Charles Taylor on Ethics and Liberty

• Authors: Barry Conor
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

My argument in this paper is that Charles Taylor’s view of liberty and ethics unites Isaiah Berlin’s liberal pluralism with Elizabeth Anscombe’s virtue ethics. Berlin identifies, in “Two Concepts of Liberty,” a tradition of negative liberty advocated by figures like Locke and Mill. He maintains that this concept of liberty is unique to modernity, and it is the form of liberty best suited to the political sphere. The much older concept of positive liberty, which is found in ancient philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, as well as modern thinkers like Hegel, Berlin regards as ill-suited to the political sphere. Anscombe, in “Modern Moral Philosophy,” specifically identifies and criticizes the Anglo-Saxon tradition of moral philosophy. Utilitarian thinkers like Mill are, for Anscombe, consequentialists. The virtue ethics of Aristotle gives a basis for the intrinsic goodness and badness of actions not in sentiment but reason. Charles Taylor draws upon the views of both thinkers. He advocates a liberal pluralism in a manner comparable to Berlin. However, Taylor strongly emphasizes, with Anscombe, that the most complete conception of ethical and political life must be rooted in virtue ethics and positive liberty. Thus, Taylor’s views constitute a synthesis of the approaches of his two mentors.

Keywords

EN

positive liberty; negative liberty; virtue ethics; political philosophy; history of philosophy

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski
• Journal: Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 3(9)
• Pages: 83-102

