PL EN


2015 | 15 | 4 | 60-75
Article title

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING IN THE FACEBOOK CONTEXT

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Social Networking Sites (SNS) such as Facebook (FB) are currently highly used by students because technology has the potential to become a valuable resource to support their educational communications and collaborations. This paper attempts to present a comprehensive picture of what has been investigated in terms of the use of Facebook as an online English language-learning environment and inquires whether this learning model can enhance students’ learning of English. It also aims to explore the students’ perceptions towards learning English in the Facebook context following four treatments, language improvement, confidence, motivation and attitude. The sample who participated in the study was N=65, in the department of English language and translation enrolled in a B.A program. Findings revealed that the EFL students believe that FB as an online learning environment facilitates, supports, and encourages their English language learning. In addition, the findings indicate that students’ motivation and confidence towards English language learning improved via FB. The study also revealed that students had a positive attitude towards this learning model. In light of the findings of the study, it is recommended that TEFL teachers should plan learning classes that use SNS such as Facebook as a learning platform.
Year
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
60-75
Physical description
Contributors
  • Unaizah Community College, Qassim University
References
  • Abu Bakar, N., & Latif, H. (2010). ESL Students feedback on the use of blogs for language learning. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 16(1), 120-141.
  • Akbari, E., Eghtesad, S., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Students' attitudes towards the use of social networks for learning the English language. Retrieved on 28-Sep-2015 from http://conference.pixelonline.net/ICT4LL2012/common/download/Paper_pdf/357-IBT70-FP-Akbari-ICT2012.pdf.
  • Alhomod, S. M., & Shafi, M. M. (2012). Best practices in e-government: A review of some innovative models proposed in different countries. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Sciences, 12(1), 1-6.
  • Bakar, N.A. (2009). E-Learning environment: blogging as a platform for language learning. European Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 594-604.
  • Birch, D., & Volkov, M. (2007). Assessment of online reflections: Engaging English second language (ESL) students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 291-306.
  • Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 6(1), 17−28.
  • Caruso, J. B., & Salaway, G. (2007).The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research, 1-15.
  • Conn, S. R., Roberts, R.L., & Powell, B.M. (2009). Attitudes and satisfaction with a hybrid model of counselling supervision. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 298–306.
  • Eren, Ö. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards using social networking in foreign language classes: A Facebook example. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(20), 288-294.
  • Facebook (2011). Statistics: people on Facebook. https://www.Facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics. Retrieved on July 8, 2011.
  • Fodeman, D., & Monroe, M. (2009). The impact of Facebook on our students. Teacher Librarian, 36(5), 36−40.
  • Haverback, H. R. (2009). Facebook: Uncharted territory in a reading education classroom. Reading Today, 27(2), 34. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/223418449?accountid=30906.
  • Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.
  • Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S.,& Churchward, A. (2007). The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore, 517-525. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2235&context=edupapers.
  • Leutner, D., & J. L. Plass (1998). Measuring learning styles with questionnaires versus direct observation of preferential choice behaviour in authentic learning situations: the visualizer/ verbalizer behavior observation Scale (VV-Bos). Computers in Human Behaviour, 14, 543-557.
  • Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1), 101-114.
  • Lohnes, S., & Kinzer, C. (2007). Questioning assumptions about students’ expectations for technology in college classrooms. Innovate, 3(5), 1-6.
  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: “It is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work”. Learning, Media & Technology, 34(2), 141−155.
  • Mahmud, M. M., & Ching, W. S. (2012). Facebook does it really work for l2 learners. Academic Research, 3, 357-370.
  • McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729-740.
  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007, December). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675). Retrieved from http://www.dlc-ubc.ca/wordpress_dlc_mu/educ500/files/2011/07/mcloughlin.pdf.
  • Mills, N. A. (2009). Facebook and the use of social networking tools to enhance language learner motivation and engagement. Paper presented at the Northeast Association for Language Learning Technology (NEALLT) Conference, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 30–31 October.
  • Moore, K., & Iida, S. (2010). Students' perception of supplementary, online activities for Japanese language learning: Group work, quiz and discussion tools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 966-979.
  • Northcote, M., & Kendle, A. (2001). Informal online networks for learning: Making use of incidental learning through recreation. Paper presented at the International Education Research Conference, December 2–6, Fremantle, Australia. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/4882/.
  • Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.
  • Pinkman, K. (2005). Using Blogs in the foreign language classroom; encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(1), 12-24.
  • Queirolo, J. (2009). Is Facebook as good as face-to-face? Learning & Leading with Technology, 37(4), 8−9.
  • Reinhardt, J., & Zander, V. (2011). Social networking in an intensive English program classroom: A language socialization perspective. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 326-344.
  • Rosen, L. D. (2010). Rewired: Understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. New York: PalgraveMacmillan.
  • Salaway, G., & Caruso, J. B. (2007). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 58-61. 58-61. Research report. Louisville. Retrieved from http://www.csus.edu/irt/cio/strategic planning/Documents/Undergrad-Students-and-IT-2014-Full-Report.pdf.
  • Seitzinger, J. (2006). Be constructive: Blogs, podcasts, and wikis as constructivist learning tools. Learning solutions e-magazine, 1-14. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joyce_Seitzinger/publication/200772664_Be_constructive_Blogs_podcasts_and_wikis_as_constructivist_learning_tools/links/0f31752d5e86b2970d000000.pdf
  • Shih, R. C. (2013). Effect of using Facebook to assist English for business communication course instruction. TOJET, 12(1).52-59 Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008867.
  • Stacey, E. (2002). Learning links online: Establishing constructivist and collaborative learning environments. In Proceedings of the International Education & Technology Conference: Untangling the web-establishing learning links (pp. 1-6). ASET.
  • Tilfarlioglu, F. Y. (2011). An international dimension of the student’s attitudes towards the use of English in web 2.0 technology. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 63-68. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ944929.
  • Wang, Y., & Chen, N. (2007). Online synchronous language learning: SLMS over the Internet. Innovate, 3(3), 1−7. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/104259/.
  • Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. (2010). Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1202-1211.
  • Wu, P. & Hsu, L. H. (2011). EFL learning on social networking site?: An action research on Facebook. Presented at Teaching & Learning with Vision Conference. Queensland, Australia, November 2011. Retrieved February 3, 2012, from http://tlvconf.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/tlv-paper-wu.pdf.
  • Yunus, M., Salehi, H., Sun, C., Yen, J. ,& Li, L. (2011). Using Facebook groups in teaching ESL writing. Recent Researches in Chemistry, Biology, Environment and Culture, 75(1), 75-80. Retrieved from http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2011/Montreux/COMICICBIO/COMICICBIO-11.pdf.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-77f35fe5-4357-4e95-83c5-e609497aa166
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.