PL EN


2016 | 3(30) | 357-368
Article title

Symbiosis stylisis trends in culture xix – early xx centuries

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL EN
Abstracts
EN
The problems of it is actual another interesting dimension of the art of reality, which is associated with the Gothic Revival. The Gothic Revival – it is not Gothic at all, as other eclectic styles. It is a cultural metaphor of imitation of Gothic tradition. The verticality by itself, like an arrow slits – all this becomes so, as we say, image, denies represent classical facade. Neorussion or Byzantine style, Neorenaissance were associated with ethnic tradition, with regeneration of ethnic culture. Ethnic culture becomes the subject of professional interests. If classicism can not see national traditions, everywhere simply and clearly put axis, that are formed by spatial syntagms, so the eclecticism fueles the interest to the national roots. We can see a certain nostalgia for our own ‟golden age”. That is, if we return to reflexive interpretations of culture, as it was mentioned above, it could be argued that it polystyle shows permanent deployment of metaphysical searches that already tend to aplently reality, to polycentrism, the center (axis) in the composition as the sole source of unity of the whole has become impossible. Here is felt a certain pluralism and a certain ‟postmodern” if it can be called postmodern, though postmodernism appears as nomination is in the middle of the XXth century
Keywords
Year
Issue
Pages
357-368
Physical description
Dates
published
2016
Contributors
  • Open International University of Human Development ‟Ukraine” Institute Philology and Communications, elenamay@hotmail.com
References
  • Chepelyk, V. (2000). Ukrainian modernist architectural/Victor Chepelyk, KNUCA, p. 378.
  • Garrott, J.G. (1983). Facilitating Experiential Learning in Environmental Design, „Design Studies”, vol. 4, № 2, p. 115–123.
  • Gasparski, W. (1984). Systems Conditioned Forms of Design eaching, „Design Methods and Theories”, vol. I8, № 2, p. 53–62.
  • Hohol, M.V. (1986). Rev. Architecture present TIME, „M.V. Hohol Coll”, vol. 7, t. 6 – M.: Hood. Lithuania, p. 61–80.
  • Kirichenko, E.I. (1982). Russian architecture 1830–1910 biennium/Ivanovna Eugene Kirichenko – M.: Arts, p. 400.
  • Lehenky, Y.G. (2005). Rev. Architecture (Essays interior design)/Yu.H. Lehenkyy – K.: KNUKiM, p. 690.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1734-2031
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-69e5b5c2-4fd1-480e-877c-3e9061a62fdf
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.