Glosa krytyczna do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 16 lutego 2017 r., sygn. I CSK 106/16

• Authors: Zelek Mariusz

Title variants

EN

A Critical Commentary to the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 16.2.2017, Ref. I CSK 106/16

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The commentary contains a presentation and evaluation of the arguments that were given by the Supreme Court to justify the thesis, according to which the press correction cannot be signed by the plenipotentiary of the interested person, but the person concerned must do so by delineating his or her own signature. In the article, attention was also paid to the motives that led the legislator to shape the formal requirements for press correction in such a way that one of its ele- ments must be the signature, as well as other arguments allowing, in the author’s opinion, to consider the Supreme Court’s position as incorrect.

Keywords

EN

press correction; plenipotentiary; press law; press; statement of knowledge

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
• Journal: Forum Prawnicze
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 2 (46)
• Pages: 96–106

Contributors

author

Zelek Mariusz

• Katedra Prawa Cywilnego, Handlowego i Ubezpieczeniowego Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu