2016 | WPS 1/2016 | 1-18
Article title

Does it pay to be good? An analysis of vice and virtue stock performance in the Eurozone

Title variants
Languages of publication
This paper provides a performance analysis of vice and virtue stocks in the Eurozone for the period between January 2005 and December 2014. In order to do so, a vice index is created consisting out of listed Eurozone companies, operating in selected vice industries and is subsequently matched with a corresponding virtue index, which for the purpose of this analysis is represented by the DJSI Eurzone. The tools used to conduct the performance evaluation are the Sharpe ratio, the Capital asset pricing model and the Carhart’s four-factor model. The analysis indicates, no consistent out- or under- performance of one or the other index, yet the realized performance over the whole period favours the vice index. Consequently one can conclude, that from a statistical point of view, there is no substantial advantage or disadvantage in being “good” when investing into stocks, as such it is a matter of investor preference, with the note that historical returns do favour vice stocks.
Physical description
  • University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, Poland
  • Ahmad, A.-R. Y. (2015). Riba, Its Economic Rationale and Implications. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from
  • Becker, G. S. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 5,, 175-192.
  • Bernstein, W. J. (2001). Rolling Your Own: Three-Factor Analysis. Retrieved August 23, 2015, from
  • Carhart, M. M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance 52, 57–82. (2015). Definitions. Retrieved August 20, 2015, from
  • Fama, E. F., & French., K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3–56.
  • French, K. R. (2015). Description of Fama/French European Factors and Portfolios. Retrieved August 15, 2015, from
  • Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of Sin: The Effects of Social Norms on Markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 15-36.
  • Jo, H., Saha, T., Sharma, R., & Wright, S. (2010, March 4). Academic and Business Research Institute Conference - Las Vegas 2010 - Conference Proceedings. Retrieved June 24, 2015, from Socially Responsible Investing vs. Vice Investing:
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 263-291.
  • Lobe, S., & Walkshäusl, C. (2011, May 1). Vice vs. Virtue Investing Around the World. Retrieved July 13, 2015, from SSRN:
  • RBC Global Asset Management. (2012, September 1). Does Socially Responsible Investing Hurt Investment Returns? Retrieved July 2, 2015, from RBC Global Asset Management:
  • Salaber, J. (2007, September 10). The Determinants of Sin Stock Returns: Evidence on the European Market. Retrieved June 30, 2015, from CCSD:
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 425-442. Retrieved from
  • Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Business 39 (S1), 119–138.
  • Sjöström, E. (2011). The Performance of Socially Responsible Investment - A review of scholarly studies published 2008‐2010. Stockholm: AP7. University of Minnesota. (2015). Durbin Watson Test. Retrieved August 30, 2015, from University of Minnesota:
  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.