Konserwacja zapobiegawcza dziedzictwa archeologicznego : wprowadzenie do problematyki

• Authors: Kobyliński Zbigniew

Title variants

EN

PREVENTIVE CONSERVATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE: INTRODUCTION TO THE SUBJECT AREA

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

ICOMOS Charter for the Protection and Management o f the Archaeological Heritage issued in 1990 can be regarded as the final moment of the long-term process of formation of the belief in the archaeological branch that it is necessary to assign priority to preventive conservation in all actions undertaken towards the authentic substance of archaeological sites and relics. \\ ith regard to archaeological heritage, the strategy of preventive conservation must cover at least (lie implementation of the following rules: 1. Creation of optimum conditions of duration and exposure for the monument (elaboration of the monument protection plan). 2. Non-disturbance of the monument substance (restriction of excavation work to a necessary minimum). 3. Monitoring of the condition of the monument (conservator’s inspections and ensuring that the monument will be cared about by social caretakers of monuments). *+. Intervention in the case of any danger (carrying- -out of minimum required repair activities and legal and administrative interventions). The elaboration of the plan of long-term protection and management of the monument must be a key element of the strateg)7. Such a plan must be based on multidisciplinary scientific research aimed at understanding the fragment of the heritage that is to be covered by the conservation. This understanding covers not only an in-depth knowledge of the monument itself, but also of the historical and contemporary context in which the monument is situated, including th<‘ conditions of natural environment and social attitudes. Only with such a knowledge at our disposal can we elaborate an action plan that will allow us to retain the monument substance of the site, at the same time giving the possibility of I lie widest and most diverse use of monument values that are carried by that site. The article deals with practical problems related to the implementation of such proactive approach to the in situ conservation of architectural relics, such as th<‘ conservation of archaeological sites by refilling them with soil, ensuring of proper humidity and other soil conditions for the given site, impact of plants on the maintenance of archaeological sites, problems arising during the construction of roofs for archaeological sites, or special problems connected with the provision of access to archaeological sites for tourists. The problems discussed in the article lead to the conclusion that preventive conservation consists mainly of planning based on scientific research and anticipation of long-term results of undertaken actions.

Keywords

PL

dziedzictwo archeologiczne; konserwacja zapobiegawcza; konserwacja zapobiegawcza dziedzictwa archeologicznego; niszczenie dziedzictwa archeologicznego; niszczenie stanowisk i zabytków archeologicznych; ochrona ginących zasobów archeologicznych; filozofia konserwacji zapobiegawczej; teoria konserwacji; konserwacja in .situ; zachowanie zabytków in situ; czynniki destrukcji stanowisk archeologicznych; konstrukcje ochronne; stabilizacja warunków środowiskowych; stworzenie stabilnego mikroklimatu; europejskiej strategii konserwacji zapobiegawczej.; błędne rozwiązania ochronne; teatr grecki w Heraclea Minoa na Sycylii; błędy konserwatorskie; Villa del Casale w Piazza Armerina na Sycylii; zagrożenia dla dziedzictwa archeologicznego

• Publisher: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
• Journal: Ochrona Zabytków
• Year: 2009
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 77-104

Dates

published

2010

Contributors

author

Kobyliński Zbigniew

• dr hab., archeolog, zabytkoznawca Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk

