Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2015 | 222 | 79-86

Article title

Luz organizacyjny w optyce resource based view: operacjonalizacja konstruktu


Title variants

Organizational slack from resource based view perspective: an attempt to construct operationalization

Languages of publication



Artykuł podejmuję próbę operacjonalizacji konstruktu, jakim jest luz organizacyjny. Rozważania osadzone są w nurcie Resource Based View i obejmują zdefiniowanie konstruktu, wskazanie interakcji z efektywnością organizacji oraz wybrane podejścia badawcze pozwalające na jego operacjonalizację. Całość opracowania kończy podsumowanie ukierunkowujące obszary przyszłych badań oraz stopień wykorzystania konstruktu w wymiarze pragmatycznym.
The paper is making an attempt on the road to organizational slack operationalization. It is grounded in RBV (Resource Based View) of the firm. In this vein it define construct, presents interaction between organizational slack and effectiveness than it propose some construct operationalization. Finally, some research limitations are discussed specially from pragmatic point of view.






Physical description



  • Atuahene-Gima K. (2005), Resolving the Capability-Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation, “Journal of Marketing”, Vol. 69, s. 61-83.
  • Barney J. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, “Journal of Management”, No. 17, s. 99-120.
  • Bourgeois L. (1981), On the Measurement of Organizational Slack, “Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 6, No. 1, s. 29-39.
  • Cyert R.M., March J.G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
  • Daniel F., Lohrke F., Fornaciari C., Turner, R. (2004), Slack Resources and Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis, “Journal of Business Research”, Vol. 57, No. 6, s. 565-574.
  • Dimick D.E., Murray V.V. (1978), Correlates of Substantive Policy Decisions in Organizations: The Case of Human Resource Management, “Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 21, s. 611-623.
  • Geiger S.W., Cashen L.H. (2004), A Multidimensional Examination of Slack and Its Impact on Innovation, “Journal of Managerial Issues”, Vol. 14, No. 1, s. 68-84.
  • Greve H.R. (2007), Exploration and Exploitation in Product Innovation, “Industrial and Corporate Change”, Vol. 16, No. 5, s. 945-975.
  • Herold D.M., Jayaraman N., Narayanaswamy C.R. (2006), What Is the Relationship between Organizational Slack and Innovation? “Journal of Managerial Issues”, Vol. 18, No. 3, s. 372-392.
  • Huang Y.F., Chen C.J., The Impact of Technological Diversity and Organizational Slack on Innovation, “Technovation” (2010), Vol. 30, No. 7-8, s. 420-428.
  • Kmetz J.L. (1980), A Preliminary Test of Relationships between Organization Slack and Theoretically Related Variables, “Academy of Management Proceedings”, s. 246-250.
  • Nohria N., Gulati R. (2006), Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation? “Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 39, s. 1245-1264.
  • Penrose E. (2009), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009, s. 60.
  • Teece D. (2007), Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of Sustainable Enterprise Performance, “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 26, No. 13, s. 1319-1334.
  • Wefald A.J., Katz J.P., Downey R.G., Rust K.G. (2010), Organizational Slack, Firm Performance and the Role of Industry, “Journal of Managerial Issues”, Vol. 22, No. 1, s. 70-87.
  • Wernefelt B. (1995), The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After. “Strategic Management Journal”, Vol. 16, s. 171-174.

Document Type

Publication order reference



YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.