The Path to Mary’s Acquittal: Legal Solutions in the N-Town Cycle’s “Trial of Mary and Joseph”

• Authors: Wiącek Tomasz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the ‘‘Trial of Mary and Joseph”, a play from the late fifteenth-century N-Town cycle, Mary and Joseph are tried for adultery and breaking a public oath. The trial is the result of an indictment brought about by the public rumour concerning the origins of Mary’s pregnancy and possibility that Joseph is not the father of the child. The setting of a contemporary fifteenth-century ecclesiastical court introduces a legal and procedural approach which cannot properly process such an extraordinary event as the miraculous origins of Mary’s pregnancy. As a result, Mary cannot be acquitted in accordance to the fifteenth-century regulations and a legal modification in the procedure must be implemented. However, a direct change would have a negative effect on the credibility of the play and the legal system it represents. Therefore, a subtle alteration is introduced: a transition from a strictly rational and commonsensical ecclesiastical ex officio trial to the common law trial by jury as outlined in the Assize of Clarendon, which legally utilized ordeal as a form of purgation. As a result, Mary could be legally acquitted, and the system’s credibility would not have suffered from an intentional and highly irregular alteration, while the audience of the play would have been assured that a medieval legal system could deal with cases even as extraordinary as a miraculous virgin birth. The argument will unfold through a detailed comparative study of both procedures, their similarities and disparities, presented in the context of the social and legal perceptions of a contemporary audience.

Keywords

EN

N-Town cycle; drama; Mary’s miracle; medieval legal system

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2013
• Issue: 22/1
• Pages: 83-96

Contributors

author

Wiącek Tomasz

• University of Warsaw

References

• Spector, Stephen. (ed.). 1991. The N-Town Play: Cotton MS VespasianD. 8. 2 Vols., EETS, s.s. 11–12, Oxford: Oxford University Press. The Holy Bible, King James Version.
• Spector, Stephen. (ed.). 2008. New York: Oxford Edition: 1769; King James Bible Online, 2008. http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/.
• Brundage, James A. 1987. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Brundage, James A. 2008. The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Clopper, Lawrence. 1999. “English drama: from ungodly ludi to sacred play.” The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature. Ed. David Wallace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (739–766)
• Firth Green, Richard. 1999. “Medieval literature and law.” The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature. Ed. by David Wallace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (407–431)
• Hayes, Douglas W. 2000. “Backbiter and the Rhetoric of Detraction.” Comparative Drama, Volume 34, Number 1: 53–78.
• Helmholz, R. H. 1971. “Canonical Defamation in Medieval England”. The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 15, No. 4: 255–268.
• Helmholz, R. H. 1974. Marriage Litigation in Medieval England. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Helmholz, R. H. [1983a]. “Crime, Compurgation and the Courts of the Medieval Church” Law and History Review, Vol. 1, No. 1: 1–26.
• Helmholz, R. H. [1983b]. ‘‘The Early History of the Grand Jury and the Canon Law” The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, Fiftieth Anniversary Issue: 613–627.
• Janin, Hunt. 2004. Medieval Justice. Cases and Laws in France, England and Germany, 500–1500. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, Inc.
• Lea, Henry C. 1996. Superstition and Force: Torture, Ordeal, and Trial by Combat in Medieval Law. New York: Barnes & Noble.
• Lipton, Emma. 2002. “Language on Trial: Performing the Law in the N-Town Trial Play”. In The Letter of the Law. Legal Practice and Literary Production in Medieval England, Ed. by Emily Steiner and Candace Barrington. New York: Cornell University Press: 115–135.
• McSheffrey, Shannon. 1995. Love and Marriage in Late Medieval London. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.
• McSheffrey, Shannon. 2006. Marriage, Sex, and Civic Culture in Late Medieval London. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Musson, Anthony. 2001. Medieval Law in Context: The Growth of Legal Consciousness from Magna Carta to The Peasants’ Revolt. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
• Pedersen, Frederik. 2000. Marriage Disputes in Medieval England. London: Hambledon Press.
• Poos, L. R. 1995. “Sex, Lies, and the Church Courts of Pre-Reformation England.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 25, No. 4: 585–607.