badaniu rozwoju tożsamości europejskiej.
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Based upon the original application to the European Commission, this article gives insights into the thinking of the Euroidentities team at the point that the project began. The question: Is the European ‘identity project’ failing? is posed in the sense that the political and economic attainments of the European Union have not been translated into a sense of identity with or commitment to Europe from the populaces that have benefited from them. The urgency of European ‘identity work’ is asserted with a number of levels for the construction of European identity being hypothesized. Euroidentities is intended to break conceptual ground by bringing together on an equal footing two apparently antagonistic views of identity – the collective and institutional and the individual and biographical – to give a more anchored and nuanced view of identity formation and transformation than either can provide on its own. Rather than following the dominant approaches to research on European identity that have been macro-theoretical and ‘top-down’, retrospective in-depth qualitative biographical interviews are planned since they provide the ideal means of gaining insight into the formation of a European identity or multiple identities from the ‘bottom up’ perspective of non-elite groups. The reliability of analysis will be buttressed by the use of contrastive comparison between cases, culminating in contrastive comparison across the national project teams between cases drawn from different ‘sensitized groups’ that provide the fieldwork structure of the project. The paper concludes with a summary of some of the more significant findings.
PL
Artykuł powstał na podstawie aplikacji złożonej do Komisji Europejskiej przez zespół Euroidentities. Punktem wyjścia było tu pytanie o aktualny status „projektu“ tożsamości europejskiej w sytuacji gdy proces integracji obejmujący sfery ekonomiczną i polityczną nie przekładał się na budowanie poczucia tożsamości europejskiej. Propozycja badawcza pokazywała, iż odgórnie zaprojektowane z perspektywy elit (top down) działania, których celem jest tworzenie tożsamości europejskiej nie znajdują odzwierciedlenia w potocznym doświadczeniu zwykłych obywateli budujących poczucie identyfikacji przez biograficzne doświadczanie Europy. Artykuł przedstawia najważniejsze założenia projektu oraz sposób jego realizacji.
Year
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
9-40
Physical description
Dates
published
2011
Contributors
author
  • Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland
  • University of Magdeburg, Germany
References
  • Anderson B. [1983], Imagined Communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
  • Avramov R. [2001], The Economic 20th Century of Bulgaria. Sofia: Fakel. (Bulg.).
  • Bourdieu P. [1999/1972], Outline of the Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Crossley N. [2001], The Phenomenological Habitus and Its Construction, “Theory and Society” 30 (1): 81–120.
  • Czyżewski M., Piotrowski A., Rokuszewska-Pawełek, A., eds. [1996, reissue 1997], Biografia a tożsamość narodowa (Biography and National Identity), University of Łódź, Łódź.
  • European Commission [2001). Third Report from the Commission of the Union 506 Final.
  • European Identity Work [by F. Schütze et al. – 2008]. European Identity Work, [in:] „Przegląd Socjologiczny”, tom LVII (2): 9–44.
  • Fuchs C. [2003], Some Implications of Pierre Bourdieu’s Works for a Theory of Social Selforganization, European Journal of Social Theory 6 (4): 387–408
  • Glaser B., Strauss A. [1967], The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine.
  • Garfinkel [1967], Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Gonzalez J.J. and Benito C. G. [2001]. Profession and Identity. The Case of Family Farming in Spain, “Sociologia Ruralis” 41 (3): 343–357.
  • Hobsbawm E., Ranger T. (eds.) [1983], The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jenkins R. [1992], Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.
  • Jamison L. [2005], The Orientation of Young Men and Women to Citizenship and European Identity. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh and the European Commission.
  • Kaźmierska K. [1999], Doświadczenia wojenne Polaków a kształtowanie tożsamości etnicznej. Analiza narracji kresowych (Polish War Experiences and the Formation of Ethnic Identity. An Analysis of Eastern Bordeland Narratives), Warszawa: IFIS PAN.
  • King A. [2000], ‘Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A “practical” critique of the habitus’. Sociological Theory 18 (3): 417–433.
  • Kłoskowska A. [1996/2001], National Cultures at the Grass-Root Level. Budapest: Central European University Press; original Polish language edition: Warszawa 1996.
  • Labrianidis L. (ed.) [2004], The Future of Europe’s Rural Peripheries. Ashgate Ecenomic Geography Series.
  • Macdonald S. (ed.) [1993], Inside European Identities. Oxford: Berg.
  • Meinhof U., Armbruste H., Rollo C. [2003], Border Discourses: Changing identities, changing times, changing stories. Southampton: University of Southampton.
  • Milan A. [2002], European Identity, Welfare State, Religion(s). Firenze: Universitá Di Firenze.
  • Paadam K., Miller, R.L. (in preparation). Bourdieu’s Insights into the Understanding of Societal Transformation.
  • Petersson B., Hellström A. [2003], The Return of the Kings: Temporality in the construction of EU identity, “European Societies” 5 (3): 235–252.
  • Reay D. [2004], ‘It’s All Becoming A Habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research, “British Journal of Sociology of Education” 25 (4): 431–444.
  • Riemann G., ed. [2006], Doing Biographical Research – A Joint Project Against the Backdrop of a Research Tradition, [in:] “Historical Social Research” 31 (3): 4–210. Especially introduction, pp. 6–28.
  • Riemann G., Schütze F. [1991], ‘Trajectory’ as a Basic Theoretical Concept for Analyzing Suffering and Disorderly Social Processes’, [in:] David R. Maines (ed.), Social Organization and Social Process. Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 333–357.
  • Risse T., Meier M. L. [2003], Europeanization, Collective Identities and Public Discourse. Florence: Robert Schumann Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute.
  • Rokuszewska - Pawełek A. [2002], Chaos i przymus. Trajektorie wojenne Polaków – analiza biograficzna (Chaos and Oppression. War Trajectories of Poles – Biographical Analysis), Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  • Schütze F. [1983]‚ Biographieforschung und narratives Interview, “Neue Praxis” 13 (3):283–293.
  • Schütze F. [1995], Verlaufskurven des Erleidens als Forschungsgegenstand der interpre-tativen Soziologie, [in:] Heinz-Hermann Krüger and Winfried Marotzki (eds.), Erziehungswissenschaftliche Biographieforschung. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, pp. 116–157.
  • Schütze F. [2008], Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives:How to Analyze Autobiographical Narrative Interviews – Part one and two, [in:] European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion, No. 1/2, pp. 153–242 and Nr. 3/4., pp. 5–77
  • Shore C. [2000], Building Europe: The cultural politics of European integration. London: Routledge.
  • Strauss A. [1987], Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vitorino A [2001], The Convention as a Model for European Constitutionalism. Speech at Humboldt University, Berlin, 14 June 2001, DN2001-06-14.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
0033-2356
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-59b37e1e-ece1-4b77-b530-f07d80e0583b
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.