References

• http://mternational.icomos.org/risk/irela_2000.html
• D. Planck, Ochrona zabytkow archeologicznych a badania naukowe - synonimy czy przeciwieństwa?, [w:] Ochrona dziedzictwa archeologicznego w Europie, Warszawa 1998, s. 59.
• T. Darvill, А.K. Fulton, MARS: The Monuments at Risk Survey o f England, 1995, Bournemouth-London 1998, s. 6-7.
• W.J.H. Willems, Archaeological heritage management in the Netherlands: past, present and future., [w:] Archaeological heritage management in the Netherlands. Fifty years State Service for Archaeological Investigations, Assen-Amersfoort 1997, s. 11-12;
• W.J.H. Willems, Holandia: zarządzanie dziedzictwem archeologicznym, [w:] Ochrona dziedzictwa..., jw., s. 214;
• W.J.H. Willems, Archaeology and heritage management in Europe: trends and development, „European Journal of Archaeology 1998, nr 1(3), s. 300.
• Archeologiebalans 2002, Amersfoort 2002, s. 33.
• T. Darvill, Value systems and the archaeological resource, „International Journal of Heritage Studies”, 1994, t. 1(1), s. 61.
• J. Buskin, Seven lamps o f architecture; przekład polski cyt. za: Zabytek i historia. Wokoł problemow konserwacji i ochrony zabytkow w XIX wieku. Antologia, Warszawa 2007, s. 109.
• A. Melucco Vaccaro, Philosophies favouring in situ conservation, [w:] „Mosaics make a site '. The Conservation in situ o f Mosaics on Archaeological Sites. Proceedings o f the V/th International Conference o f the International Committee for the Conservation o f Mosaics, Nicosia, Cyprus 1996, Rome 2003, s. 17.
• С. Capie, Conservation skills: judgement, method and decision making, London 2000, s. 160-169.
• B. Nardi, Zippori, Israel: the conservation o f the mosaic o f the building o f the Nile, [w:] Archaeological conservation and its consequences. Preprints o f the contributions to the Copenhagen Congress, 26-30 August 1996, London 1996, s. 127-132.
• Z. Kobyliński, Zarządzanie dziedzictwem kulturowym a koncepcja ekorozwoju, [w:] Problemy zarządzania dziedzictwem kulturowym, Warszawa 2000, s. 12-19;
• Z. Kobyliński, Archaeological sources and archaeological heritage: new vision o f the subject matter o f archaeology', [w:] Quo vadis archaeologia? И hither European archaeology in the 21st century?, Warsaw 2001, s. 76-82.
• Z. Kobyliński, Własność dziedzictwa kulturowego. Idee - problemy - kontrowersje, Warszawa 2009, s. 153-163.
• E. Eiandra, A museum amid the ruins o f a Minoan villa, „Museum”, I960, t. 13, s. 130-132;
• E. Minissi, Protection oj the mosaic pavements o f the Roman villa at Piazza Armerina (Sicily), „Museum”, 1961, t. 14, s. 128-132;
• H. Schmidt, Schutzbauten, Stuttgart 1988;
• S. Trow, The exotic mosaics o f Reading Roman villa, „Conservation Bulletin”, 1996, t. 30, s. 10-11
• E. Matero, Lessons from the Great House. Condition and treatment history as prologue to site conservation and management at Casa Grande Ruins National Monument, „Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites”, 1999, t. 3, s. 203-224;
• K. Fiero, Preserving dirt-walled structures in Mesa Verde National Park, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 5, s. 55-62;
• G. Solar, Protective shelters, [w:] „Mosaics make a site"..., jw., s. 263-274.
• Z. Kobyliński, Przełom antypozytywistyczny w archeologii a ochrona dziedzictwa archeologicznego, [w:] Archeologia w teorii i praktyce, Warszawa 2000, s. 167-186.
• R. Jakimowicz, Ochrona zabytkow przedhistorycznych, „Wiadomości Archeologiczne , 1929, t. 10, s. 1;
• por. J. Wysocki, Myśl konserwatorska w polskiej archeologii - zarys rozwoju i proba oceny stanu aktualnego, „Przegląd Regionalny”, 1997, t. 1 (1996-1997), s. 177-181:
• J. Wysocki, The protection o f the archaeological heritage in Poland in the 20th century: concepts and practices, „Archaeologia Polona , 1998. t. 35-36, s. 439-441;
• J. Wysocki, Zarys rozwoju konserwatorstwa archeologicznego w Polsce, „Ochrona i Konserwacja Zabytkow . 1998, t. 7, s. 33-42.
• T Poklewski-Koziełł, Archeologom powojennej Polski zabrakło chęci i środkow do realizacji V etapu badań: ochrony zabyikow archeologicznych, [w:] Ochrona i konserwacja dobr kultury w Polsce 1944-1989. Uwarunkowania polityczne i społeczne, Warszawa 1996, s. 237.
• zob. Z. Kobyliński. Teoretyczne podstawy konserwacji dziedzictwa archeologicznego, Warszawa 2001, s. 144-242.
• Por. K. Clark, Informed conservation. Understanding historie buildings and their landscapes for conservation, London 2001, s. 12;
• J.M. Coles, Wetlands. archaeology and conservation at AD 2001, [w:] The heritage management o f wetlands in Europe Exeter 2001, s. 180;
• D. Hayes, M. Patton, Proactive crisis-managernent .strategies and the archaeological heritage, „International Journal of I leritage Studies’ , 2001, t. 7, s. 37-58.
