PL EN


Journal
2009 | 22 | 116-123
Article title

The role of Clinical Ethics Committees

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Over the past 15 years or so, Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) have been established in many healthcare settings in the UK. How do they work, who sits on them, and what do they discuss? How formal should they be? Should their decisions be binding on clinicians, or purely advisory? Should they offer their services to patients and their families too? Are they valuable additions to clinical support, or simply intellectual talking-shops for their members? Should other countries set up CECs as part of their own approach to Clinical Ethics?
Keywords
Journal
Year
Issue
22
Pages
116-123
Physical description
Contributors
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital, London
References
  • Draper et al. [2006-2007] – H. Draper, A. MacDiarmaid-Gordon, L. Strumidlo, B. Teuten, E. Updale, Virtual ethics committee, “Clin Ethics” (1, 2, 3, all issues) 2006-2007.
  • Sokol [2009] – D.K. Sokol, The unpalatable truth about ethics committees, “BMJ” 339, 2009: b4179.
  • Updale [2006] – E. Updale, The challenge of lay membership of clinical ethics committees, “Clin Ethics” (60-62) 2006: 1 (1).
  • Updale [2008] – E. Updale, The ethics of the everyday: problems the professors are too posh to ponder?, “Clin Ethics” (34-36) 2008: 3 (1).
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-73e3ab83-e936-4870-a1cb-214ee8866cc1
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.