Uniwersalny wymiar miłości Boga według J 3,16

• Authors: Kubiś Adam

Title variants

EN

The Universality of God’s Love as Reflected in John 3:16

Abstracts

EN

John 3:16 is undoubtedly one of the best known and most beloved verses in all of Scripture. At the same time, when ripped from its literary, historical and theological contexts as it so often is, this verse can become merely a pious, sentimental saying bereft of its true, earth-shaking message. Thus this study provides not only an exegetical analysis of the verse, but also the exposition of its various contexts: literary (the interchange between Jesus and Nicodemus on the entrance into the kingdom of God), historical (the destruction of the Jerusalem temple and the worldwide mission of the early Church) and theological (the OT, NT and John’s Gospel concepts of God’s universal love). God’s love for the world, and the salvific mission flowing from it, are most beneficially viewed from a salvation-historical perspective, as the core Trinitarian outreach in which all are called to take part by putting faith in Jesus.

Keywords

EN

love; salvation; Johannine universalism

PL

miłość; zbawienie; uniwersalizm Janowy

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: Verbum Vitae
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 23
• Pages: 127-160

Contributors

author

Kubiś Adam

• Instytut Nauk Biblijnych KUL

References

• Aland B. & K. – J. Karavidopoulos – C.M. Martini – B.M. Metzger (red.), Novum Testamentum Graece (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft 282012).
• Apokryfy Starego Testamentu (red. R. Rubinkiewicz) (Prymasowska Seria Biblijna; Warszawa 1999).
• Augenstein J., Das Liebesgebot im Johannesevangelium und in den Johannesbriefen (BWANT 134; Stuttgart – Berlin – Köln 1993).
• Barrett C. K., The Gospel according to St John. An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text (London 21978).
• Bauer W. – F.W. Danker – W.F. Arndt – F.W. Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago, IL – London, UK 32000).
• Beasley-Murray G. R., John (WBC 36; Waco, TX 1987).
• Becker J., Das Evangelium nach Johannes. Kapitel 1–10 (Ökumenischer Taschenbuchkommentar zum Neuen Testament 4/1 – Gütersloher Taschenbücher 505; Gütersloh 1979).
• Bernard J. H., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to St. John I, (ICC; Edinburgh 1928).
• Beutler J., „So sehr hat Gott die Welt geliebt (Joh 3,16). Zum Heilsuniversalismus im Johannesevangelium”, Geist und Leben 66 (1993) 418-428.
• Blank J., Krisis. Untersuchungen zur johanneischen Christologie und Eschatologie (Freiburg im B. 1964).
• Borchert G. L., John 1–11 (The New American Commentary 25A; Nashville, TN 1996).
• Brodie T. L., The Gospel of John. A Literary and Theological Commentary (New York, NY – Oxford, UK 1993).
• Brown R. E., The Gospel of John. Introduction, Translation and Notes (AB 29; Garden City, NY 1966).
• Bruner F. D., The Gospel of John. A Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, UK 2012).
• Bulman J. M., „The Only Begotten Son”, Calving Theological Journal 16 (1981) 56-79.
• Bultmann R., The Gospel of John. A Commentary (Philadelphia, PA 1971).
• Chapters 1–4 (New York 1990).
• Coloe M. L., God Dwells with Us. Temple Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel (Collegeville, MN 2001).
• Dahms J. V., „The Johannine Use of monogenēs Reconsidered”, New Testament Studies 29 (1983) 222-232.
• Dodd C. H., The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel (Cambridge 1953).
