Lying and the Relevance-Theoretic Explicit/Implicit Distinction

• Authors: Kisielewska-Krysiuk Marta
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The focus of the paper is on lying in verbal communication. The main aim of the paper is to examine the act of lying with reference to the explicit/implicit distinction in the cognitive, relevance-theoretic, model of utterance comprehension (cf. Sperber and Wilson [1986] 1995; 2004; Wilson and Sperber 2002; 2012), which rejected the maxim of truthfulness for the sake of the Principle of Relevance. The paper views lying in the context of interpersonal communication, as a pragmatic act and a linguistic strategy intentionally employed by the speaker to manipulate the hearer’s interpretation of an utterance. Since encoded linguistic meaning (logical form) falls far short of determining the proposition expressed by an utterance (explicature) and its implicatures, there is a potential for a liar to achieve his/her goal by influencing the interpretation process at different stages of pragmatic enrichment. Accordingly, an attempt is made in the paper to categorize lies by placing them along the explicit-implicit continuum, depending on the type of pragmatic task that is to lead the hearer to a false belief.

Keywords

EN

verbal communication; Relevance; implicature; explicit-implicit; cognitive

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 25/2
• Pages: 73-86

Contributors

author

Kisielewska-Krysiuk Marta

• University of Warsaw

References

• Antas, Jolanta. 2000. O kłamstwie i kłamaniu. Kraków: TAiWPN Universitas.
• Deferrari, Roy., ed. 1952. “Lying.” Treaties On Various Subjects. New York: Fathers of the Church. Vol. 16. 53–120.
• Barnes, John Arundel. 1994. A Pack of Lies: Towards a Sociology of Lying. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bok, Sissela. 1978. Lying: Moral Choice in Private and Public Life. New York: Random House.
• Carson, Thomas L. 2010. Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Carston, Robyn. 2009. “The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and the Limits of Explicit Communication.” International Review of Pragmatics 1.1: 35–62.
• Carston, Robyn. 2010. “Explicit Communication and “Free” Pragmatic Enrichment.” Explicit Communication: Essays on Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics. Ed. Belen Soria, and Esther Romero. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 217–287.
• Carston, Robyn, and Alison Hall. 2012. “Implicature and Explicature.” Cognitive Pragmatics. Ed. Hans-Jörg Schmid. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 47-84.
• Coleman, Linda, and Paul Kay. 1981. “Prototype Semantics: the English Verb Lie.” Language 57.1: 26–44.
• Davidson, Donald. 1985. “Deception and Division.” The Multiple Self. Ed. Jon Elster. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. 79–92.
• Grice, Paul Herbert. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. Ed. P. Cole and J. Morgan. New York: Academic Press. 41–58. Reprinted in H. P. Grice 1989. 22–40.
• Martin, Clancy., ed. 2009. The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Meibauer, Jörg. 2005. “Lying and Falsely Implicating.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399.
• Meibauer, Jörg. 2011. “On Lying: Intentionality, Implicature and Imprecision.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8.2: 277–292.
• Meibauer, Jörg. 2014a. Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton (Mouton Series in Pragmatics 14).
• Meibauer, Jörg. 2014b. “A Truth That’s Told with Bad Intent. Lying and Implicit Content.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28: 97–118.
• Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber. 2009. “Intuitive and Reflective Inferences.” Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Ed. Keith Frankish, and Jonathan St B. T. Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 149–170.
• Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber. 2011. “Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 57–74.
• Posner, Roland. 1980. “Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Connectives in Natural Language.” Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Ed. John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, and Manfred Bierisch. Dorthred: Holland. 169–203.
• Puzynina, Janina. 1981. “O znaczeniach czasownika „kłamać”.” Studia Semiotyczne XI: 107–120.
• Saul, Jennifer. 2012. Lying, Misleading, and What is Said. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sorensen, Roy. 2007. “Bald-faced Lies! Lying without the Intent to Deceive.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88: 251–264.
• Sperber, Dan. 2013. “Speakers Are Honest Because Hearers Are Vigilant: Reply to Kourken Michaelian.” Episteme 10.1: 61–71.
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. [1986] 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” Handbook of Pragmatics. Ed. Laurence Horn, and Gregory Ward. Oxford: Blackwell. 607–632.
• Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 25.4: 359–393.
• Stokke, Andreas. 2013. “Lying, Deceiving and Misleading.” Philosophy Compass 8.4: 348–359.
• Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Williams, Bernard. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Wilson, Deirdre. 2011. “Understanding and Believing.” Paper presented at the Relevance Round Table, Warsaw, May 27.
• Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111: 583– 632.
• Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.