Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2017 | 18 | 89-106

Article title

Techno-Transatlantic Science and Technology in Relations between the United States and Europe

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article focuses both on account technology as a factor in the twentieth-century relations of the United States and Europe and a view of transatlantic history through the lens of technology. It describes the trajectory of modernization through technology in certain characteristically transatlantic contexts – including the Cold War role, the advancement in military technologies and the international political competition. It demonstrates that technology development in many ways, provides structure for transatlantic cooperation and acting as a force reshaping political relations.

Journal

Year

Issue

18

Pages

89-106

Physical description

Contributors

References

  • Ablett, Jonathan, Erdmann, Andrew. “Follow the Money: Strategy, Scenarios, and the Global Shift in Defense Power.” McKinsey on Government. No 8, Spring 2013 (Special Issue: Defense): 28-43.
  • Acheson, Helena, León, Gonzalo. Evaluation of the EU-US Agreement on S&T, 2013. Web. October 3, 2017.
  • Appathurai, James. “Closing the Capabilities Gap.” NATO Review. No. 3, 2002. Web. October 11, 2017.
  • Barrios, Cristina, Koepf, Tobias. Re-mapping the Sahel: Transnational Security Challenges and International Responses. EUISS Report No. 19, EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris 2014. Web. October 6, 2017.
  • BILAT USA 2.0. Recommendations to Expand Participation of EU and US Businesses in Collaborative Transatlantic Research, Technology, Development and Innovation (RTDI) Projects. Web. October 15, 2017.
  • Bitzinger, Richard A. “The Globalization of the Arms Industry: The Next Proliferation Challenge.” International Security. Vol. 19, No. 2, 1994, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539199.
  • Boel, Bent. The European Productivity Agency and Transatlantic Relations, 1953-1961. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen, 2003. Web. October 11, 2017.
  • Dalsgaard, Inger H. “Making Myths about the “Merrikins”. Imagining American Ingenuity in the Jacksonan Era.” [in:] Heusser, Martin, Grabher, Gudrun (ed.). American Foundational Myths. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 2002: 42-64.
  • Dunne, Paul J., Braddon, Derek. Economic Impact of Military R&D, Bristol: University of the West of England, June 2008. Web. October 1, 2017.
  • Feigin, Judy. The Office of Special Investigations: Striving for Accountability in the Aftermath of the Holocaust, December 2006. Web. October 12, 2017.
  • Fikkers, Derek Jan, Horvat, Manfred (ed.). Basic Principles for Effective International Science, Technology and Innovations Agreements. European Commission, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2777/11479.
  • Fleurant, Aude, Wezeman, Pieter. D, Wezeman, Siemon T., Tian, Nan. Trends in International Arms Transfers 2016. SIPRI 2016. Web. October 7, 2017.
  • Fleming, Donald, Bailyn, Bernard (ed.). The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930-1960. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press 1998.
  • Fontaine, Richard, Rogers, Will. Internet Freedom. A Foreign Policy Imperative in the Digital Age. Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security, June 2011. Web. October 13, 2017.
  • Foreign Direct Investments in the United States. 2016 Report. Washington: Organization for International Investment, 2016. Web. December 12, 2016.
  • Gertler, Jeremiah. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program: Background and Issues for Congress. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, 2014. Web. October 16, 2017.
  • Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. The National Intelligence Council, 2012. Web. December 11, 2016.
  • Heap, Jeane. “Machine-Age Exposition.” The Little Review, Spring 1925. Web. October 11, 2016.
  • Herlitschka, Sabine E. Transatlantic Science and Technology: Opportunities for Real Cooperation Between Europe and the United States. New York: Springer, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4385-8.
  • Heusser, Martin, Grabher, Gudrun (ed.). American Foundational Myths. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 2002.
  • “Innovation in A&D and a Call to Action.” A&D Corporate Innovation Digest. No 1, February 15, 2016. Web. October 11, 2017.
  • Jeremy, David J (ed.). The Transfer of International Technology. Europe, Japan and the USA in the Twentieth Century. Hampshire: Edward Elgar, 1992.
  • Lehne, Stefan. The EU Global Strategy, a Triumph of Hope over Experience. Carnegie Europe, June 4, 2016. Web. October 12, 2017.
  • Logemann Jan, Nolan, Mary (ed.). More Atlantic Crossings. Washington, D.C.: GHI, 2014. Web. October 16, 2017.
  • Maier, Charles S. “The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy after World War II.” International Organization. Vol. 31, No. 4, 1977: 607-633.
  • Mathias Peter, Davis, John A. (eds.). Innovation and Technology in Europe – From the Eighteenth Century to the Present Day. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • Maurer, Tim. Cyber Norm Emergence at the United Nations. An Analysis of the UN’s Activities Regarding Cyber-security. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, September 2011. Web. October 14, 2017.
  • Middlekauff, Robert. The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789. The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
  • Neufeld, Michael J. “The Nazi Aerospace Exodus: Towards a Global, Transnational History.” History and Technology. Vol. 28, No. 1, March 2012: 49-52, https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2012.662338.
  • National Security Technology Accelerator: A Plan for Civil-Military Industry Innovation. New York: New York University, 2015.
  • NATO Defense Spending. Web. December 2, 2016.
  • Reflection Paper on the Future of European Defense. European Commission, June 7, 2017. Web. November 2, 2017.
  • Roadmap for EU – USA S&T Cooperation, European Commission, October 2016. Web. November 2, 2017.
  • Rhodes, Richard. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986.
  • Ruecker, Paul. Electronics, Information and Communication Technology: Pacemakers for Defense. Systems Development, STN ATLAS Elektronik, 2000.
  • Silberman, James M., Weiss, Charles Jr. Restructuring for Productivity: The Technical Assistance Program of the Marshall Plan as a Precedent for the Former Soviet Union. Washington: Global Technology Management, Inc. 1992.
  • SIPRI. SIPRI Yearbook 1999. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.
  • SIPRI. SIPRI Yearbook 2014. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015.
  • Smith, Karl. “Why is America so Great.” Modeled Behaviour, November 8, 2010. Web. October 16, 2017.
  • Surette, Leon. Dreams of a Totalitarian Utopia: Literary Modernism and Politics. London: Ithaca 2011.
  • Stevens, Tim. “A Cyberwar of Ideas? Deterrence and Norms in Cyberspace.” Contemporary Security Policy. Vol. 33, No. 1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.659597.
  • “The Other Marshall Plan.” The Economist. June 5, 1997. Web. November 2, 2017.
  • The Guardian, June 7, 2013. Web. November 5, 2017.
  • The White House, International Strategy for Cyberspace. Prosperity, Security, and Openness in a Networked World, Washington, DC, May 2011. Web. November 5, 2017.
  • Towards a European Global Strategy: Securing European Influence in a Changing World. European Global Strategy Report. IAI/PSIM/RIE/UI, Rome/Warsaw/Madrid/Stockholm 2013.
  • Veugelers, Reinhilde. “The Challenge of China’s Rise as a Science and Technology Powerhouse.” Bruegel Policy Contribution. No. 19, July 2017.

Document Type

Publication order reference

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-5e9e0c47-ef9e-4946-ac0a-a8a27e2c1af6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.