• Du Plessis I. J., „Christ as the «Only Begotten»”, Neotestamentica 2 (1968) 22-31.
• Durand E., „lo,goj, monogenh,j et ui`o,j: Quelques implications trinitaires de la christologie johannique”, Revue des sciences philosphiques et théologiques 88 (2004) 93-103.
• Frick P., „Johannine Soteriology and Aristotelian Philosophy. A Hermeneutical Suggestion on Reading John 3,16 and 1 John 4,9”, Biblica 88 (2007) 415-421.
• Grasso S., Il Vangelo di Giovanni. Commento esegetico e teologico (Roma 2008).
• Gundry R. H. – R.W. Howell, „The Sense and Syntax of John 3:14-17 with Special Reference to the Use of ou[twj… w[ste in John 3:16”, Novum Testamentum 41 (1999) 24-39.
• Hahn F., „ui`o,j”, EDNT III, 387.
• Hatch E. – H.A. Redpath, A Concordance to the Septuagint and the Other Greek Versions of the Old Testament (Including the Apocryphal Books) II, (Oxford 1897).
• Hoskins P. M., Jesus as the Fulfillment of the Temple in the Gospel of John (Paternoster Biblical Monographs; Eugene, OR 2007).
• Jan Paweł II, Przekroczyć próg nadziei (Lublin 1994).
• Keener C. S., The Gospel of John. A Commentary (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson 2003).
• Kerr A. J., The Temple of Jesus’ Body. The Temple Theme in the Gospel of John (JSNTS 220; Sheffield 2002).
• Köstenberger A. J., „John’s Trinitarian Mission Theology”, Southern Baptist Journal of the Theology 9 (2005) 14-33.
• Köstenberger A. J., „The Destruction of the Second Temple and the Composition of the Fourth Gospel”, Challenging Perspectives on the Gospel of John (red. J. Lierman) (WUNT 2/219; Tübingen 2006) 69-108.
• Köstenberger A. J., A Theology of John’s Gospel and Letters. The Word, the Christ, the Son of God (Biblical Theology of the New Testament; Grand Rapids, MI 2009).
• Köstenberger A. J., John (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI 2004).
• Köstenberger J., „Lifting Up the Son of Man and God’s Love for the World. John 3:16 in Its Historical, Literary, and Theological Contexts”, Understanding the Times. New Testament Studies in the 21st Century. Essays in Honor of D.A. Carson on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday (red. A.J. Köstenberger – R.W. Yarbrough) (Wheaton, IL 2011).
• Kubiś A., „Poznacie prawdę i prawda was wyzwoli. Związek między Janowymi koncepcjami prawdy i wolności w świetle J 8,31-36”, Scripturae Lumen 4 (2012) 59-85.
• Kuśmirek A., Posłannictwo Jezusa Chrystusa według Czwartej Ewangelii (Rozprawy i Studia Biblijne 12; Warszawa 2003).
• Léon-Dufour X., Lecture de l’évangile de Jean. I. Chapitres 1–4 (Parole de Dieu 26; Paris 1988) 306-307.
• Lincoln A. T., The Gospel according to Saint John (Black’s New Testament Commentaries 4; London 2005).
• Lucado M., 3,16 – The Numbers of Hope (Nashville, TN 2007).
• Mędala S. , „Świat”, Egzegeza Ewangelii św. Jana. Kluczowe teksty i tematy teologiczne (red. F. Gryglewicz) (Lublin 1992) 347-368.
• Michaels J. R., The Gospel of John (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, U.K. 2010).
• Mirguet F., „Voir la mort de Jésus. Quand le «voir» se fait récit”, The Death of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel (red. G. van Belle) (BEThL 200; Leuven 2007) 469-479.
• Moody D., „God’s Only Son: The Translation of John 3:16 in the Revised Standard Version”, Journal of Biblical Literature 72 (1953) 213-219.
• Pancaro S., The Law in the Fourth Gospel. The Torah and the Gospel, Moses and Jesus, Judaism and Christianity according to John (NT.S 42; Leiden 1975).
• Pendrick G., „monogenh,j”, New Testament Studies 41 (1995) 587-600.
