Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2012 | 884 | 5-21

Article title

Wielopoziomowe modele stanów-cech w marketingu relacji

Authors

Title variants

EN
Multilevel State-trait Models in Relationship Service Oriented Marketing

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
The aim of the paper is to combine latent state-trait models (LS-T) and actor-partner interdependence models (APIM) in a multilevel context. In relationship and service marketing alike, situational context and the nature of buyer-seller interaction have a crucial impact on consumer satisfaction and loyalty (regarded as out variables). Additionally, customers and service providers are situated in a large institutional and hierarchical framework, which has an influence on the character and strength of multilevel adjustments.

Contributors

author
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Analizy Rynku i Badań Marketingowych, ul. Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland

References

  • Bijmolt T.H.A., Paas L.J., Vermunt J.K. [2004], Country and Consumer Segmentation: Multi-level Latent Class Analysis of Financial Product Ownership, „International Journal of Research in Marketing”, nr 21.
  • Couvoisier D.S., Eid M., Nussbeck F.W. [2007], Mixture Distributions Latent State-trait Analysis: Basic Ideas and Applications, „Psychological Methods”, nr 12(1).
  • Fox J.-P. [2005], The Multilevel IRT Using Dichotomous and Politomous Data, „British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology”, nr 58.
  • Gabrielsen G. [2001], A Multilevel Model for Preferences, „Food Quality and Preference”, nr 12.
  • Hox J.J. [2010], Multilevel Analysis, Techniques and Applications, Routledge, New York.
  • Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., Cook W.L. [2006], The Analysis of Dyadic Data, Guilford Press, New York.
  • Macintosh G., Lockshin L.S. [1997], Retail Relationship and Store Loyalty: A Multilevel Perspective, „International Journal of Research in Marketing”, nr 7/14(5).
  • Moller K. [2010], Relationships and Networks [w:] Marketing Theory. A Student Text, red. M.J. Baker, M. Saren, Sage.
  • Muthen B., Satorra A. [1995], Complex Sample Data in Structural Equation Modeling [w:] Sociological Methodology, red. P.V. Marsden, Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Olsen J.A., Kenny D.A. [2006], Structural Equation Modeling with Interchangeable Dyads, „Psychological Methods”, nr 11(2).
  • Palmatier R.W., Gopalakhrishna S., Houston M.B. [2006], Returns of Business to Business Marketing Investments: Strategies for Leveraging Profits, „Marketing Science”, nr 25(5).
  • Peugh J.L. [2010], A Practical Guide to Multilevel Modeling, „Journal of School Psychology”, nr 48.
  • Romaniuk H., Skinner C.J., Cooper P.J. [1999], Modeling Consumers’ Use of Product, „Journal of Royal Statistical Society”, nr 162(3).
  • Rószkiewicz M. [2008], Badanie związków przyczynowych w układzie wielopoziomowym w procesie parametryzacji produktu [w:] Zastosowania badań marketingowych w procesie tworzenia nowych produktów (cena–opakowanie–znak towarowy), red. S. Kaczmarczyk, M. Schultz, Dom Organizatora, Toruń.
  • Sagan A. [2009], Dynamika kontaktu usługowego – metodologiczne aspekty pomiaru i analizy jakości procesu i efektu usługi [w:] Przedsiębiorstwo i klient w gospodarce opartej na usługach, red. I. Rudawska, M. Soboń, Difin, Warszawa.
  • Sagan A. [2007], Wielopoziomowe modele strukturalne w analizie postępowania konsumentów – porównanie modeli pomiarowych, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, nr 756, Kraków.
  • Sagan A. [2010], Bayesowska rewolucja w badaniach marketingowych ze zmiennymi ukrytymi – porównanie podejść [w:] Marketing. Rozwój działań, red. D. Dąbrowski, Politechnika Gdańska.
  • Sagan A., Kowalska-Musiał M. [2008], Analiza struktury interakcji w kontakcie spotkaniowym – bayesowskie podejście w modelowaniu strukturalnym [w:] Nowe trendy w marketingu dla menedżerów, red. B. Czerwiński, Politechnika Gdańska, Gdańsk.
  • Sagan A., Rudawska I. [2007], Multilevel Dimensions of Consumer Relationships in the Healthcare Service Market. MLSEM vs MLIRT Approach [w:] Advances in Data Analysis, red. R. Decker, H.J. Lenz, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg–Berlin.
  • Steyer R., Krambeer S., Hannover W. [2004], Modeling Latent Trait-change [w:] Recent Developments on Structural Equation Models, red. K. Monfort, J. Oud, A. Satorra, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
  • Steyer R., Schmitt M.J. [1990], Latent State-trait Models in Attitude Research, „Quality and Quantity”, nr 24.
  • Vargo S.F., LuschR.F., [2008], Service-dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution, „Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, nr 36.
  • Wieseke J., Lee N., Broderick A.J., Dawson J.F., Van Dick R. [2008], Multilevel Analyses in Marketing Research: Differentiating Analytical Outcomes, „Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice”, nr 16.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-5c5b6dfb-9628-47e1-9912-7df612b1ac64
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.