Dates

published

2019-10-31

Contributors

author

Barry Conor

• St. Thomas University

References

• Anscombe, Elizabeth. Ethics, Religion and Politics. Collected Philosophical Papers. Volume III. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.
• Anscombe, Elizabeth. Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics, edited by Mary Geach, and Luke Gormally. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2008.
• Anscombe, Elizabeth. From Parmenides to Wittgenstein. Collected Philosophical Papers. Volume I. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.
• Anscombe, Elizabeth. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
• Anscombe, Elizabeth. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind. Collected Philosophical Papers. Volume II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.
• Anscombe, Elizabeth. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33 (January 1958): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100037943.
• Anscombe, Elizabeth. “On the Frustration of the Majority Will by Fulfillment of the Majority’s Will.” In Ethics, Religion and Politics. Collected Philosophical Papers. Volume III. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, 1981.
• Anscombe, Elizabeth. “Thought and Action in Aristotle: What is ‘Practical Truth’?.” In From Parmenides to Wittgenstein. Collected Philosophical Papers. Volume I. Oxford: Blackwell; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas. Edited by Henry Hardy. London: Hogarth Press, 1979.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays. Edited by Henry Hardy. London: Hogarth Press, 1978.
• Berlin, Isaiah. “Does Political Theory Still Exist?” In Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Enlightening: Letters 1956-1960. Edited by Henry Hardy and Jennifer Holmes. London: Chatto & Windus, 2009.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty. London: Oxford University Press, 1992.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Freedom and its Betrayal: Six Enemies of Human Liberty. Edited by Henry Hardy. London: Windus & Chatto, 2002.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Karl Marx: His Life and Environment. 4th Edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1978.
• Berlin, Isaiah. “Letter to Norman Bernhaum, 8 December 1959.” In Enlightening: Letters 1956-1960. Edited by Henry Hardy and Jennifer Holmes. London: Chatto & Windus, 2009.
• Berlin, Isaiah. “Politics as a Descriptive Science.” In Political Ideas in the Romantic Age: Their Rise and Influence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Political Ideas in the Romantic Age: Their Rise and Influence on Modern Thought. Edited by Henry Hardy and Joshua Cherniss. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.
• Berlin, Isaiah. The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. Edited by Henry Hardy. London: John Murray, 1990.
• Berlin, Isaiah. The Proper Study of Mankind is Man: An Anthology of Essays. Edited by Henry Hardy and K. Haisher. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1997.
• Berlin, Isaiah. The Sense of Reality: Studies in Ideas and their History. Edited by Henry Hardy. London: Chatto & Windus, 1996.
• Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Freedom: Romantic and Liberal.” In Political Ideas in the Romantic Age: Their Rise and Influence on Modern Thought. Edited by Henry Hardy and Joshua Cherniss (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006), 155.
• Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In The Proper Study of Mankind is Man: An Anthology of Essays. Edited by Henry Hardy and Roger Hausheer. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1997.
• Berlin, Isaiah. Vico and Herder: Two Studies in the History of Ideas. London: Chatto & Windus, 1976.
• Bouchard, Gerard, and Charles Taylor. Fonder L’Avenir: Le temps de la conciliation. Rapport de la Commission de Consultation sur les Pratiques d’Acommodement Reliées aux Différences Culturelles. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec, 2008.
• DeSouza, Nigel. “Charles Taylor and Ethical Naturalism.” Unpublished Essay.
• DeSouza, Nigel. “Models of Moral Philosophy: Charles Taylor’s Critique of Jürgen Habermas.” Eidos 15, no. 1 (January 1998): 55-78.
• Laitinen, Arto. Strong Evaluation without Moral Sources: On Charles Taylor’s Philosophical Anthropology and Ethics. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211900.
• Lefebvre, George. Quatre-Vingt-Neuf. Paris: Editions Sociales, 1970.
• Lehman, Gary, “Perspectives on Taylor’s Reconciled Society: Community, Difference and Nature.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 32, no. 3 (May 2006): 347-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453706063213.
• Locke, John. Epistola de Tolerantia: A Letter on Toleration. Edited by Raymond Kiblansky, Oxford: Clarendon, 1968.
• Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. London: Dent, 1966.
• Raypan, Pathiaraj. Intention in Action: The Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe. Bern: Peter Lang, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0017-4.
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
• Redhead, Mark. “Alternative Secularisms.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 32, no. 5 (July 2006): 639-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453706064900.
• Rousseau, Jean-Jacques., Du contrat social, Gallimard: Paris, 2004.
• Schapp, Andrew. “Political Reconciliation through the Struggle for Recognition.” Social and Legal Studies 13, no. 4 (2004): 523-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663904047332.
• Skinner, Quentin. “A Third Concept of Liberty.” Proceedings of the British Academy 117 (2002): 237-268. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197262795.003.0007.
• Skinner, Quentin. “Modernity and Disenchantment: Some Historical Reflections.” In Philosophy in An Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. Edited by James Tully. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621970.005.
• Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
• Taylor, Charles. “Ethics and Ontology.” Journal of Philosophy 100, no. 6 (June 2003): 305-320. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2003100611.
• Taylor, Charles. “Explanation and Practical Reason.” In Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
• Taylor, Charles. Hegel. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1975.
• Taylor, Charles. Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173483.
• Taylor, Charles. L’Age Seculier. Translated by Patrick Savidan. Boréal: Montréal, 2011.
• Taylor, Charles. “Lichtung and Lebensform: Parallels between Heidegger and Wittgenstein.” In Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
• Taylor, Charles. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385806.
• Taylor, Charles. Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition, edited by Alan Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.
• Taylor, Charles. “Overcoming Epistemology.” In Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Taylor, Charles. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
• Taylor, Charles. Philosophy and Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173490.
• Taylor, Charles. Raprocher les solitudes: Ecrits sur le fédéralisme et le nationalisme au Canada. Sainte-Foy- Tarentaise: Les presses de l’université Laval, 1992.
• Taylor, Charles. “Reply and Re-articulation.” Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism. Ed. James Tully (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 24.
• Taylor, Charles. Sources of Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
• Taylor, Charles. The Explanation of Behavior. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.
• Taylor, Charles. “The Importance of Herder.” In Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
• Taylor, Charles. The Malaise of Modernity. Toronto: Anansi, 1991.
• Taylor, Charles. The Pattern of Politics. Toronto: McLellan and Stewart, 1970.
• Taylor, Charles. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
• Taylor, Charles. “What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty.” In The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honor of Isaiah Berlin, edited by Alan Ryan, 211-229. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
• Taylor, Charles. “Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere. Edited by Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan Vanantwerpen, 34-59. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
• Tully, James, ed. Philosophy in An Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621970.
• Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
• Williams, Bernard. In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Edited by Geoffrey Hawthorn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Elizabeth Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959.
• Yong, Huang. “Charles Taylor’s Transcendental Arguments for Liberal Communitarianism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 24, no. 4 (July 1998): 76-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379802400405.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0032