The role of religion in the foreign affairs of Sasanian Iran and the Later Roman Empire (330-630 A.D.)

• Authors: ZOUBERI Joan
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Religion’s role was prominent in the foreign relations of Byzantium and Iran. The religious element prevails throughout the entire struggle with Persia. The two empires were not just rivals on the battlefield. Along with the real war an ideological war was conducted between them, as both tried to convert people to their own religion. Zoroastrian Magi and Christian bishops became rivals in a war of propaganda where all means were used. When Constantine became Christian he created a golden opportunity to unite a wholeheartedly universalist religion and its abundance of scriptural authority and missionary impetus, with empire’s forces of political, military and economic expansion in order to create a genuine world empire. Constantine the Great was the first to use religion as a weapon to assimilate people to the Roman Empire. The dream of global domination could become a reality through the spread of Christianity. During the Sasanian era Iran was Zoroastrianized in great extent. The doctrine of Zarthustra became the privileged religion and developed into a supporting pillar of Sasanian kingship. Persecutions of Christians in Iran followed Constantine’s the Great proclamation of being the leader of all Christians in the oikoumeni. Church historians accused the Zoroastrian priests called Magi in the West as responsible for tortures and death penalties against the Christians of Iran, while Martyrologies illustrated them as having diabolical forces and immoral practices in their private lives. On the contrary secular Byzantine historians praised them as simple priests and holy men who lived in peace following their own customs. Roman propaganda, through history writing, presented the shahs Yazdegerd I, Xusrō I, and Xusrō II as having converted to Christianity or at least as Christian sympathizers. The impossibility of Persian subjects existing under the rule of any Roman prelate, had decreed the independence of the Persian Church. It was a common belief that Christian Orthodoxy was loyalty to the Roman Emperor, not to Christ, and heresy was not the display of a special variety of unchristian spirit, but an offence against the Roman State order. Christians of Persia were soon obliged to follow the customs of their own country. The King of Kings would always have the last voice, and frequently the first also in the choice of Catholicos. Byzantine historians often proceed to a religious mythmaking to justify the emperors’ policy towards the Persian rulers. During the sixth and seventh centuries religion propaganda was used in extent by both countries. In Byzantium during Heraclius’ reign we can trace a tendency to interpret events in terms of biblical prototypes.

Keywords

EN

Sasanians; Later Roman Empire; Iran; Byzantium; Christianity; Zoroastrianism

• Publisher: Instytut Historii Uniwersytet w Siedlcach
• Journal: Historia i Świat
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 121-132

