2018 | 18 | 1 | 77-92
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
The study was conducted to find out what impact a digital game had on students’ learning performance and motivation. A quasi-experimental study was performed with two groups of students. The experimental group was taught using the digital game Kahoot whereas the control group was taught with the conventional method. Pre-tests, post-tests, and questionnaires on the students’ motivation and attitudes toward gamification in language learning were the instruments used in this study. The data were analyzed using Independent t-tests and One-way Analysis of Covariance. The results revealed statistically significant differences with regard to learning performance and motivation at 0.05. The experimental group obtained higher scores than the control group, and the motivation of students in the experimental group was much higher than that of the control group. In addition, the results of a survey indicated that students had positive attitudes towards application of digital games in language learning.
Physical description
  • Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computer & Education, 83, 57-63.
  • Burke, B. (2014). Gamify: How Gamification Motivates People to Do Extraordinary Things. Brookline, MA: Bibliomotion Incorporated.
  • Byrne, R. (2013). Free technology for teachers: Kahoot! - create quizzes and surveys your students can answer
  • on any device, Retrieved 17 January 2016 from
  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages.
  • Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
  • Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary
  • Education Psychology, 27, 270-295.
  • Chou, Y. (2015). What is gamification? Retrieved 3 January 2016 from
  • Connolly, T. M., Stansfield, M., & Hainey, T. (2011). An alternate reality game for language learning: ARGuing
  • for multilingual motivation. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1389-1415.
  • Deterding, S. (2011). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. A workshop at CHI 2011 Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts. Retrieved 24 February 2016 from
  • Domínguez, A., de Navarrete, J., de Marcos, L., L. Fernández- Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. Retrieved 5 May 2016 from
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and Researching Motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Ebrahimzadeh, M., & Alavi, S. (2017). The effect of digital video games on EFL students’ language learning motivation. Teaching English with Technology, 17(2), 87-112. Retrieved 22 September 2016 from
  • Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom report systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.
  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20.
  • Goehle, G. (2013). Gamification and web-based homework. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 23(3), 234-246.
  • Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2000) Looking in Classrooms (8th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
  • Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2015). The effect of achievement badges on students’ behavior: An empirical study in a university-level computer science course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(1), 18-28.
  • Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification, Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 2014.
  • Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161.
  • Heaslip, G., Donovan, P., & Cullen, J. G. (2014). Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 11-24. Retrieved 28 September 2016 from
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
  • Icard, S. B. (2014). Educational technology best practices. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 11(3), 37-41. Retrieved 15 December 2016 from
  • Kapp, K. M. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. San Francisco: Wiley.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development,10(3), 2-10.
  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8, 13-24.
  • Kim, B. (2015, Feb/Mar). Designing gamification in the right way. Library Technology Reports, 51(2), 29-35.
  • Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.
  • Landers, R. N. (2015). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752-768.
  • Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. Retrieved 4 May 2016 from
  • Leaning, M. (2015). A study of the use of games and gamification to enhance student engagement, experience and achievement on a theory-based course of an undergraduate media degree. Journal of Media Practice, 16(2), 155-170.
  • Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: what, how, why bother? Definitions and uses. Exchange Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 15(2), 1-5. Retrieved 18 October 2016 from
  • Marklund, B.B., & Alklind Taylor, A.S. (2016). Educational games in practice: The challenges involved in conducting a game-based curriculum. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(2), 122-121. Retrieved 28 February 2016 from
  • McMahon, B., & Portelli, J. P. (2004). Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 59-76. Retrieved 2 May 2016 from
  • Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification, Proceedings, The 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL 2012 (pp. 323–329). Retrieved 11 October 2016 from
  • Oblinger, D. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8, 1-18.
  • Poondej, C., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2016). The development of gamified learning activities to increase student engagement in learning. Australian Educational Computing, 31(1), 1-16. Retrieved 22 October 2016 from
  • Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149-172). New York: Springer.
  • Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2013). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Simões, J., Díaz Redondo, R., & Fernández Vilas, R. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 345-353.
  • Thomas, C. (2014). Kahoot! Retrieved 16 March 2016 from
  • Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J., … Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 40, 217-266.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.