PL EN


Journal
2018 | 26 | 2(102) | 13-40
Article title

Regresy podobieństwa. Podwójny relacyjny argument przeciw nominalizmowi tropowemu

Authors
Title variants
EN
Resemblance Regresses. A Double Argument against Trope Nominalism
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
Trope nominalists claim that resemblance is a primitive relation. There are two well-known arguments that aim to prove that such resemblance leads to a vicious regress. On the one hand, Bertrand Russell famously argued that resemblance relations imply an infinite series of resemblances holding between them. On the other hand, less famously, Edmund Husserl claimed that resemblance must be grounded in identity, for otherwise it falls into a vicious regress. In this paper, I argue that these arguments are intimately connected and, in fact, form a single complex case against nominalism. The point is that the standard solution to the Russell regress, which takes resemblance to be an internal relation, leads to the Husserl regress, and vice versa: a solution to the Husserl regress is possible when resemblance is taken to be an external relation, which immediately leads to the Russell regress.
Journal
Year
Volume
26
Issue
Pages
13-40
Physical description
Contributors
author
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-5a4cbe25-5484-4d44-9702-4ee8ac92d0b8
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.