• por. C. Sease, A short history o f archaeological conservation, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 158.
• R. Sloggett, R. Fremantle, Preserving the past. A guide for conserving library collections, Melbourne 1995.
• B.M. Feilden, J. Jokilehto, Management guidelines for World Cultural Heritage sites, Rome 1998, s. 3, 41.
• Canadian Association for Conservation, Guidance for Practice, Internet: http://www.cac-accr.ca/ecodeth3.html
• Australian Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Material 1986, Internet: http://www.charvolant.org/ aiccm/coe.html
• http://www.english-heritage.org.uk
• J. Zilhao, T. Aubry, A.F. Carvalho, A.M. Baptista, M.V. Comes. J. Meireles, The rock art o f the Coa valley (Portugal) and its archaeological context, „Journal of European Archaeology . 1997, t. 5, s. 7-49;
• J. Zillmo, The rock art o f the Coa valley, Portugal. Significance, conservation and management, „Conservation and Management... , jw., 1998, t. 2, s. 193-206;
• A.C. Pinto Lima, F. Maia Pinto, The archaeological park o f the Coa valley, [w:] Eurorned. Rettung des Kulturerbes. Projekte rund ums Mittelmeer. Ilildesheim, Roemer-und Pelizaeus-Museum 18.6.-29.10.2000, „Schriften des I lornemann Instituts . t. 3 , Hamburg 2000, s. 75-84.
• Np. K. Barakat, The salvage o f the Abu Simbel - temples, [w:] jw., s. 137-148.
• G.P. Tilly, Engineering methods o f minimising damage and preserving archaeological remains in situ, [w:] Preserving archaeological remains in situ. Proceedings o f the conference o f lst-3rd April 1996. London 1998. s. 1-7
• T. Nixon, Practically'preserved: observations on the impact o f construction on urban archaeological deposits, tamże, s. 39-46;
• J. Oxley, Planning and the conservation o f archaeological deposits, tamże, s. 51-54;
• D.T. Shilston, S.L. Fletcher, Geotechnical engineering for the in-situ preservation o f archaeological remains, tamże, s. 8-15.
• J.M. Coles, The preservation o f archaeological sites by environmental intervention, [w:] In situ archaeological conservation. Proceedings o f meetings, April 6-13, 1986. Mexico, red. H.W.M. Hodges, Mexico-Los Angeles 1987, s. 34-35.
• The past under the plough. Papers presented at the Seminar on Plough Damage an d Archaeology held at Salisbury, February 1977, London 1980, Directorate o f Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings, Occasional Paper nr 3, zwł. zawarte w tym tomie artykuły: R A. Canham, D. Richards, R.T. Schadla-Hall, Archaeology an d agriculture in Wessex, s. 49-59;
• P.L. Drewett, The Sussex plough damage survey, s.69-73
• J. Hinchliffe, Effects of ploughing on archaeological sites: assessment o f the problem and some suggested approaches, s. 11-17.
• P.J. Reynolds, R.T. Schadla-Hall, Measurement o f plough damage and the effects o f ploughing on archaeological material, tamże, s. 114-122.
• T.А. Quine, D.E. Walling, Patterns an d rates o f contemporary soil erosion derived using caesium-137: measurement, analysis and archaeological significance, [w:] Past and present sod erosion, Oxford 1992, s. 185-196;
• D A. Davidson, I.G. Grieve, A.N. Tyler, G.J. Barclay, G.S. Maxwell, Archaeological sites: assessment o f erosion risk, „Journal of Archaeological Science’ , 1998, t. 25, s. 857-860;
• K. Wilkinson, A. Tyler, D. Davidson, I. Grieve, Quantifying the threat to archaeological sites from the erosion o f cultivated soil, „Antiquity”, 2006, t. 80. s. 658-670.
• J.M. Coles, The preservation o f archaeological..., jw., s. 46-51;
• Z. Kobyliński, Zmniejszanie się potencjału poznawczego stanowisk archeologicznych wskutek ich osuszania - niebezpieczeństwo groźne i nieznane, [w:] Przeszłość z perspektywy źrodeł materialnych i pisanych, „Archaeologia Historica Polona . 2005, t. 15/2, s. 307-333.
• zob. W. Stankowski, Rozwoj środowiska fizyczno-geograficznego Polski. Warszawa 1981, s. 192-193.
• Por. H. Behm, Zum Verhaltnis von Kulturtechnik und Bodendenkmalpflege, „Zeitschrift f. Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung“, 2000, t. 41, s. 13-18.
• http://www.ex.ac. uk/marew
• P. Szpanowski, Protection oj the archaeological heritage in Denmark: remarks from the Polish point o f view, „Archaeologia Polona”, 2000. t. 38, s. 111-152;
• P. Szpanowski, Wybrane aspekty ochrony zabytkow w Danii, [w:] Problemy zarządzania dziedzictwem..., jw., s. 257-282;
• A. Fischer, Scandinavia, [w:] The heritage..., jw., s. 47-54.
• R. Brunning, D. Hogan, J. Jones, M. Jones, E. Maltby, V. Straker, Saving the Sweet Track. The in situ preservation o f a Neolithic wooden trackway, Somerset, I K, „Conservation and Management... . jw., 2000, t. 4, s. 3-20.
• http://www.life-duemmer.niedersachsen.de
• Desiccation o f the archaeological landscape at Voorne-Putten,
• the Netherlands, Amersfoort 2002;