Dates

published

2017

Contributors

author

ZOUBERI Joan

• British Institute of Persian Studies, Greece

References

• Agathias, History, ed. R. KEYDELL, Berlin 1967.
• Ammianus Marcellinus, Rerum Gestarum. Libri qui supersunt , tr. J. C. ROLFE, London 2006. (first publ.1940)
• Chronicon Paschale 284-628, tr. M. WHITBY, M. WHITBY, Liverpool 1989.
• Elysée, «Histoire de Vartan et de la guerre des Arméniens », tr. V. LANGLOIS, Paris 1867, 183-251.
• Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiastica, ed. E. SCHWARTZ, Th. MOMMSEN, Berlin, Leipzig, 1952.
• Eusebius, Vita Constantini, ed. F. WINKELMANN, Berlin, 1975.
• Just. Novellae. Corpus Iuris Civilis, v. III, ed. R. SCHÖLL, W. KROLL, Dublin/Zurich 1968. (9th ed.)
• Lazare de Pharbe, « Histoire d’ Arménie », tr. V. LANGLOIS, Collection des historiens anciens et modernes de l’Arménie,v.II, Paris 1867, 259-367.
• Mas’udi, Les Prairies d’ Or, tr. B. DE MEYNARD, P. DE COURTEILLE, v. II, Paris 1863.
• Menander, The History of Menander the Guardsman, tr. R. C. BLOCKLEY, Liverpool 1985.
• Pausanias, Description of Greece in four volumes with a companion volume containing maps, plans and indices, tr. W. JONES, R.E. WYCHERLEY, Cambridge 1918-1935.
• Priscus, The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire, Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus, tr. R.C. BLOCKLEY, Liverpool 1983.
• Procopius of Caesarea, History of the Wars, ed. H. B. DEWING, Cambridge, Mass. 1914-1940.
• Procopius of Caesarea, Secret History. The Anecdota of Secret History, tr. H. B. DEWING, Cambridge, Mass. 1935.
• Socrates Scholasticus Ecclesiastica Historia, ed. R. HUSSEY, Oxford 1853.
• Sozomen, Historia ecclesiastica, ed. J. Bidez, Berlin 1960.
• Synodicon Orientale, Recueil de Synodes Nestoriens, d’ après le ms Syriaque 332 de la Bibliothèque Nationale , publié par l’ Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, traduit et annoté par J. B. CHABOT, Paris 1902.
• Ṭabarī, The Sāsānids, the Byzantines, the Lakhmids, and Yemen, tr. C.E. BOSWORTH, New York 1999.
• The Armenian History Attributed to Sebeos, tr. R.W. THOMSON, comm. J. D. HOWARD-JOHNSTON, with T. GREENWOOD, Liverpool 1999.
• The Ecclesiastical History of Evagrius Scholasticus, tr. M. WHITBY, Liverpool 2000.
• The History of Theophylact Simocatta: An English translation with Introduction, tr. M. WHITBY, M. WHITBY, Oxford 1986.
• Theodoret, Historia ecclesiastica, ed. L. PARMENTIER, Leipzig 1911.
• Theophanes Confessor, Chronicle, ed. C. DE BOOR, Leipzig 1883-1885.
• Vita Maruthae, (BHG 2265) ed. tr. J. NORET, Analecta Bollandiana 91 (1973), 80-91.
• ASMUSSEN J. P. (2007), Christians in Iran, [in:] Cambridge History of Iran 3.2, E. YARSHATER (ed.)., Cambridge.
• BARNES T. (1985), Constantine and the Christians of Persia, ,,Journal of Roman Studies” 75, 126-136.
• BAUM W. (2004), Shirin, Christian-Queen-Myth of Love: A Woman of Late Antiquity. Historical Reality and Literary Effect, New Jersey.
• BLOCKLEY R. C. (1992), East Roman Foreign Policy, Leeds.
• BOYCE M. (2001), Zoroastrians: Their religious beliefs and practices, London.
• BROCK S. (1976), Christians in the Sasanian Empire: A Case of Divided Loyalties, ,,Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies” 2, 1-20,
• CANEPA M. (2009), The two eyes of the Earth: Art and Ritual of Kingship between Rome and Sasanian Iran, London.
• CHESNUT G. (1977), The first Christian Histories, Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret and Evagrius, Paris.
• CHRISTENSEN A. (1944), L’ Iran sous les Sassanides, Copenhague.
• CHRYSOS E. (1993), Räumung und Aufgabe von Reichsterritorien: Der Vertrag von 363, ,,Bönner Jahrbucher” 193, 165-202.
• DARYAEE T. (2009), Sasanian Persia, the rise and fall of an Empire, London/New York.
• EVANS J.A.S. (1996), The Age of Justinian: The circumstances of Imperial power, London.
• FOWDEN E. K.(1999), The Barbarian Plain: Saint Sergius between Rome and Iran, London.
• FOWDEN G. (1993), Empire to Commonwealth: Consequences of monotheism in late antiquity, New Jersey.
• GARSOIAN N. (1973/1974), Le role de l’ Hiérarchie Chrétienne, dans le rapports diplomatiques entre Byzance et les Sassanides, ,,Revue des études Arméniennes” 10, 119-138.
• GERO St. (1981, Barsauma of Nisibis and Persian Christianity in the fifth century, Louvain.
• GREATREX G., LIEU S. (2002), The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars, Part II, AD 363-630, London/New York.
• GUILLAUMONT A. (1969/1970), Justinien et l’ église de Perse, ,,Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 23/24, 39-66.
• HOLUM K. (1977), Pulcheria’s Crusade A.D.421/2 and the ideology of imperial victory, ,,Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies” 18, 153-172.
• JACKSON BONNER M. R. (2016), The Rebellion of Anos Azad, ,,Historia i Świat” 5, 159-165.
• KAEGI W. E. (2003), Heraclius Emperor of Byzantium, Cambridge.
• KHAVARI A. (2000), Das Bild des Königs in der Saaniden Zeit, Zürich/New York.
• LABOURT J.(1904), Le Christianisme dans l’ Empire Perse sous la dynastie Sassanide, Paris.
• Lee A. D. (1993), Information and Frontiers: Roman foreign relations in late antiquity, Cambridge.
• MCDONOUGH S. (2008), A second Constantine?The Sasanian King Yazdgard in Christian History and Historiography, ,,Journal of Late Antiquity” 1.1 (Spring)127-140.
• MOFFETT S. H. (1998), Christianity in Asia, Beginnings to 1500, New York.
• OBOLENSKY D. (1963), The principles and methods of byzantine diplomacy, [in:] Actes du XIIe Congres Intrnational d’ Etudes Byzantine, Ochride, 10-16 Septembre 1961, v. I, Beograd, 45-61.
• PEETERS P. (1946), Observations sur la Vie syriaque de Mar Aba, Catholicos de l’ église Perse (540-552), ,,Miscellanea Giovanni Mercati, Citta del Vaticaneo” 5, 69-112.
• SHLOSSER F. (1994), The Reign of the Emperor Maurikios (582-602): A Reassessment, Athens.
• VENETIS E.(2003), The Zoroastrian Priests and the Foreign Affairs of Sasanian Iran and the Later Roman Empire (5th century), ,,The International Journal of Ancient Iranian Studies” 3.1, 47-78.
• WHITBY M. (1988), The Emperor Maurice and his Historian: Theophylact Simocatta on Persian and Balkan warfare, Liverpool.
• WIESEHÖFER J. (2010), Ancient Persia form 550BC to 650AD, London,/New York.
• WIGRAM W.A. (1910), An Introduction to the History of the Assyrian Church: Or the Church of the Sassanid Empire, 100-640, London.
• ΠΑΤΟΥΡΑ Σ. (1994), Οι αιχμάλωτοι ως παράγοντες επικοινωνίας και πληροφόρησης (4ος-10ος αι.), Αθήνα.