Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2017 | 4(2017) | 45–61

Article title

Wpływ kształcenia pozaformalnego na płace osób z wykształceniem wyższym

Authors

Title variants

EN
The impact of non-formal education on the wages of people with higher education

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja premii płacowej z udziału w szkoleniach zawodowych pracowników mających wykształcenie wyższe. Wykorzystano dane jednostkowe z Badania aktywności ekonomicznej ludności (BAEL) z okresu 2001–2013. W celu redukcji obciążenia estymatora premii płacowej zastosowano porównawczo dwie metody: DID oraz DID-PSM. Stwierdzono, że szkolenia przeciętnie nie mają wpływu na zarobki osób z wykształceniem wyższym. Niewielką pozytywną premię płacową uzyskali jednak uczestnicy szkoleń długich (ponad 20-godzinnych) oraz prowadzonych w formie warsztatowej, a więc takich, które potencjalnie powinny dostarczać najwięcej umiejętności.
EN
The purpose of this paper was to identify the wage premium from participation in the vocational training of employees with tertiary education. Individual data from the Polish Labour Force Survey were used for the period of 2001–2013. In order to reduce the bias of the wage premium estimator, two methods were used for comparative purposes: DID and DID-PSM. It was found that training, on average, has no impact on the earnings of individuals with tertiary education. However, a modest positive wage premium was obtained by the participants of extended training (over 20 hours) and workshops. In fact, these are the types of training that are expected to improve skills to the largest extent.

Journal

Year

Issue

Pages

45–61

Physical description

Contributors

  • Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (1997). Training and innovation in an imperfect labor market. Review of Economic Studies, 64(3), 445–464.
  • Albert, C., García-Serrano, C. i Hernanz, V. (2010). On-the-job training in Europe: determinants and wage returns. International Labour Review, 149(3), 315–341.
  • Barron, J. M., Berger, M. C. i Black, D. A. (1999). Do workers pay for on-the-job training? Journal of Human Resources, 34(2), 235–252.
  • Barron, J. M., Black, D. A. i Loewenstein, M. A. (1989). Job matching and on-the-job training. Journal of Labour Economics, 7(1), 1–19.
  • Bartel, A. (1995). Training, wage growth, and job performance: evidence from a company database. Journal of Labor Economics, 13(3), 401–425.
  • Becker, G. (1962). Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.
  • Berger, M., Earle, J. i Sabirianova, K. (2001). Worker training in a restructuring economy: evidence from the Russian transition. W: S. Polachek (red.), Worker wellbeing in a changing labor market (t. 20, Research in labor economics, s. 159–190). Bringley: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Bishop, J. (1996). What we know about employer-provided training: a review of literature. [Working Paper Nr 96–09.] Ithaca: Center of Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University.
  • Blundell, R., Dearden, L. i Meghir, C. (1996). The determinants and effects of work-related training in Britain. London: The Institute for Fiscal Studied.
  • Booth, A. (1993). Private sector training and graduate earnings. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75(1), 164–170.
  • Brown, J. (1989). Why do wages increase with tenure? On-the-job training and life-cycle wage growth observed within firms. American Economic Review, 79(5), 971–991.
  • Brunello, G., Comi, S. i Sonedda, D. (2012). Training subsidies and the wage returns to vocational training: evidence from Italian regions. Labour Economics, 19(3), 361–372.
  • Budria, S. i Pereira, P. T. (2007). The wage effects of training in Portugal: differences across skill groups, genders, sectors and training types. Applied Economics, 39(6), 787–807.
  • Carmichael, H. L. (1983). Firm specific capital and promotion ladders. Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1), 251–258.
  • Görlitz, K. (2011). Continuous training and wages: an empirical analysis using a comparison group approach. Economics of Education Review, 30(4), 691–701.
  • Görlitz, K. i Tamm, M. (2016). The returns to voucher-financed training on wages, employment and job tasks. Economics of Education Review, 52, 51–62.
  • Goux, D. i Maurin, E. (2000). Returns to firm-provided training: evidence from French worker-firm matched data. Labor Economics, 7(1), 1–19.
  • Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. i Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.
  • Hidalgo, D., Oosterbeek, H. i Webbink, D. (2014). The impact of training vouchers on low-skilled workers. Labour Economics, 31(C), 117–128 .
  • Kuckulenz, A. i Zwick, T. (2003). The impact on earnings – differences between participant groups and training forms. [ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03–57.] Pobrano z ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0357.pdf
  • Lengermann, P. (1999). How long do the benefits of training last? Evidence of long term effects across current and previous employers. Research in Labor Economics, 18, 439–461.
  • Leuven, E. i Oosterbeek, H. (2008). An alternative approach to estimate the wage returns to private-sector training. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(4), 423–434.
  • Leuven, E. i Sianesi, B. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Pobrano z http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
  • Leuven, E., Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. i Klaveren, C. van (2002). Worker reciprocity and employer investment in training. [Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 02-090/3.] Amsterdam–Rotterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
  • Liwiński, J. (2015). Efektywność zatrudnieniowa szkolenia osób bezrobotnych w Polsce. Edukacja, 135(4), 147–165.
  • Loewenstein, M. i Spletzer, J. (1996). Belated training: the relationship between training, tenure and wages. [Working Paper No. 296.] Washington: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • Loewenstein, M. i Spletzer, J. (1999a). General and specific training: evidence and implications. Journal of Human Resources, 34(4), 710–733.
  • Loewenstein, M. i Spletzer, J. (1999b). Formal and informal training: evidence from the NLSY. Research in Labor Economics, 18, 403–438.
  • Lynch, L. (1992). Private sector training and the earnings of young workers. American Economic Review, 82(1), 299–312.
  • Muehler, G., Beckmann, M. i Schauenberg, B. (2007). The returns to continuous training in Germany: new evidence from propensity score matching estimators. Review of Managerial Science, 3(1), 209–235.
  • Parent, D. (1999). Wages and mobility: the impact of employer-provided training. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2), 298–317.
  • Pischke, J., (2001). Continuous training in Germany. Journal of Population Economics, 14(3), 523–548.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R. i Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
  • Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3–4), 169–188.
  • Schwerdt, G., Messer, D., Woessmann, L. i Wolter, S. C. (2012). The impact of an adult education voucher program: evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 96(7–8), 569–583.
  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signalling, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
  • Travkin, P. i Sharunina A. (2016). The returns to training in Russia: a difference-in-differences analysis. International Journal of Training and Development, 20(4), 262-278.
  • Turek, K. i Worek, B. (2015). Kształcenie po szkole. Edukacja a rynek pracy (t. III). Warszawa: Państwowa Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.
  • Wroniewicz, M. i Strawiński, P. (2013). Badanie zwrotu z mobilności zawodowej w Polsce. Ekonomia, 35, 111–135.

Notes

http://www.edukacja.ibe.edu.pl/images/numery/2017/4-4-liwinski-wplyw-wyksztalcenia-pozaformalnego.pdf

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-722589c8-e6e9-426b-88ca-5eb5f96c795c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.