• G.A.M. Offenberg, Broekpolder.Eeri archeologisch monument op een UNEX-locatie, Haarlem 2003. Techniki monitorowania parametrow środowiska stanowisk nasączonych wodą omawia M. Davis, In-situ monitoring o f wet archaeological environments: a review o f available monitoring technologies, [w:] Preserving archaeological remains in situ. Proceedings o f the conference o f lst-3rd April 1996, London 1998, s. 21-25.
• S.A. Banwart. Groundwater geo chemistry in the burial environment, tamże, s. 66-72,
• C. Caple, Parameters for monitoring anoxic environments, tamże, s. 113-123,
• A.M. Pollard. The chemical nature o f the burial environment, tamże, s. 60-65,
• D.W. Hopkins, The biology of the burial environment, tamże, s. 73-85.
• R. Edwards, The effect o f changes in groundwater geochemistry on the survival of buried metal artefacts, tamże, s. 86-92
• A. Millard, Hone in the burial environment, tamże, s. 93-102.
• K. Jespersen, Extended storage o f waterlogged wood, when excavated and in situ, [w:] Preventive measures during excavation and site protection. Conference Ghent, 6-8 November 1985/ Mesures preventives en cours de fouilles et protection du site. Conference Gand, 6-8 Novembre 1985, Rome 1986, s. 147-154:
• I D. MacLeod, N.A. North, C.J. Beegle, The excavations, analysis and conservation o f shipwreck sites, tamże, s. 113-132;
• J.A. Spriggs, Hood, with an emphasis on the preservation o f in situ structures, [w:] In situ archaeological..., jw., s. 106-113;
• M. Merrett-Jones, S. Pedley, Water quality an d the degradation o f submerged timbers at three historic wreck sites in the Solent, [w:] Preserving archaeological..., jw., s. 174-186;
• I. Oxley, The in-situ preservation o f underwater sites, tamże, s. 159-173
• D. Gregory, In situ corrosion studies on the submarine Resurgam. A preliminary* assessment o f her state o f preservation, „Conservation and Management... ”, jw. , 2000, t. 4, s. 93-100.
• H.P. Chapman, W.C. Fletcher, G. Thomas, Quantifying the effects o f erosion on the archaeology of intertidal environments. A new approach and its implications for their management, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 4, s. 233-240.
• H.P. Chapman, Global warming. The implications fo r sustainable archaeological resource management, „Conservation and Management... , jw., 2002, t. 5, s. 241-245.
• Por. W. Piotrowski, W. Zajączkowski, Protecting Biskupin by an artificial barrier, „NewsWARP ”, 1993, t. 14, s. 7-11..
• C. Iainandi, Entre la mise en valeur et l'enfouissement. Alternatives de conservation des vestiges archeologiques in situ. [w:] Vestiges archeologiques: la conservation in situ. Actes du deuxieme colloque international de EICAHM, Montreal (Quebec), Canada, 11-15 octobre /994. Archaeological remains.
• In situ preservation. Proceedings o f the Second ICAHM International Conference. Montreal (Quebec) Canada, October 11-15, 1994, Ottawa 1996, s. 203-209.
• M. Corfield, Preventive conservation for archaeological sites, [w:J Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 32-37.
• Por. S. Skibiński, Zasady zabezpieczania reliktow architektury murowanej na stanowiskach archeologicznych, [w:] Pierwsza pomoc dla zabytkow archeologicznych. Warszawa 1998, s. 129-190.
• Por. D. Goodburn-Brown, R. Hughes, A review o f some conservation procedures for the reburial o f archaeological sites in London, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 65-69.
• M.F. Fry. Buried but not forgotten: sensitivity* in disposing o f major archaeological timbers, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 52-54.
• M. Leakey, J.M. Harris, Laetoli. A Pliocene site in Northern Tanzania, Oxford 1987;
• M. Demas, N. Agnew, S. Waane, J. Podanv, A. Bass, D. Kamamba, Preservation of the Laetoli hominid trackway in Tanzania, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 38-42;
• N. Agnew, Sins o f omission: diagnosis, risk assessment and decision. Lessons from three sites, [w:] Conserving the painted past. Developing approaches to wall painting conservation. Postprints o f a conference organised by English Heritage, London 2-4 December, 1999. London 2003, s. 75-84.
• C. Brandi, Teoria restauracji, Warszawa 2007.
• Por. R. Nardi, Conservation on the excavation: the Crypt o f Balbus in Rome, jw:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 91-102;
• T.C. Roby, Site conservation during excavation: treatment o f masonry, wall plaster arid floor mosaic remains o f a Byzantine church in Petra, Jordan, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 43-57;
• T.C. Roby, Site conservation during excavation: stabilization and consolidation of Roman funerary monuments in Carthage, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 149-152;
