PL EN


2015 | 28 | 39-49
Article title

Human Rights in China and the Philosophical Perspective

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
In today’s socio-political reality, human rights take an important place as part of the debate on the relationship between the citizen and the state. Against this background, we can distinguish those states which do not belong to the circle of Western culture, including China. The author raises the question of a presence of human rights in China, treating it as a philosophical issue. He points to the need for taking on a perspective of economic development as an opportunity to improve the situation of the individual. The author considers the possibility of an implementation of a new political model and indicates the threats to human rights in China.
Year
Issue
28
Pages
39-49
Physical description
Dates
published
2015-12-01
Contributors
  • Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw
References
  • Human rights are a qualified form of rights and freedoms of the individual, projected to protect their interests, attributable to each human person, regardless of nationality and of any differentiating characteristics (Wiesław Skrzydło (ed.), Polskie prawo konstytucyjne [Polish constitutional law], Lublin: Verba, 2003, p. 154). This definition would suggest objective and intercultural nature of human rights, which, however, does not apply outside a circle of the Western civilization the West. In addition, Wiktor Osiatyński states: human rights are Universal, moral laws of a fundamental nature, associated with each individual in their dealings with a state. The concept of human rights is based on three arguments: first, that every authority is limited, and second, that each person has a sphere of autonomy, to which no power has access; and thirdly, that each individual can claim a state to protect their rights (Wiktor Osiatyński, Szkoła Praw Człowieka. Teksty wykładów [School of Human Rights. The texts of lectures], vol. 1, Warsaw: Helsińska Fundacja Praw Człowieka, 1998, p.16). This statement accentuates a limitation of the state’s power as a source of human rights. Katarzyna Koszewska emphasizes the contextual nature of human rights, describing them as basic, universal and inherent rights of the human being in their relations with the public authorities (Katarzyna Koszewska (ed.), Prawa człowieka – poradnik nauczyciela [Human rights – teacher’s guide], Warszawa: Centralny Ośrodek Doskonalenia Nauczycieli, 2002, p. 11.
  • Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. 8, Human Rights and the Indyvidual in International Law. International Economic Relations, Amsterdam – New York – Oxford: North Holland Publishing Company,
  • 1985, p. 268.
  • Heinrich Rickert, Die probleme der Geschichtsphilosophie, Heidelberg: Winter, 1924, p. 90.
  • Carl Wellman, An approach to Rights: Studies In the Philosophy of Laws and Morals, Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 1997, p. 81.
  • Bonnie Kent, Virtues of the will: the transformation of ethics in the late thirteenth century, Michigan: Catholic University of America Press, 1995, p. 41.
  • Adam Wielomski, Konserwatyzm – między Atenami a Jerozolimą [Conservatism – between Athens and Jerusalem], Warsaw: Fijor Publishing Company, 2009, p. 13.
  • Idem, Filozofia polityczna francuskiego tradycjonalizmu 1796 – 1830 [Political philosophy of the French traditionalism 1796 – 1830], Warsaw: Capital, 2013, p. 18.
  • Pierre Jurieu, Les soupirs de la France esclave, qui aspire après la liberté [Sighs of France slave who longs for liberty] ,1689, John Locke, Dwa traktaty o rządzie [Two Treatises of Government], II, p. 136.
  • H. Arendt, Korzenie totalitaryzmu [The Origins of Totalitarianism], Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, 2008, pp. 233 – 235, 241.
  • Thomas Molnar, L’ Utopie. Eternelle Hérésie [Utopia. Eternal heresy], Paris: Beauchesne, 1973, p. 249.
  • Katechizm Kościoła Katolickiego [Catechism of the Catholic Church], Warsaw: Pallottinum, 1994, paragraphs 2270, 2274.
  • Tomasz Białowąs, Magdalena Kąkol, „Stosunki handlowe Unii Europejskiej z Chinami w latach 1995-2007” [Trade relations between the European Union and China], in: Pozycja Unii Europejskiej w handlu międzynarodowym [Position of the European Union in the international trade], Bogumiła Mucha-Leszko (ed.), Lublin: UMSC, 2009, p. 139.
  • Tomasz Kamieński, „Miejsce Chin w polityce bezpieczeństwa Unii Europejskiej” [China's place in the security policy of the European Union], Azja – Pacyfik, No. 9, 2006, 31.
  • Xinning Song, EU-China Strategic Partnership: Domestic and International Perspectives, materials from a conference International Politics of EU-China Relations, organized in London on 20–21.04.2006 by British Academy and Chinese Academy of Social Science.
  • Katarzyna Hołdak, Anna Konarzewska, „Stosunki Unii Europejskiej z Chinami” [Relations between the European Union and China], Bezpieczeństwo Narodowe, No. 5-6, III-IV 2007, 279 – 280.
  • Tadeusz Sporek, „Analiza stosunków handlowych pomiędzy Chińską Republiką Ludową a Unią Europejską” [Analysis of trade relations between the People’s Republic of China and the European Union], Studia ekonomiczne, No. 123, 2012, 28, 34 – 35.
  • Zbigniew Rau, „Wstęp” [Introduction], Dwa traktaty o rządzie [Two treatises of Government], John Locke, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1992, p. 46.
  • Antoni Podsiad (ed.), Mały słownik terminów i pojęć filozoficznych dla studiujących filozofię chrześcijańską [Little dictionary of terms and concepts for students of Christian philosophy], Warsaw: PAX, 1983, pp. 426 – 427.
  • Retrieved from: http://www.esquire.com/features/china0807 [18 XI 2014].
  • Jean-François Dufour, Géopolitique de la Chine [Geopolitics of China], Paris: Complexe, 1999, p. 31.
  • Retrieved from: http://www.kapitalizm.republika.pl/chiny.html [18 XI 2014].
  • Podsiad, Mały słownik terminów…. p. 427.
  • Cicero, De virtutibus [On virtues], p. 7.
  • Richard Pipes, Rewolucja rosyjska [Russian revolution], Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1994, p. 535
  • Cicero, De inventione [On invention] II, p. 160.
  • Retrieved from: http://krakowskie.nazwa.pl/test/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=177:antoni-szymaski-qetatyzm-i-wolno-gospodarczaq&catid=6:klasycy-o-wolnym-rynku-i-roli-pastwa-w-gospodarce&Itemid=7 [21 XI 2014]
  • Retrieved from: http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking [21 XI 2014].
  • James Gwartney, Robert Lawson, Joshua Hall, Economic freedom of the World: 2013 Annual Report, Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2013, p. 2.
  • Jean C. Oi, State and Peasant in Contemporary China: The Political Economy of Village Government, Berkeley – Los Angeles – Oxford: University of California Press, 1991, p. 102.
  • Retrieved from: http://www.chinskiraport.pl/blog/handel-z-chinami-korupcja-w-chinach/ [21 XI 2014].
  • Pierre Bourdieu, The Logic of Practice, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.
  • Tom Palmer (ed.), Why liberty? Your life. Your choices. Your future, Ottawa, Illinois: Jameson Books, Inc, 2013.
  • The relationships between the economy and axiological categories were described in: Idem, After the welfare state, Ottawa, Illinois: Jameson Books, Inc, 2012.
  • Andrzej Kojder, „Korupcja i poczucie moralne Polaków” [Corruption and the Poles’ sense of moral], in: Kondycja moralna społeczeństwa polskiego, Janusz Mariański [ed.], Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM, PolskaAkademia Nauk – Komitet Socjologii 2002, p. 249.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-76e787f0-82d7-49d2-8e07-91e89e02da23
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.