Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


System messages
  • Session was invalidated!

Journal

2014 | 59 | 275-284

Article title

Roszczenie regresowe państwa do innych jednostek publicznych oparte o naruszenie prawa międzynarodowego

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

EN
Recourse of the State against a Public Entity for Infringement of International Law

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The goal of this paper is to analyse the law and economics of some aspects of the application of international law. Public entities (e.g. local governments, hospitals, universities) might cause damage to individuals, which is not recoverable under domestic law, but it can be recovered under international law, be it the European Union law or other international law system. On grounds of international law, usually the state is liable for damage regardless of the true tortfeasor. The cases in mind have one factor in common. While damage is being done, a public entity acts in conviction of its actions being in accord with the law. Having no expertise in international law, even if the law is formally a part of the domestic legal system, the public entity causes damage (as defined on grounds of international law) to an individual. The individual then seeks compensation in the domestic administration of justice and in the lack of it turns to international tribunals. International disputes, however, will change the parties to the procedure. Instead of the tortfeasor, the state will take a position of the defendant. This situation creates a problem: Should the state seek compensation from the public entity? If such a public entity has a separate legal personality, the state has possibility to seek compensation from its assets. On the surface it seems rational to sue the public entity; it would put the economic burden of the damage on the true tortfeasor and serve as means of motivating the potential tortfeasors to spend extra resources in order to prevent future infringements of international law. The economic analysis shows this is not the case and that such practices might lead to inefficiencies. The inefficiencies are caused by a) cost of litigation, b) lack of specialization in interpretation of international law by public entities and c) inefficient avoidance cause by excessive spending by public entities. This paper presents an economic model that is useful in deciding whether recourse should be available between the state and other public entities. This text is as a set of guidelines for lawmakers and is not indented to provide insight related to interpretation of statutes.

Journal

Year

Volume

59

Pages

275-284

Physical description

Contributors

  • Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-6616e874-4757-4ec9-91e5-33f371263123
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.