Personal values, perceptions of unfairness in social exchange and happiness among young voters and non-voters in Poland

• Authors: Lidia Baran , Irena Pilch
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in phenomenon of poor political activity among young adults, manifested in large percentage of non-voters and politically non-engaged individuals. The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between voting behaviour and political preferences of young adults and their hierarchy of basic personal values, global subjective happiness and evaluations of fair and unfair treatment in social exchange. The results of the study indicate firstly, that the most important values were power, conformity and tradition, secondly, that the non-voters evaluated hedonism lower and security higher than the voters and thirdly, that value profiles for five groups of voters differed in preferences of conformity, tradition, security and hedonism. There were no significant differences between voters and non-voters in respect of global subjective happiness and evaluations of fair and unfair treatment. However, significant differences in these variables occured between electorates of specified political parties. The findings of the current research provide a psychological characteristic of young adults in terms of basic values, subjective happiness and perception of unfairness, allowing also to identify some of the possible indicators of poor political activity in this group.

Keywords

EN

personal values; young voters; non-voters

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Śląski. Wydział Nauk Społecznych
• Journal: Political Preferences
• Year: 2013
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 99-114

Contributors

author

Lidia Baran

• University of Silesia, Poland

author

Irena Pilch

• University of Silesia, Poland

References

• Barnea M., Schwartz Sh. H. (1998), Personal values and voting, “Political Psychology”, 19, pp. 17-40.
• Caprara G. V., Schwartz Sh., Capanna C., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C. (2006), Personality and politics: values, traits and political choice, “Political Psychology”, 27, pp. 1-28.
• Caprara G.. V., Schwartz Sh. H., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C. (2008), The personalization of politics. Lessons from the Italian case, “European Psychologist”, 13, pp. 157-172.
• Caprara G. V., Vecchione M., Schwartz Sh. (2009), Mediational role of values in linking personality traits to political orientation, “Asian Journal of Social Psychology”, 12, pp. 82-94.
• Cieciuch J. (2010), Nadzieja jako moderator związku poczucia koherencji z preferencjami wartości, „Kwartalnik Naukowy Towarzystwa Uniwersyteckiego Fides et Ratio”, 2, pp. 25-38.
• Cieciuch J., Zaleski Z. (2011), Polska adaptacja Portretowego Kwestionariusza Wartości Shaloma Schwartza, „Czasopismo Psychologiczne”, 17, pp. 251-262.
• Czapiński J., Panek T. (2011), Diagnoza społeczna 2011. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków. Raport, Warszawa: Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.
• Cześnik M. (2002), Partycypacja wyborcza w Polsce w latach 1991-2001, [in:]: R. Markowski (ed.), System partyjny i zachowania wyborcze, pp. 49-74, Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN.
• Cześnik M. (2009), Partycypacja wyborcza Polaków, Warszawa: Fundacja Instytutu Spraw Publicznych.
• Davidov E., Schmidt P., Schwartz Sh.H. (2008), Bringing values back in. The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries, “Public Opinion Quarterly”, 72, pp. 420-445.
• Esser F., de Vreese C. H. (2007), Comparing Young Voters’ Political Engagement in the United States and Europe, “American Behavioral Scientist”, 50, pp. 1195-1213.
• Feldman S. (2003), Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes, [in:] D.O. Sears, L. Huddy, R. Jervis (ed.), Oxford handbook of political psychology, pp. 477–508, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Frey B. S., Stutzer Alois (2000), Happiness prospers in democracy, “Journal of Happiness Studies”, 1, pp. 79–102.
• Henn M., Weinstein M., Wring D. (2002), A generation apart? Youth and political participation in Britain, “British Journal of Politics and International Relations”, 4, pp. 167-192.
• Kilburn H. W. (2009), Personal values and public opinion, “Social Science Quarterly”, 90, pp. 868-885.
• Klandermans B. (1989), Grievance interpretation and success expectations: the social construction of protest, “Social Behavior”, 4, pp. 113-125.
• Leimgruber P. (2011), Values and votes: the indirect effect of personal values on voting behavior, “Swiss Political Science Review”, 17, pp. 107-127.
• Lyubomirsky S., King L. A., Diener E. (2005), The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success?, “Psychological Bulletin”, 131, pp. 803-855.
• Lyubomirsky S., Lepper H. S. (1999), A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation, “Social Indicators Research”, 46, pp. 137-155.
• Phelps E. (2004), Young citizens and changing electoral turnout, 1964-2001, “Political Quarterly”, 75, pp. 238-248.
• Pilch I. (2011), Personal values, political preferences and voting behaviour in Polish election 2011. Unpublished research report.
• Pilch I. (2012), Wartości podstawowe a preferencje ideologiczne i decyzje wyborcze w wyborach do Sejmu 2011, „Preferencje Polityczne”, 3, pp. 127-144.
• Raciborski J. (1991), Zachowania wyborcze Polaków w warunkach zmiany systemu politycznego, [In:] J. Raciborski (ed.), Wybory i narodziny demokracji w krajach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej, Warszawa: Instytut Socjologii UW. Oficyna Wydawnicza „Forum”.
• Ramos A. (2006), Social values dynamics and socio-economic development, Portugese, “Journal of Social Science”, 3, pp. 35-64.
• Schwartz Sh. H. (1992), Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology”, 25, pp. 1–65.
• Schwartz Sh. H. (1994), Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?, “Journal of Social Issues”, 50, pp. 19-45.
• Schwartz Sh. H. (2003), A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations, [in:] Questionnaire development report of the European Social Survey, Chapter 7, pp. 259–319, http://naticent02.uuhost.uk.uu.net/questionnaire/que_development.htm, (24.04.2007).
• Schwartz Sh. H. (2006), Basic human values: Theory, measurement and applications, “Revue française de sociologie”, 47, pp. 929-968.
• Schwartz Sh. H., Sagie Galit (2000), Value consensus and importance: a cross-national study, “Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology”, 31, pp. 465-497.
• Skarżyńska K. (2005), Człowiek a polityka. Zarys psychologii politycznej, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• Szafraniec K. (2011), Dojrzewający obywatele dojrzewającej demokracji. O stylu politycznej obecności młodych, Warszawa: Instytut Obywatelski.
• Tavits M. (2008), Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being, “Comparative Political Studies”, 41, pp. 1607-1630.
• Turska-Kawa A. (2012), Aktywizacja polityczna młodych, [in:] A. Turska-Kawa (ed.), Polityka w opinii młodych. Idee-instytucje-obywatele, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, pp. 11-21.
• Walster E., Walster G. W., Berscheid E. (1978), Equity: Theory and Research, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Weitz-Shapiro R., Winters M. S. (2011), The link between voting and life satisfaction in Latin America, “Latin American Politics and Society”, 53, pp. 101-126.
• Wojciszke B., Grzelak J. (1995), Poczucie krzywdy Polaków: wzorce przeżywania, determinanty i konsekwencje, [in:] A. Biela, J. Brzeziński, T. Marek (eds.), Społeczne, eksperymentalne i metodologiczne konteksty procesów poznawczych człowieka, Poznań: Fundacja „Humaniora”.

Identifiers

DOI

10.6084/m9.figshare.729059