• T.C. Roby, hi situ stabilization during excavation o f Roman floor mosaics severely damaged by root growth and their condition after temporary reburial, [w:] „Mosaics make a site .... jw., s. 211-224;
• S. CarroU, G. WTiarton, Eield conservation at Karnan-Kalehoyuk: an holistic approach, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 22-26.
• Por. np. C. Mathias, Assessment o f corrosion measurements for soil samples excavated at a seventeenth-century colonial plantation site, jw:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 121-126.
• Por. K.W. Tubb, C. Sease, Sacrificing the wood for the trees - should conservation have a role in the antiquities trade?, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 193-197.
• J.A. Tuck, J.A. Logan, Archaeology and conservation: working together?, [w:] In situ archaeological..., jw., s. 56-63.
• Por. np. Albini, R., A.C. Cobau, C. Zizola, Mamshit, Israel, and San Paolino alia Regola, Rome: what cooperation or interference between archaeologist and conservator can achieve, [w:] Archaeological conservation arid its consequences, jw., s. 1-5.
• Por. np. P. Barker, Temporary shelter and site protection, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 45-49;
• F. Coarelli, G. Batocchioni, L. Romagnoli, II parco archeologico di Fregellae, [w:] / sit i archeologie!: un problemu di musealizzazione ali 'aperto. Secondo seminario di studi, Roma, gennaio 1994, Roma 1995, s. 133-144;
• R. Cosentino, F. Segna, Probierni e proposte per la musealizzazione dei sito di Aquae Caeretanae, tamże, s. 98-110;
• A. Varone, La maison pompeienne des Casti Amanti. Fouille, documentation et conservation, [w:] Vestiges archeologiques..., jw., s. 155-164;
• S. Carroll, Temporary protection oj a tel site excavation in central Turkey, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1998, t. 2, s. 155-162.
• Por. np. A. Biasiotti, Theft protection o f archaeological excavations: a test case study, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 213-221.
• G. Palumbo, Threats arid challenges to the archaeological heritage in the Mediterranean, [w:] Management planning for archaeological sites, Los Angeles, 2002, s. 9.
• C. Atzeni. M.G. Cabiddu, L. Massidda, U. Sanna, The use o f ‘stabilized earth in the conservation o f megalithic monuments, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1996, t. 1, s. 161-168.
• W. Ndoro, Restoration o f dry-stone walls at the Great Zimbabwe archaeological site, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 87-96.
• H. Schmidt, jw. i S. Ranellueci, Strutture protettwe e conservazione dei siti archeologici, Pescara 1996
• С. Jianzheng, Xian: an archaeological site museum at Banpo, „Museum”, 1981. t. 32, s. 184-187; L.l. Federico Protective coverings for archaeological sites: the case o f Pompeii, „ICOMOS Information”, 1985, t. 4, s. T12;
• H. Sultov, A site museum near Pavlikeni, Bulgaria, „Museum , 1985, t. 37, s. 136-139;
• W. Zilin, The museum o f Qin Shi Huang terracotta warriors and horses, „Museum . 1985, t. 37, s. 140-147;
• N. Agnew, M. Wade, A case study' o f a palaeontological site: the need for planning and protection, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 257-269;
• T.K.N. De Silva, Roof over a monument: Sri Lankan experience, tamże, s. 271-279;
• H. De Wiite, Protection o f a rch aeological sites: the Bruges situation and the example o f the Church o f Our Lady, tamże, s. 299-307; A. Stevens, Structures nouvelles de protection des sites archeologiques du Tiers Monde, tamże, s. 225-244;
• S. Waane, Roofs and shelters: the Tanzanian experience, tamże, s. 245-256;
• J. Jun, A museum on the site oj an ancient copper mine, „Museum”, 1986, t. 38, s. 115-119;
• A. Bruno, Protecting and preserving the column o f Marcus Aurelius, „Museum”, 1987, t. 39, s. 2-7;
• G. Fingerlin, Konservierung einer romischen Villa in Grenzach, „Denmmalpflege in Baden-Wurttemberg”, 1987, t. 16, s. 87-90;
• D. Planck, Archaologische Ausgrabungen in Waldheim a.N., Kreis Ludwigsburg, „Denkmalpflege in Baden-Wurttemberg”, 1988, t. 17, s. 1-8;
• N. Agnew, R. Coffman, Development and evaluation o f the hexashelter, [w:] The conservation o f the Orpheus Mosaic at Paphos, Cyprus, Los Angeles 1991, s. 36-41;
• S. Miura, Environmental control for rock-cliff sculptures against frost-shattering, mould growth a nd salt efflorescence, [w:] Preventive conservation. Practice, theory arid research, London 1994, s. 73-75;
• M. Albini, IIparco archeologico di De-senzano del Garda. Una esperienza cornpiuta di musealizzazione all aperto, [w:] / siti archeologia..., jw., s. 315-320;
• S. Caputi Jambrenghi, F. Radina, La valorizzazione del dolmen Frisari di Bisceglie (Bari): dall’indagine archeologica alia musealizzazione a llaperto del sito, tamże, s. 204-207;
