A Relevance Theoretic Analysis of the Concepts of NEUROSIS and DISEASE in the Context of Psychotherapy

• Authors: Szehidewicz Elwira
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article presents a short analysis of two concepts – NEUROSIS and DISEASE1 – as used in the context of cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy carried out with two different patients. Drawing upon notions developed in Relevance Theory (Sperber and Wilson [1986] 1995), the analysis aims to provide conclusions useful to psychotherapeutic practice. The underlying proposal is that the psychotherapist’s awareness of the relevance-based features of concepts can help contribute to positive therapeutic results through the accomplishment of self-disclosure, transparency of meaning and emotional communication (Pawelczyk 2010, 62). Moreover, the analysis of the meaning of the concepts NEUROSIS and DISEASE may also be seen as supporting RT’s multilevel perspective on concepts. Different ways in which the concepts may be used in therapy are presented, including the literal, metaphorical and metonymical understandings.

Keywords

EN

psychotherapy; therapy; neurosis; concepts; Relevance

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 25/2
• Pages: 87-100

Contributors

author

Szehidewicz Elwira

• University of Social Sciences, Warsaw

References

• Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Blackwell Publishing.
• Carston, Robyn. 2010. “Explicit Communication and “Free” Pragmatic Enrichment.” Explicit Communication: Essays on Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics. Ed. Belen Soria, and Esther Romero. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 217–287.
• Carston, Robyn. 2012. “Metaphor and the Literal/Non-literal Distinction.” The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Ed. Keith Allan, and Katarzyna M. Jaszczołt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 469–494.
• Eysenck, Michael W., and Mark T. Keane. 2000. Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
• Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
• ICD-10. 2010. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related
• Health Problems 10th Revision. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/
• Mioduszewska-Crawford, Ewa. 2015. “Ad-hoc Concepts, Linguistically Encoded Meaning and Explicit Content: Some Remarks on the Relevance Theoretic Perspective.” Within Language, Beyond Theories. Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics and Corpus-based Studies. Ed. Wojciech Malec, and Marietta Rusinek. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 81–96.
• Papafragou, Anna. 1996. “Figurative Language and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction.” Language and Literature 5: 179–193.
• Papafragou, Anna. n.d. “Metonymy and Relevance.” http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.233.203&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Pawelczyk, Joanna. 2010. Talk as Therapy: Linguistic Investigations in Psychotherapy. Poznań: Pracownia Wydawnicza IFA UAM.
• Pilkington, Adrian. 2010. “Metaphor Comprehension: Some Questions for Current Accounts in Relevance Theory.” Explicit Communication: Essays on Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics. Ed. Belen Soria, and Esther Romero. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 156–172.
• Pudlinski, Christopher. 2005. “Doing Empathy and Sympathy: Caring Responses to Troubles Tellings on a Peer Support Line.” Discourse Studies 7.3: 267–288.
• Rebollar, Barbara Eizaga. 2015. “A Relevance-theoretic Perspective on Metonymy.” Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences 173: 191–198.
• Reboul, Anna. 2011. “Live Metaphors.” http://www.philosophie.ch/kevin/festschrift/
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. [1986] 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1998. “The Mapping Between the Mental and the Public Lexicon.” Thoughts and language. Ed. Peter Carruthers, and Jill Boucher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 184–200.
• Szehidewicz, Elwira. 2015. “Relevance Theory and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy Theory in the Analysis of Psychotherapeutic Discourse.” From Discourse to Morphemes. Applications of Relevance Theory. Advances in Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. Ed. Ewa Wałaszewska, and Agnieszka Piskorska. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 119–133.
• Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Wałaszewska, Ewa. 2012. “The Lexical Entry in Lexical Pragmatics – A Relevance-theoretic View.” Relevance Studies in Poland 4: 12–23.
• Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Relevance Theory.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 249–290.
• Yule, George. 1996. The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.