Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2017 | 3 (70) | 33-46

Article title

ICT goes university. Three ideas and their implementations

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article looks at three pedagogical solutions - blended tutoring, online intercultural exchanges and the flipped classroom - which capitalize on the symbiosis between pedagogy and new technologies. Each of the three proposals stems from a belief that university education should be dialogic and result in meaning construction rather than content transmission. There is a common scheme in which all three solutions are presented here. First, each proposal is accommodated with a certain theoretical outline. Then the pedagogical routines employed during its implementation are discussed. Each presentation cycle is closed with a description and analysis of a case study: the interaction between a tutor and a tutee in the case of blended tutoring; the course of a 2014 German-Polish telecollaboration for Online Intercultural Exchanges; and finally, the different aspects of a merger between the flipped university and the Design Thinking model.

Keywords

Journal

Year

Issue

Pages

33-46

Physical description

Dates

published
2017

Contributors

author

References

  • Barseghian, T. (2011, May 26). Iterating and ideating: Teachers think like designers. Mind/Shift. Retrieved from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2011/05/26/what-happens-when-teachers-think-like-designers/.
  • Bashan, B., & Hosblat, R. (2012). Co-teaching through modeling processes: Professional development of students and instructors in a teacher training program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(2), 207-226.
  • Beck, R.J. (2007). The Oxford tutorial system: A learning theory. Oxford Magazine, 8th week, Trinity term, 13-17.
  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Cramp, A. (2011). Developing first-year engagement with written feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402484
  • Garrison, D.R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  • Harris, J.B., Freeman, T.L., & Aerni, P.W. (2009). On becoming educational researchers: The importance of cogenerative mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260802658546
  • IDEO LCC. (2012). Design thinking for educators toolkit. Retrieved from https://designthinkingforeducators.com/design-thinking/.
  • Johnson, B.A., & Harreld, D.J. (2012). Nurturing independent learning in the undergraduate student in H=history: A faculty-student mentoring experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(3), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.701962
  • Koria, M., Graff, D., & Karjalainen, T.M. (2011). Learning design thinking: International design business management at Aalto University. REDIGE Review on Design Innovation and Strategic Management, 2(1), 1-21. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mikko_Koria/publication/301279472_Learning_Design_Thinking_International_Design_Business_Management_at_Aalto_University/links/570eace108aee76b9dadf8c8.pdf.
  • Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2017). Task design for telecollaborative exchanges: In search of new criteria. System, 64, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.004
  • Kurek, M., & Turula, A. (2013). Praca zespołowa online: uwarunkowania kulturowe i edukacyjne - próba analizy. In J. Stańczyk & E. Nowinkiewicz (Eds.), Dydaktyka językowa a kompetencje ogólne (pp. 247-259). Bydgoszcz: NKJO.
  • Laakso, M., & Clavert, M. (2014). Promoting creativity and design thinking skills among university students. Finland: Aalto University Design Factory. 14 p. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/11651545/Promoting_creativity_and_design_thinking_skills_among_University_students.
  • Matthews, J.H., & Wrigley, C. (2011). Design and design thinking in business and management education and development. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 41-54. Retrieved from http://www.anzamconference.org/.
  • Moore, W.G. (1968). The tutorial system and its tuture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • O'Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902778369
  • O'Dowd, R. (2011). Intercultural communicative competence through telecollaboration. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication (342-358). London: Routledge.
  • Palfreyman, D. (2002). The Oxford tutorial. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2011). Personal learning networks: Using the power of connections to transform education. Solution Tree Press.
  • Rose, C. (2014). Co to jest odwrócona lekcja? I dlaczego powinno Cię to zainteresować - nawet przed wprowadzeniem Cyfrowej Szkoły? Retrieved August 10, 2017 from http://edukacjaidialog.pl/blog/wpis,co_to_jest_odwrocona_lekcja_i_dlaczego_powinno_cie_to_zainteresowac_-_nawet_przed_wprowadzeniem_cyfrowej_szkoly,1453.html.
  • Thompson, C. (2013). Smarter than you think: How technology is changing our minds for the better. New York: Penguin.
  • Turula, A. (2014). Kiedy dydaktyka akademicka jest nowoczesna: o potrzebie dywersyfikacji kształcenia na odległość. Kultura i Polityka, 16, 45-63.
  • Turula, A. (2016). Between new technologies and new paradigms in academic education: A non-reductionist approach. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 2(2), 47-60.
  • Turula, A. (2017). The shallows and the depths. Cognitive and social presence in blended tutoring. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(5), 1-18.
  • Turula, A. (forthcoming). Hybrydowy tutoring akademicki. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UP.
  • VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
  • Vaughan, N.D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D.R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-708dff63-8938-4ac7-bd35-6baedb44812e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.