• V.F. Nicolai, F. Balzani, // complesso monumentale di S. Ratio ad Bivium: un ipotesi di tnusealizzazione, tamże, s. 120-132; S. Stopponi, E. Mitchell, Il complesso archeologico di Cannicella ad Orvieto. Ipotesi di restauro, conservazione e valorizzazione dell area, tamże, s. 439-454;
• A. Alva Balderrama, G. ( 'hiari. Protection and conservation o f excavated structures o f mudbrick, [w:] Conservation on archaeological excavations with particular reference to the Mediterranean area, Rome 1995, s. 101-112;
• J.H. Stubbs, Protection and presentation o f excavated structures, tamże, s. 73-89;
• P.G. Bahn, R.G. Bednar ik, J. Steinbring, The Peterborough petroglyph site: reflections on massive intervention in rock art, „Rock Art Research”, 1995, t. 12, s. 29-41;
• J.E. Dimacopoulos, A shelter in the style o f a tumulus. Vergina, an underground archaeological site and museum in the type o f a crypt, Athens 1995; P. Jerome, Proposed permanent shelter for Building 5 at the Bronze Age site o f Palaikastro, Crete, „Conservation and Management...", jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 35-42;
• N. Agnew, S. Maekawa, R. Coffman, J. Meyer, Evaluation oj the preformance o f a lightweight modular site shelter. Quantitative meteorological data arid protective indices for the ‘hexashelter \ „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1996, t. 1, s. 139-150;
• P.C. Bahn, A.-S. Hygen, More on massive intervention: the Aspeberget structure, „Rock Art Research”, 1996, t. 13, s. 137-138;
• Z. Barov, C. Falter, Affordable versus optimal conservation: considerations in preserving an ancient tomb, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 11-15;
• S. Maekawa, N.H. Agnew, Investigation o f environmentally driven deterioration o f the Great Sphinx and concepts for protection, tamże, s. 116-120;
• A.C. Magdinier, Dans une bergerie de montagne Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France. Conservation et presentation des vestiges d ’un mausolee antique, [w:] Vestiges archeologiques..., jw., s. 219-226;
• G. Morganti, Dans la banlieue de Rome. La conservation d ’un paysage prehistorique, tamże, s. 93-100;
• M. Stokin, Interpretation o f a Roman villa. Research strategies and presentation, tamże, s. 251-254;
• Z. Aslan, Protective structures for the conservation and presentation oj archaeological sites, „Journal of Conservation at id Museum Studies”, 1997, I. 3, s. 9-26;
• Z. Aslan, Designing protective structures at archaeological sites. Criteria and environmental design methodology for a proposed structure at Lot's Basilica, .Iordan, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 5, s. 73-85;
• C. Doumas, Management considerations at a Mediteranean site: Akrotiri, Thera, [w:] The conservation of archaeological sites in the Mediterranean region: an international conference organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and the ./. Paul Getty Museum. 6-12 May 1995, Los Angeles 1997, s. 27-40;
• N.P. Stanley-Price, Hie Roman villa at Piazza Armerina, Sicily, tamże, s. 65-84;
• I.N.M. Wainwright, H. Sears, S. Michalski, Design o f a rock art protective structure at Petroglyphs Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada, „Journal of the Canadian Association for Conservation”, 1997, t. 22, s. 53-76;
• J.-P. Bertaux, M. Coulai, J.-M. Mechling, P. Meistersheim, J.-P Crevoisier, The gallo-Roman sanctuary at Grand, France. II. The protection an d development o f the amphitheatre, „Conservation and Management...” jw., 1998, t. 2, s. 217-228;
• M. Schmid, Protective shelters at the archaeological sites o f Mallia (Crete) and Kalavasos-Tenta (Cyprus), „Conservation and Management...”, jw. 1998, t. 2, s. 143-153;
• Ein Dach fu r Ephesos, Wien 2000;
• N. Agnew, Methodology, conservation criteria and performance evaluation for archaeological site shelters, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 5, s. 7-18;
• P. Jerome, M.R. Taylor, J. Montgomery, Evaluation o f the protective shelter at Blackwater Draw Archaeological Site, New Mexico, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 5, s. 63- 72;
• M.C. Laurenti, Research project on protective shelters for archaeological areas in Italy. A status report, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, I. 5, s. 109-115;
• C. Palumbo, Sheltering an archaeological structure in Petra. A case-study o f criteria, concepts, and implementation, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 5, s. 35-44;
• N.P. Stanley-Price, J. Jokilehto, The decision to shelter archaeological sites. Three case-studies from Sicily, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001,1. 5, s. 19-34;
