Kwestionariusz postrzeganych cech osobowości psów i kotów

• Authors: Ivanova Anna

Title variants

EN

Questionnaire to assess the personalitytraits attributed to dogs and cats

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

W artykule omówiono najważniejsze etapy tworzenia kwestionariusza postrzeganych cech osobowości psów i kotów. Narzędzie pomiaru zostało opracowane na podstawie wyników badań eksploracyjnych, w których uczestniczyło 200 właścicieli psów i 200 właścicieli kotów. Przedstawiono właściwości psychometryczne skal, które zostały osobno skonstruowane dla każdego gatunku zwierząt domowych, opracowano wytyczne dotyczące praktycznego zastosowania narzędzia, klucz, a także procedurę przeliczania wyników surowych na wyniki znormalizowane w celu postawienia diagnozy. Prezentowany kwestionariusz może być stosowany zarówno do badań ściśle naukowych, jak i w praktyce weterynaryjnej lub hodowlanej.

EN

The article discusses the most important steps in the development of scales to assess personality traits attributed to dogs and cats. The analysis is based on exploratory study which considered 200 dog owners and 200 cat owners opinions. Paper presents psychometric properties of the personality scales that were developed separately for each species, guidelines for practical application, the key and the procedure for converting the raw scores to the normalized scores for the purpose of diagnosis. The questionnaire can be used both in strictly scientific studies and in a veterinary practice or breeding.

Keywords

PL

psy; koty; postrzegane cechy osobowości; kwestionariusz; normy psychometryczne

EN

dogs; cats; attributed personality traits; questionnaire; psychometric norms

• Publisher: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Journal: Psychologiczne Zeszyty Naukowe
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 133-148

Contributors

author

Ivanova Anna

• Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II

References

• Alen, C., Bekoff, M. (1997). Species of mind: The philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. Cambridge,Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., John, O.P. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4(2), 89-118.
• Barrett, J.L., Keil, F.C. (1996). Conceptualising a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in god concepts.Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 219-47.
• Bekoff, M. (1999). Cognitive Ethology. W: W. Bechtel, G. Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science (s. 371-379). MA: Blackwell.
• Belk, R.W. (1996). Metaphoric relations with pets. Society and Animals, 4(2), 121-145.
• Bennett, P.C., Rutter, N.J., Woodhead, J.K., Howell, T.J. (w druku). Assessment of domestic cat personality,as perceived by 416 owners, suggests six dimensions. Behavioural Processes.
• Brown, S.E. (2004). The human-animal bond and self psychology: Toward a new understanding. Society & Animals, 12(1), 67-86.
• Budzińska-Wrzesień, E., Wrzesień, R., Jarmuł-Pietraszczyk, J., Świtacz, A. (2012). Therapeutic role of animals in human life: Examples of dog and cat assisted therapy. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering,19(11), 1377-1381.
• Coren, S. (1998). Why we love the dogs we do: How to find the dog that matches your personality. New York: Free Press.
• Draper, T.W. (1995). Canine analogs of human personality factors. Journal of General Psychology,122(3), 241-252.
• Gartner, M.C. (2015). Pet personality: A review. Personality and Individual Differences, 75(2015), 102-113.
• Gilbert, D.T., Malone, P.S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21-38.
• Gorbaniuk, O., Kiełb, M. (2010). Taksonomia i struktura cech osobowości przypisywanych zwierzętom domowym. Psychologia, Etologia, Genetyka, 21, 27-53.
• Gorbaniuk, O., Szczepańska, N., Suchomska, M., Ivanova, A., Zygnerska, M. (2014). Adjective markers of Polish indigenous lexical personality factors: A peer-rating study. Annals of Psychology,17(2), 307-324.
• Gosling, S.D., Bonnenburg, A.V. (1998). An integrative approach to personality research in anthrozoology: Ratings of six species of pets and their owners. Anthrozoös, 11(3), 148-156.
• Gosling, S.D., John, O. (1999). Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals: A cross-species review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(3), 69-75.
• Gosling, S.D., Kwan, V., John, O. (2003). A dog’s got personality: A cross-species comparative approach to personality judgments in dogs and humans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(6), 1161-1169.
• Guthrie, S.E. (1997). Anthropomorphism: a definition and a theory. W: R. Mitchell, N.S. Thompson, H.L. Miles (red.), Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals (s. 50-58). Albany: Suny Press.
• Hart, B.L., Hart, L.A. (1985). Selecting pet dogs on the basis of cluster analysis of breed behavior profiles and gender. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 186(11), 1, 1181-1185.
• Heider, F., Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243-249.
• Hirayoshi, S., Nakajima, S. (2009). Analysis of personality-trait structure of dogs with personality-trait descriptors. Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology, 59(1), 57-75.
• Holbrook, M.B., Stephens, D.L. Day, E., Holbrook, S.M., Strazar, G. (2001). A collective stereographic photo essay on key aspects of animal companionship: the truth about dogs and cats. Academy of
• Marketing Science Review, 2001(1). [Pobrane z: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?-doi=10.1.1.470.7981&rep=rep1&type=pdf].
• Hsu, Y., Serpell, J.A. (2003). Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring behavior and temperament traits in pet dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association,223(9), 1293-1300.
• Jones, A.C. (2008). Development and validation of a Dog Personality Questionnaire. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
• Kowalik, Ł. (2015). Humanistyczny sens antropomorfizmu. Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria, 2(94), 131-157.
• Kurzeja, A., Godawa, J. (2009). Wykorzystanie zooterapii w terapii pedagogicznej na przykładzie terapii z udziałem psa. Chowanna, 32(1): 85-96.
• Lee, J.R., Nass, C.I. (2010). Trust in computers: The computers-are-social-actors (CASA) paradigm and trustworthiness perception in human-computer communication. W: D. Latusek, A. Gerbais(red.), Trust and technology in a ubiquitous modern environment: Theoretical and methodological perspectives (s. 1-15). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
• Ley, J.M., Bennett, P., Coleman, G. (2007). Personality dimensions that emerge in companion canines. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 110(3-4), 305-317.
• Ley, J.M., Bennett, P., Coleman, G. (2009a). A refinement and validation of the Monash Canine Personality Questionnaire. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(2-4), 220-227.
• Ley, J.M., McGreevy, P., Bennett, P. (2009b). Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Monash Canine Personality Questionnaire-Revised (MCPQ-R). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 119(1-2), 85-90.
• Mirko, E., Kubinyi, E., Gacsi, M., Miklosi, A. (2012). Preliminary analysis of an adjective-based dog personality questionnaire developed to measure some aspects of personality in the domestic dog(Canisfamiliaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 138(1-2), 88-98.
• Reeves, B., Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Serpell, J.A., Hsu, Y. (2001). Development and validation of a novel method for evaluating behavior and temperament in guide dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72(4), 347-364.
• Sheppard, G., Mills, D.S. (2002). The development of a psychometric scale for the evaluation of the emotional predispositions of pet dogs. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15, 201-222.
• Van Houtte, B.A., Jarvis, P.A. (1995). The role of pets in preadolescent psychosocial development.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16(3), 463-479.
• Veevers, J.E. (1985). The social meaning of pets. Marriage & Family Review, 8(3-4), 11-30.
• Wesley, M.C., Minatrea, N.B., Watson, J.C. (2009). Animal-assisted therapy in the treatment of substance dependence. Anthrozoös, 22(2), 137-148.
• Wilsson, E., Sundgren, P.E. (1997). The use of a behavior test for selection of dogs for service and breeding. II. Heritability for tested parameters and effect of selection based on service dog characteristics.Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 54(2-3), 235-241.