• Penna R., „Il motivo della ‘Aqedah sullo sfondo di Rm 8,32”, L’apostolo Paolo. Studi di esegesi e teologia (Parola di Dio. Seconda serie 12; Cinisello Balsamo 1991) 171-191.
• Penna R., „Le costruzioni del verbo pisteu,w nel Nuovo Testamento”,„Il vostro frutto rimanga” (Gv 16,16). Miscellanea per il LXX compleanno di Giuseppe Ghiberti (red. A. Passoni dell’Acqua) (SRivBib 46; Bologna 2005) 219-229.
• Poniży B., Księga Mądrości. Wstęp, przekład z oryginału, komentarz (NKB.ST 20; Częstochowa 2012).
• Popkes E. E., „The Love of God for the World and the Handing Over (Dahingabe) of his Son. Comments on the Tradition-historical Background and the Theological Function of John 3,16a in the Overall Context of Johannine Theology”, The Death of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel (red. G. Van Belle) (BEThL 200; Leuven 2007) 613-615.
• Popkes E. E., Die Theologie der Liebe Gottes in den johanneischen Schriften. Studien zur Semantik der Liebe und zum Motivkreis des Dualismus (WUNT II/197; Tübingen 2005).
• Popkes W., Christus traditus. Eine Untersuchung zum Begriff der Dahingabe im Neuen Testament (ATANT 49; Zürich – Stuttgart 1967).
• Porter S. E., „Can Traditional Exegesis Enlighten Literary Analysis of the Fourth Gospel? An Examination of the Old Testament Fulfillment Motif and the Passover Theme”, The Gospels and the Scriptures of Israel (red. C.A. Evans – W.R. Stegner) (JSNTS 104; Sheffield 1994) 396-428.
• Roberts R. L., „The Rendering of «Only Begotten» in John 3:16”, Restoration Quarterly 16 (1973) 2-22.
• Roustang F., „L’entretien avec Nicodème”, Nouvelle revue théologique 78 (1956) 337-358.
• Rusam D., „Das «Lamm Gottes» (Joh 1,29.36) und die Deutung des Todes Jesu im Johannesevangelium”, Biblische Zeitschrift 49 (2005) 60-80.
• Schnackenburg R., The Gospel according to St. John. I. Introduction and Commentary on
• Schneider G., „te,knon”, EDNT III, 342.
• Segal A. F., „«He who did not spare his own son…»: Jesus, Paul, and the Akedah”, From Jesus to Paul. Studies In Honour of Francis Wright Beare (red. P. Richardson – J.C. Hurd) (Waterloo, Canada 1984)169-174.
• Simoens Y., Secondo Giovanni. Una traduzione e un’interpretazione (Bologna 2002).
• Söding T., „«Gott ist Liebe»: 1 Joh 4,8.16 als Spitzensatz Biblischer Theologie”, Der lebendige Gott. Studien zur Theologie des Neuen Testaments. Festschrift für Wilhelm Thüsing zum 75. Geburtstag (red. T. Söding) (Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen. Neue Folge 31; Münster 1996) 306-357.
• Stauffer E., „avgapa,w”, TDNT I, 36.
• Theobald M., Das Evangelium nach Johannes. Kapitel 1–12 (Regensburger Neues Testament; Regensburg 2009).
• Vacendak R., „The Use and Abuse of John 3:16: A Review of Max Lucado’s Book 3:16 – The Numbers of Hope”, Journal of the Grace Evangelical Society 21/40 (2008) 77-90.
• Weder H., „Die Asymmetrie des Rettenden. Überlegungen zu Joh 3,14-21 im Rahmen johanneischer Theologie”, Einblicke ins Evangelium. Exegetische Beiträge zur neutestamentlichen Hermeneutik. Gesammelte Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1980-1991 (Göttingen 1992) 439-440.
• Wengst K., Das Johannesevangelium. I. Kapitel 1–10 (ThKNT 4; Stuttgart – Berlin – Köln 2004).
• Wengst R., Christologische Formeln und Lieder des Urchristentums (Studien zum Neuen Testament 7; Gütersloh 1972).
• Westcott B. F., The Gospel according to St. John. The Authorized Version with Introduction and Notes (London 1892).
• Witetschek S., „Die Stunde des Lammes? Christologie und Chronologie in Joh 19,14”, Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 87 (2011) 127-187.