PL EN


2012 | 16 | 233-248
Article title

The applications of airborne laser scanning in archaeology

Authors
Selected contents from this journal
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) is a new tool that has been changing aerial archaeology since the late 1990s. By using a georeferenced laser beam, it can survey through tree canopies. This ability allows researchers to track anthropogenic remains in woodland and jungle environments. The device has great potential in archaeology as vast areas of our planet are covered with trees. A systematic survey may uncover new archaeological sites and determine the full geographical extent of partially known features. The LiDAR system is based on a device measuring distance between the aircraft and the ground. Due to the high density nature of the laser beams used, there is a significant chance that some of them penetrate through canopies and reflect off the ground. The second step in this process is to differentiate of points that are reflected off of tree trunks and ground to make a digital elevation model (DEM) of the bare surface. The presentation of results has also been problematic in the past because the human brain is unable to perceive DEMs. To solve this problem, there are many alternative methods of display such as hill-shade imaging and three-dimensional modeling. Through this process, one is able to find traces of past human activity. Important case studies in Europe and North America will be mentioned.
Year
Volume
16
Pages
233-248
Physical description
Contributors
author
References
  • Banic J. R. and Cunningham A. G. 1998. Airborne laser bathymetry:a tool for the next millennium. Economic Exclusive Zone Technology 3,Aug/Sep, 75-80.
  • Boyd D. S. and Hill R. A. 2007. Validation of airborne LiDAR intensityvalues from a forested landscape using HYMAP data: preliminaryanalyses. International Society for Photogrammetry and RemoteSensing 26, Part 3/W52, 71-76.
  • Branton N. 2009. Landscape approaches in historical archaeology:the archaeology of places. In T. Majewski and D. Gaimster (eds),International Handbook of Historical Archaeology, 65-71. New York.
  • Chase A., Chase D., Weishampel J., Drake J., Shrestha R., Slatton K.,Awe J. and Carter W. 2011. Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, andthe ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. JAS 38 (2011),387-398.
  • Chase A., Chase D. and Weinshampel J. 2010. Lasers in the jungle.Archaeology 63/4, July/August, 27-30.
  • Chase A. and Chase D. 1987. Investigations at the Classic Maya Cityof Caracol, Belize: 1985-1987. San Francisco.
  • Coe M. D. 1966. The Maya. London.
  • Crow P. 2008. Historic Environment Surveys of Woodland using LiDAR.Stockport.
  • Crutchley S. 2008. Ancient and modern: combining different remotesensing techniques to interpret historic landscapes. In R. Lasaponaraand N. Masini N. (eds), Advances on Remote Sensing for Archaeologyand Cultural Heritage Management. Proceedings of the 1stInternational EARSeL Workshop CNR, Rome, September 30--October 4, 2008, 65-71. Rome.
  • Crutchley S. and Crow P. 2010. The Light Fantastic. Using Air BorneLiDAR in Archaeological Survey. Swindon.
  • Doneus M. and Briese C. 2006a. Digital terrain modelling forarchaeological interpretation within forested areas using full-waveformlaserscanning. In M. Ioannides, D. Arnold, F. Niccolucci and K. Mania(eds), The 7th International Symposium on Virtual Reality,Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST (2006), 155-162. Nicosia.
  • Doneus M. and Briese C. 2006b. Full-waveform airborne laser scanningas a tool for archaeological reconnaissance. In S. Campana andM. Forte (eds), “From Space to place” Proceedings of the 2nd246 K. HanusInternational Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology, 99-105(BAR-IS 1568). Oxford.
  • Doneus M. and Briese C. 2010. Airborne Laser Scanning in forested areas– potential and limitations of an archaeological prospection technique.In D. C. Cowley (ed.), EAC Occasional Paper 5. OccasionalPublication of the Aerial Archaeology Research Group 3. RemoteSensing for Archaeological Heritage Management, 59-76. Brussels.
  • Garrison T., Houston S., Golden C, Inomata T., Nelson Z. and Munson J.2008. Evaluating the use of IKONOS satellite imagery in lowlandMaya settlement archaeology. JAS 35 (2008), 2770-2777.
  • Gutierrez R., Gibeaut J., Smyth R., Hepner T. and Andrews J. 2001.Precise airborne LiDAR surveying for coastal research and Geohazardsapplications. International Archives of Photogrammetry and RemoteSensing 34/3, 185-192.
  • Fletcher R., Evans D., Barbetti M., Penny D., Than H., Sokrithy I.,Chan K., Somaneath T. and Pottier C. 2003. Redefining Angkor:Structure and environment in the largest low density urban complexof the preindustrial world. Udaya: Journal of Khmer Studies 4,107-125.
  • Loisios D., Tzelepis N. and Nakos B. 2007. A methodology for creatinganalytical hill-shading by combining different lighting directions.In Proceedings of 23th International Cartographic Conference,Moscow, 4-10 August 2007. Moscow.
  • Oswald A., Smith L. and Handley C. 2008. Introduction to surveysand surveying techniques. In I. D. Rotheram, M. Jones, L. Smith andC. Handley (eds), Woodland Heritage Manual – A Guide toInvestingating Woodland Landscapes, 86-95. Sheffield.
  • McKee Ba. and Sever T. 1994. Remote Sensing in the Arenal Region.In P. Sheets and B. McKee (eds), Archaeology, Volcanism, and RemoteSensing in the Arenal Region, Costa Rica, 135-142. Austin.
  • Parcak S. H. 2009. Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology. Abingdon-on-Thames.
  • Pfeifer N. and Briesea C. 2007. Geometrical aspects of Airborne LaserScanning and Terrestrial Laser Scanning. International Society forPhotogramethry and Remote Sensing 26, Part 3/W52, 113-119.
  • Podobnikar T. 2009. Methods for visual quality assessment of a digitalterrain model. S.A.P.I.E.N.S. Online. Retrieved from http://sapiens.revues.org/738 (status as of 20 April 2012).The applications of airborne laser scanning in archaeology 247
  • Rączkowski W. 2002. Archeologia lotnicza, metoda wobec teorii. Poznań.
  • Renfrew C. and Bahn P. 2002. Archeologia. Teorie, metody, praktyka,transl. M. Kasprzycka, K. Lewartowski, R. Oracz, D. Stabrowskaand F. Stępniowski. Warsaw.
  • Romain W. and Burks J. 2008a. LiDAR assessment of the Newarkearthworks. Current Research in Ohio Archaeology 2008. Retrievedfrom http://www.ohioarchaeology.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=232&Itemid=32 (status as of 22 April 2012).
  • Romain W. and Burks J. 2008b. LiDAR analyses of Prehistoricearthworks in Ross County, Ohio. Current Research in OhioArchaeology 2008. Retrieved from http://www.ohioarchaeology.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=233&Itemid=32 (status as of 22 April 2012).
  • Symonds M. 2011. Holding the line. WorldArch 44, 26-31.
  • Wehr A. and Lohr U. 1999. Airborne laser scanning – an introductionand overview. International Society for Photogrammetry and RemoteSensing. Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 54, 68-82.
  • Wilson D. R. 2000. Air Photo Interpretation for Archaeologists.Brimscombe.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-7120da68-8708-4807-b505-fa9db5216f76
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.