Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 26/1 | 73-86

Article title

Nicholas Urfe’s Masculine Trap or the Construction of Manhood, its Ambivalences and Limitations in John Fowles’s The Magus

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

Western society and its fi ction faces the overwhelming problem of masculinity and its modeling. The era of war, capitalism, the challenges of feminism aff ect the ideology within which men are constructed both as individuals and as a social group. John Fowles’s fi ction tackles the crucial issue of male power and control as masculinity is put to test and trial in his 1965 novel The Magus. The defi nition of manhood, male virility and social respectability of the period shape the 20th century male characters in Fowles’s fi ction. This paper aims to explore how John Fowles investigates the role of masculinity and power myths on the personal level of relationship and a wider scale of war and capitalism in The Magus. Notions of masculinity off er the protagonist, Nicholas Urfe, a sense of a superiority and power over women in the course of the novel. Among the goals of the project is to examine the mythical journey of Nicholas, which becomes a testing ground of his masculinity and maturity, as well his trial and ‘disintoxication,’ which is intended to help him to reevaluate his life and his relationships with women. One of the issues posed is whether Nicholas Urfe is reborn as a new man at the end of his search for redemption or if he remains the same egotistic, ‘lone wolf’ as he appears in the beginning of the novel.

Keywords

Contributors

author
  • Northeastern State University

References

  • Adams, James Eli. 1995. Dandies and Desert Saints: Styles of Victorian Masculinity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Alderson, David. 1998. Mansex Fine: Religion, Manliness and Imperialism in Nineteen-Century British Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Baron, Ava. 1994. Feminists Revise History. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • Binns, Ronald. 1977. “A New Version of The Magus.” Critical Quarterly 19. 4:79–84.
  • Benton, Sarah. 1983. “Adam and Eve” (Interview with John Fowles). New Socialist11: 18–19.
  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
  • Campbell, Joseph. 1976. “An interview with John Fowles.” Contemporary Literature 17. 4: 455–469.
  • -----. 1973. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • -----. 2005. “Growing up Masculine: Rethinking the Signifi cance of Adolescence in the Making of Masculinities” Irish Journal of Sociology 14. 2: 11–28.
  • Dyer, Richard. 1985. “Male Sexuality and the Media.” Sexuality of Men. Ed. A. Metcalf and M. Humphries. London: Pluto. 28–43.
  • Fowles, John. 1965.The Magus. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • -----. 1978. The Magus: A Revised version. St. Albans: Triad-Panther.
  • -----. 1982a. “Notes on Unfi nished Novel.” The Novel Today. Ed. M. Bradbury. London: Fontana. 146–147.
  • -----. 1982b. “The Falklands and a death foretold.” The Guardian: 7.
  • Frye, Northrop. 2006. The Educated Imagination and Other Writings on Critical Theory 1933-1963. Ed. Germaine Warkentin. Vol. 21. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Hall, D. 1982. “John Fowles’s garden” (interview). Esquire 98: 7.
  • Huff aker, Robert. 1980. John Fowles. Boston, Mass.,: G.K. Hall.
  • -----. 1988. Fowles on Fowles. Actas del X Congresso Nacional de A.E.D.E.A.N.
  • Lorenz, Paul. 1996. “Heraclitus against the Barbarians: John Fowles’s The Magus.” Twentieth Century Literature 42. 1: 69–87.
  • McDaniel, Ellen. 1981–1982. “The Magus: Fowles’s Tarot Quest.” Journal of Modern Literature 8: 247–260.
  • Onega, Susana. 1989. Form and Meaning in the Novels of John Fowles. London: UMI Research Press.
  • Roper, Michael and John Tosh, eds. 1991. Manful Assertions: Masculinities in Britain since 1800. London: Routledge.
  • Stearns, Peter. 1990. ‘Be A Man!’ Males in Modern Society. New York: Holmes and Meier.
  • Tolson, Andrew. 1977. The Limits of Masculinity. London: Tavistock.
  • Wolfe, Peter. 1976. John Fowles, Magus and Moralist. London: Ass. University Press.
  • Woodcock, Bruce. 1984. Male Mythologies, John Fowles and Masculinity. Brighton: The Harvester Press Ltd.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-7941b570-2628-4275-a67c-cf9b5c129a9d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.