Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl



2018 | 5 (77) | 44-52

Article title

Developing a Reflective Practitioner through Telecollaboration in Language Teacher Preservice Education - A Bottom-up Perspective


Title variants

Languages of publication



The paper presents the results of a telecollaborative project between BA students of the University of Warsaw and students of the University of Valladolid within the framework of the European Erasmus+ EVALUATE project. The aim of that project is to justify the effectiveness of telecollaborative activities for professional development of future language teachers. The experience confirms that initial intercultural competence is essential for undertaking such a project. It also validates the need for blending professional preparation of language teachers so that they realize that the teaching methods and pedagogical approaches which are introduced in their pre-service courses are very similar or even the same irrespectively where they get their qualifications. Such blended learning activities are complementary to national teacher training programs and to Erasmus+ students exchange projects.






Physical description


  • University of Warsaw
  • University of Valladolid


  • Allen, L.Q. (2004). Implementing a culture portfolio project within a constructivist paradigm. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 232-239.
  • Belz, J.A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning&Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved from http://www.lltjournal.org/item/2373.
  • Bortoluzzi, M., Mullen, A. (2018). Teacher reflection and development in an intercultural telecollaborative project. Presentation at EuroCALL Conference Future-proof CALL: Language learning as exploration and encounters, 23-25 August 2018, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit.
  • Dewey, J. (1974). John Dewey on Education: Selected Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1933/1997). How we think. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
  • Dooley, M. (2010). Teacher 2.0. In S. Gut, F. Helm (Eds.). Telecollaboration 2.0. Language Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st century (pp. 227-304). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Dooley, M., O'Dowd, R. (Eds.). (2018). In This Together Teachers' Experiences with Transnational, Telecollaborative Language Learning Projects. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Fragoulis, I., Tsiplakides, I. (2009). Project-Based Learning in the Teaching of English as A Foreign Language in Greek Primary Schools: From Theory to Practice. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 113-119.
  • Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a voice to the silent language of culture: The Cultura Project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55-102. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg/default.html.
  • Gajek, E., Poszytek, P. (Eds.). (2009). eTwinning drogą do edukacji przyszłości. Warszawa: Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji.
  • Gajek, E. (2010). Social and cognitive constructivism in practice on the basis of eTwinning project in science. In Z.C. Zacharia, C.P. Constantinou, M. Papaevipidou (Eds.). Computer Based Learning in Science (pp. 41-47). Cyprus: University of Cyprus.
  • Gajek, E. (2016). Komplementarność cyfrowego i tradycyjnego uczenia się i nauczania języków obcych. Roczniki Kulturoznawcze, 6(4), 123-140. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2013.793689.
  • Gajek, E. (2012). Constructionism in action. European eTwinning Projects. In F. Zhang (Ed.). Computer-Enhanced and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Emerging Issues and Trends (pp. 116-136). Australia: IGI-Global.
  • Gajek, E. (2017). Curriculum integration in distance learning at primary and secondary educational levels on the example of eTwinning projects. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1-15.
  • Gibbes, M., Carson, L. (2014). Project-based language learning: an activity theory analysis, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 171-189. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17501229.2013.793689
  • Guerin, E.M.C., Cigognini, M.E., Pettenati, M.C. (2010). Learner 2.0. In S. Gut, F. Helm (Eds.). Telecollaboration 2.0 Language Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st century (pp. 199-218). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Gut, S., Helm, F. (Eds.) (2010). Telecollaboration 2.0 Language Literacies and Intercultural Learning in the 21st century. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Kincheloe, J. K. (2008). Critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods macrostrategies for language teaching, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Larrivee, B. (2008). Meeting the challenge of preparing reflective practitioners. The New Educator, 4(2), 87-106.
  • Mont, M., Masats, D. (2018). Tips and suggestions to implement telecollaborative projects with young learners. In M. Dooley, R. O'Dowd (Eds.). In This Together Teachers' Experiences with Transnational, Telecollaborative Language Learning Projects (pp. 94-122). Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Müller-Hartmann, A. (2007). Teacher Role in Telecollaboration Setting up and Managing Exchanges. In R. O'Dowd (Ed.). Online Intercultural exchange: A Introduction for Foreign Language Teachers (pp. 128-167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • O'Dowd, R. (2005). Negotiating Sociocultural and Institutional texts: The case of Spanish-American Telecollaboration. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 40-57.
  • O'Dowd, R. & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2018). A Training Manual on Telecollaboration for Teacher trainers. Leon: University of Leon.
  • O'Dowd, R., Lewis, T. (Eds.). (2016). Online Intercultural Exchange: policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge Studies in Language and Intercultural Communication. London: Routledge.
  • O'Dowd, R., Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer assisted language learning, 22(2), 173-188.
  • Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, M. Northcote (Eds.). Quality conversations: Proceedings of the 25th HERDSA Annual Conference (pp. 562-567). Jamison, Australian Capital Territory: HERDSA.
  • The Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Framework for 21st century learning. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
  • Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, Oxford: Jossey Bass Publishers.
  • Stoller, F. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In G.H. Beckett, P.C. Miller (Eds.). Project-Based Second and Foreign Language education: past, present, and future (pp. 19-40). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.