• J.M. Teutonico, Protective shelters for archaeological sites in the southwest USA. Conclusions and recommendations, „Conservation and Management... , jw., 2001, t. 5, s. 87-90;
• T.D. Thompson, M.R. Taylor, Establishment o f conservation, design arid construction criteria for protective shelters at Fort Seiden State Monument, New Mexico, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 5, s. 45-54;
• N. Stanley-Price, C. Ponti, Protective enclosures for mosaic floors: a review o f Piazza Armerina, Sicily, after forty years, [w:] „Mosaics make a site”..., jw., s. 275-288;
• G. Solar, Protective shelters, tamże, s. 263-274.
• Por. np. M. Mastroroberto, The house o f C. Julius Publias in Pompei. Reasons for restoration, [w:] Vestiges archeologiques..., jw., s. 227-233.
• G. Scichilone, The site of the Cathedral at Atri: a case study o f in situ conservation o f archaeological remains, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 309-314;
• G. Scichilone, Un esempio di musealizzazione all dperto in Abruzzo: ! resti romani nella piazza del Duomo di Atri, [w:] I siti archeologici: un problemu di musealizzazione all dperto. Primo seminario di st udi, Roma, febbraio 1988, Roma 1988, s. 129-133.
• F. Minissi, jw.; E. Cilia, Esperienze di musealizzazione passata e presenti: Piazza Armerina, Murgantina, Rossornanno e Sari Francesco Bisconti, [w:] / siti archeologici..., jw., s. 262-270;
• N. Stanley-Price, The Roman villa at Piazza Armerina, Sicily, jw.;
• Por. M.C. Metallo, A.A. Poli, M. Diana, F. Persia, Modelli matematici per Ia valutazione della qualita dell aria a supporto della slvaguardia dei siti archeologici, [w:] l siti archeologici..., jw., s. 54-61,
• P. Natalucci, W. Pellegrini, La sistemazione delTarea archeologica di S. Gerusalemme a Pescara, [w:] I siti archeologici..., jw., s. 161-175.
• Por. np. W.O. Boekwijt, Salt and crack problems in the Roman bath at Heerlen an d their therapy, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 281-298.
• C. Giavarini, M.L. Santarelli, Dimensional variations of Roman masonry subjected to wetting-drying cycles, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 2001, t. 4, s. 213-218.
• Por. Np. Altieri, A., D. Poggi, S. Ricci, Mosaic pavements from the Thermae o f Caracalla (Rome): biodeterioration and methods of control, [w:] „Mosaics make a site .... jw., s. 249-262.
• J. Vouve, J. Brunet, De la protection des sites archeologiques (S. L.), gisement, fouilles et monuments prehistoriques, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 161-180;
• J.A. Herraez, M.A. Rodriguez, E. de Alvaro, The conservation of the Cueva de Altamira, [w:] Preventive conservation..., jw., s. 80-84;
• J. Brunet, J. Vouve, P. Malaurent, Reestablishing ari underground climate appropriate for the conservation o f the prehistoric paintings and engravings at Lascaux, „Conservation and Management... , jw., 2000, t. 4, s. 33-45.
• S. Maekawa, Preventive strategies for reducing the impact o f visitors on the microenvironment o f caves at the Mogao Grottoes, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 76-79.
• Por. K. Kucharczyk, E. Boriczak-Kucharczyk, Dobor materiału roślinnego przy zagospodarowaniu obiektow archeologicznych, [w:] Zabytek archeologiczny i środowisko, Białystok 1980, s. 85-96;
• A. Ciarallo, L'apporto delle scienze naturali alla conoscenza ed alla conservazione delle aree archeologiche vesuviarie, [w:] I siti archeologici..., jw., s. 220-224:
• B. Conticello, Tecnologia ed informatica nella gestione e nella conoscenza delTarea archeologica vesuviana, tamże, s. 216-219;
• A. Thorn, A. Piper, The Isle of the Dead: an integrated approach to the management and natural protection o f an archaeological site, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 190-192;
• G. Caneva, A botanical approach to the planning o f archaeological parks in Italy, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1999, t. 3, s. 127-134;
• N.F. Miller, K. Bluemel, Plants and mudbrick: preserving the Midas Tumulus at Gordion, Turkey, „Conservation and Management... . jw., 1999, t. 3, s. 225-237;
• J. Wysocki, Ochrona stanowisk archeologicznych o charakterze obronnym i własnej formie krajobrazowej, [w:] Krajobraz archeologiczny, Warszawa 1999, s. 11-23;
• K.L. Jones, Native grasslands and the .stabilization o f earthwork archaeological sites on the middle Missouri River, North Dakota, „Conservation and Management...”, jw.. 2000, t. 4, s. 139-150.
• Por. A.A. Abdurazakov, Conservation experience o f clay construction in Uzbekistan, [w:] Preventive measures..., jw., s. 81-90;
• P. French, The problem o f in situ conservation o f mudbrick and mud plaster, [w:] In situ archaeological..., jw., s. 78-83;
