The Influence of Emotional and Non-emotional Concepts Activation on Information Processing and Unintentional Memorizing

• Authors: Monika Pawłowska , Ewa Magier-Łakomy
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the work is to compare mechanisms of semantic and emotional processing and memory. Targets (words and non-words) were primed (100 ms) by category name (semantic in Experiment 1 and emotional in Experiment 2). The congruency of prime and target was manipulated. The reaction time of lexical decisions and the effects of unintentional memorizing of word targets were measured. Activation of semantic (Experiment 1) and emotional (Experiment 2) nodes leads to faster processing of related concepts: congruent targets are processed faster than incongruent. Processing congruent primed emotional concepts depends on their modality: anger and joy words are processed faster than sadness. Thus, congruently primed activating emotional concepts are processed differently from congruently primed deactivating concepts. The effectiveness of unintentional memory of emotional and non-emotional concepts (words) is based on different mechanisms: congruently primed emotional words are better remembered than incongruently primed. The results are discussed in the framework of spreading activation theory and theory of emotional memory.

Keywords

EN

semantic concepts; cognitive representation of emotion; congruency effect; lexical decision task (LTD); priming effect; priming paradigm; unintentional memorizing

• Publisher: Committee for Psychological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Polish Psychological Bulletin
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 42
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 150-159

Contributors

author

Monika Pawłowska

• Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty in Sopot, 81-745 Sopot, Poland

author

Ewa Magier-Łakomy

• Gdańsk School of Banking, Faculty of Finance and Management, Poland

References

• Antos, S. J. (1979). Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 527-545.
• Baumeister, R. F. Bratslavsky, E. Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good.Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
• Bless, H., Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., Golisano, V., Rabe, C., & Wolk, M. (1996). Mood and the use of scripts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665-679.
• Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
• Browne, B. L., Lawson, A. L., & Abramson, Ch. I. (2006). Effects of exposure duration on lexical decision.Southeastern Journal of Psychology, 1, 24-30.
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion.Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191-215.
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (2001). Emotions. In M. Jarymowicz (Ed.):Between affect and mind.Warsaw: PAN. [in Polish]
• Carroll, N. C., & Young, A. W. (2005). Priming of emotion recognition.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 1173-1197.
• Challis, B. H., & Krane, R. V. (1988). Mood induction and the priming of semantic memory in a lexical decision task: asymmetric effect of elation and depression.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 309-312.
• Claeys, W., & Timmers, L. (1993). Some instantiations of the informational negativity effect: positive - negative asymmetry in category breadth and in estimated meaning similarity of trait adjectives.European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 111-129.
• Clark, D. M., Teasdale, J. D, Broadbent, D. E., & Martin, M. (1983). Effect of mood on lexical decision.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 21, 175-178.
• Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic memory.Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
• Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.)The heart's eye. Emotional influences in perception and attention.New York: Academic Press, Inc.
• Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita. F. (1995). The personality structure of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130-141.
• Estes, Z, & Adelman, J. S. (2008) Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision nad naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, & Balota (2006).Emotion, 8, 441-444.
• Eysenck M., & Keane, M. (2005).Cognitive Psychology: A student's handbook.Hove: Psychology Press.
• Goetz, M. C., Goetz P. W., & Robinson, M. D. (2007). What's the use of being happy? Mood states, useful objects, and repetition priming effects.Emotion, 7, 675-679.
• Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., Abrams, R. L (1996). Three cognitive markers of uncioncious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699-1702.
• Gross, C. I. (2006).Mood congruent memory: effects on a lexical decision task and free recall task.A thesis submitted for the degree of bachelor of science in psychology. The University of British Columbia.
• Kemp-Wheeler,S. M.& Hill,A. B.(1992). Semantic and emotional priming below objective detection threshold.Cognition and Emotion, 6, 113-128.
• Klinger, M. N., Burton, P., Pitts, S. (2000). Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2, 441-455.
• Kolanczyk, A. (2003). Affectively determined brain. In Z. Piskorz, & T. Zaleskiewicz (Eds.).Psychology of Mind.Gdansk: GWP.[in Polish]
• Kuchinke, L (2007).Implicit and explicit recognition of emotionally valenced words.PhD unpublished thesis.www.diss.fr-berlin.de/2007/285
• Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Grubich, C., Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., & Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: An fMRI study.NeuroImage, 28, 1022-1032.
• Nabeta, T. & Kawahara, J. (2006). Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects.Memory, 14, 307-315.
• McNamara, T. P., & Holbrook, J. B. (2003). Semantic memory and priming. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.),Experimental psychology, 4, (pp. 447-474). New York: Wiley.
• Neely J. H., Keefe D. E., & Ross K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime -generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1003-1019.
• Olafson, K. M., & Ferraro, F. R. (2001). Effects of emotional state on lexical decision performance.Brain and Cognition, 45, 15-20.
• Pawlowska-Fusiara, M. (2005). Asymmetrical influence of positive and negative affect on involuntary memory. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities.[in Polish]
• Perea M., & Rosa E. (2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.Psychological Research, 66, 180-194.
• Piercey, C. D., & Rioux, N. (2008). Inconsistent mood congruent effects in lexical decision experiments.Journal of Articles in Support The Null Hypothesis, 5, 19-26.
• Plaut, D. C., Booth, J. R. (2000). Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychological Review, 4, 786-823.
• Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391.
• Ratcliff R., Gomez P., & McKoon G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.Psychological Review, 111, 159-182.
• Ratcliff R., & McKoon G. (2001). A multinomial model for short-term priming in word identification.Psychological Review 108, 835-846.
• Ray, S., & Bly, B. M. (2007). Investigating long-term semantic priming of middle- and low-familiarity category exemplars.The Journal of General Psychology, 134, 453-466.
• Ray, S., & Bly, B. M. (2008). Two routes for activation in the priming of categorical coordinates.The Journal of General Psychology, 135, 65-83.
• Robinson-Riegler, G. L., & Winton, W. M. (1996). The role of conscious recollection in recognition of affective material. Evidence for positive-negative asymmetry.The Journal of General Psychology, 123, 93-104.
• Rossel, S. L., & Nobre, A. C. (2004). Semantic priming of different affective categories.Emotion, 4, 354-363.
• Scott. K. M., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2001). Masked semantic priming of emotional information in subclinical depression.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 505-524.
• Siegle, G. J. (1996).Rumination on affect: Cause for negative attention biases in depression.Unpublished master thesis. San Diego University. San Diego CA.
• Stip, E., Lecours, A.,R., Chertkow, H., Elie, & R., O'Connor, K. (1994). Influence of affective words on lexical decision task in major depression.Journal of Psychiatric Neuroscience, 19, 202-207.
• Thomas, L., A., & LaBar, K., S. (2005). Emotional arousal enhances word repetition priming.Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1027-1047.
• Unkelbach Ch.; Fiedler K.; Bayer M.; Stegmüller M., & Danner D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36-49
• Wentura D., & Frings Ch. (2005). Repeated masked category primes interfere with related exemplars: New evidence for negative semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 108-120.
• Wentura, D. (2000). Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: Yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and Cognition, 26, 456-469.
• Winkielman, P., Knutson, B., Paulus, M., & Trujillo, J. L. (2007). Affective influence on judgments and decision: Moving towards core mechanisms.Review of General Psychology, 11, 179-192.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10059-011-0020-z