PL EN


2013 | 13 | 143-158
Article title

Wartościowanie i wartości w tekście poetyckim (na przykładzie nazw kwiatów w liryce młodej polski)

Title variants
EN
Valuating and values in poetic texts (exemplified by the names of flowers in young Poland’s lyrics)
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The article presents the ways of valuating and the functioning of values in a poetic text. Selected names of flowers appearing in Young Poland’s poetry have been used as the exemplary material. The author aims at indicating how far the general model of valuating, which is established in the standard variety of the Polish language, is reflected in modernistic works, to what extent poetic texts creatively process conventional ways of valuating connected with words referring to flowers, and how far they introduce a reader into a new, or other world of values connected with floral lexis. The analyses presented in the article prove that individual, modernistic ways of valuating the names of flowers and the visions of values connected with flowers differ from those established in the language and culture. Iris, culturally associated with ‘(sophisticated) beauty’, in modernistic poetic texts is a medium of anti-values: ugliness and kitsch; forget-me-not, which is commonly connoted with positively featured ‘memory’, in Young Poland’s lyrics is called a bad weed of memory; rose, stereotypically connected with ‘trans- cendental good’, in poetry from the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries connotes ‘transcendental evil’ and ‘sin’; similar to lily, which conventionally is an image of ‘purity’, ‘innocence’ and ‘virginity’, whereas in Young Poland’s works it evokes ‘eroticism’, ‘passion’, ‘sensual love’ and ‘sin’. The names of flowers in Young Poland’s poetic texts are evaluated by means of different kinds of rhetorical devices and semantic changes: metaphors, personifications, anthropomorphisms, hyperboles, accumulation of epithets, modifications in the connotative sphere of words, as well as categorization, a change of rationality, or symbol exposition, thanks to which traditional valuating of flowers and conventional values connected with them are subject to transformations. In effect of such transformations, valuating becomes ambivalent, positive associations are more often than not destroyed, connotations carrying negative axiological undertone prevail, and values are substituted with anti-values.
Year
Issue
13
Pages
143-158
Physical description
Contributors
References
  • Arct – 1934, M. Arcta Słownik frazeologiczny. Poradnik językowy, Warszawa.
  • Bartmiński J., 2003, Miejsce wartości w językowym obrazie świata, w: Język w kręgu wartości, red. J. Bartmiński, Lublin.
  • Forstner D., 2001, Świat symboliki chrześcijańskiej, Warszawa.
  • Impelluso L., 2006, Natura i jej symbole. Rośliny i zwierzęta, Warszawa.
  • Kopaliński W., 2006, Słownik symboli, Warszawa.
  • Krasn – 1928, Krasnowolski A., Galle H., Słownik frazeologiczny. Poradnik dla piszących, Warszawa.
  • Krzeszowski T., 1999, Aksjologiczne aspekty semantyki językowej, Toruń.
  • Literatura okresu Młodej Polski, 1968, red. A. Hutnikiewicz, t. 1, Warszawa.
  • NKP, 1969–1978, Nowa księga przysłów i wyrażeń przysłowiowych, red. J. Krzyżanowski, S. Świrko, Warszawa.
  • Piekarczyk D., 2004, Kwiaty we współczesnym językowym obrazie świata, Lublin.
  • Puzynina J., 1992, Język wartości, Warszawa.
  • Puzynina J., 1997, Słowo – wartość – kultura, Lublin.
  • SF – 1967, Skorupka S., Słownik frazeologiczny, t. 1–2, Warszawa.
  • Sikora I., 1987, Symbolika kwiatów w poezji Młodej Polski, Szczecin.
  • SL – 1854–1860, Linde S. B., Słownik języka polskiego, Lwów.
  • SWil – 1861, Słownik języka polskiego, red. M. Orgelbrand, Wilno.
  • Wyka K., 2003, Młoda Polska, t. 1, Kraków.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-7973ecc6-b03c-4056-a565-77fbc1c108f0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.