• F.G. Matero, A programme for the conservation o f architectural plasters in earthen ruins in the American Southwest. Fort Union National Monument, New Mexico, USA, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 5-24;
• F.G. Matero, A. Bass, Design an d evaluation o f hydraulic lime grouts for the reattachment o f lime plasters on earthen walls. „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 97-108;
• C. Selwitz, Saving the Fort Seiden ruins. The use o f a composite blend o f chemicals to stabilize fragile historic adobe, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 109-116;
• A. Mazar, The conservation and management o f mudbrick buildings at Tell Qasile, Israel, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1999, t. 3, s. 103-108.
• C. Castellanos, Chan Chan, Peru, [w:] Management planning..., jw., s. 68-82.
• Por. J. Vouve, P. Malaurent, F. Vouve, Microclimate analysis o f deteriorated wall paints with restitution o f original decoration through imaging, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1997, t. 2, s. 9-16;
• S. Cather, Assessing causes and mechanisms o f detrimental change to wall paintings, [w:] Conserving the painted past..., jw., s. 64-74;
• A. Sawdy, The role o f environmental control in reducing the rate o f salt damage in wall paintings, tamże, s. 95-109.
• M . Hachid, In situ archaeological heritage in Algeria: challenges and resources, [w :] In situ archaeological.... jw., s. 24-31;
• B.C. Bednarik, Rock art conservation in the upper Lena basin, Siberia, „Conservation and Management...”, jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 117-126;
• A. Watchman, K. Sale, K. Hogue, Conservation o f the Rendezvous Creek and Nurseryr Swamp 2 Aboriginal painting sites, Namadgi National Park. ACT, „Conservation and Management...’, jw., 1995, t. 1, s. 25-34;
• M. De la Luz Gutierrez, M., E. Hambleton, J. Hyland, N. Stanley-Price, The management o f World Heritage sites in remote areas. The Sierra de san Francisco, Baja California, Mexico, „Conservation and Management...”, jw.. 1996, t. 1, s. 209-225;
• N. Horsfall, Bare llill rock art sites. Queensland, Australia. Cooperation in indigenous site management, [w:] Vestiges archeologiques..., jw., s. 339-344;
• A. Watehman, Assessing the condition o f prehistoric rock art sites for heritage management plans, tamże, s. 293-301;
• E.M. Walderhaug Saetersdal, Fthics, politics and practices in rock art conservation. „Public Archaeology , 2000, t. 1, s. 163-180;
• N. Stanley-Price, Conservation a nd visitor management. Recent experience at rock art sites, [w :] Conserving the painted past..., jw., s. 121-131.
• Por. np. O. \\ aldeliaug. Chemical weathering at rock art sites in western Norway - which mechanisms are active and how they can be retarded?, „Journal of Archaeological Science”, 1998, t. 25, s. 789-800;
• O. Walderhaug, E. Walderhaug, Weathering o f Norwegian rock art -a critical review, „Norwegian Archaeological Review”, 1998, t. 31, s. 119-139.
• Por. G. Pwiti, G. Mvenge, Archaeologists, tourists arid rainmakers: problems in the management o f rock art sites in Zimbabwe, a case study o f Domboshava national monument. [w:] Aspects o f African archaeology, Harare 1996, s. 817-823.
• Por. S. Bowdler, Repainting Australian rock art, „Antiquity”, 1988, t. 62, s. 517-523;
• D. Mowaljarlai, P. Vinrucombe, G.K. Ward, C. Chippindale, Repainting o f images on rock in Australia and the maintenance o f Aboriginal culture, „Antiquity”, 1988, t. 62, s. 690-696;
• Por. S. Cunliffe, Documentation as a management tool. Planning for conservation, [w:] Vestiges archeologiques..., jw., s. 63-69;
• S. Sullivan, A planning model for the management o f archaeological sites, [w:] The conservation o f archaeological sites..., jw., s. 15-26:
• P. Maaranen, Questions o f management planOning and preventive conservation concerning the site management o f the archaeological heritage o f Finland, [w:] Conservation without limits, IIC Nordic Group XV Congress August 23.-26. 2000, Helsinki, Finland. Loimaa 2000, s. 137-14-5;
• M. Demas, Planning for conservation and management of archaeological sites. A value-based approach, [w:] Management planning..., jw., s. 27-54;
• R. Mason, E. Avrami, Heritage values and challenges o f conservation planning, tamże, s. 13-26.
• K. Clark, jw.; Research for protection, conservation and enhancement o f cultural heritage: opportunities for European enterprises, 4th European Commission Conference, Strasbourg, 22-24.XI.2000, Luxembourg 2002.
• M. Menicou, C. Fiori, M. Macchiarola, Examples o f deterioration following preservation works on mosaics in situ, jw:] „Mosaics make a site "..., jw., s. 225-234,
• A.B. Paterakis, Conservation: preservation versus analysis?, [w:] Archaeological conservation..., jw., s. 143-148.

Identifiers

ISSN

0029-8247