Directive on Antitrust Damages Actions and Current Changes of Slovak Competition and Civil Law

• Authors: Blazo Ondrej
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Slovak competition law enforcement can be characterized by infrequency of leniency applications and near absence of private enforcement. As a result, the adoption of the Damages Directive is not likely to cause substantial breakthrough in Slovakia, be it with respect to the rate of leniency applications or in private enforcement. A comprehensive amendment of Slovak competition law took place in 2014. Changes introduced therein reflected, among other things, the practice of the European Commission regarding access to its file. A new approach was also introduced towards damages claims submitted against leniency applicants. The paper will first consider the question whether it is necessary to further redesign these new Slovak rules because of the adoption of the Damages Directive, or if they have been successfully pre-harmonized. Along with changes to Slovak competition law, procedural rules for civil courts were also re-codified. Hence the second part of this analysis will focus on the question if a new civil procedure framework, including obligatory harmonization, could foster private enforcement of competition law. Summarizing the resulting answers, the third question focuses on who could benefit from further changes to Slovak legislation – final consumers or enterprises that are involved in the production chain. Finally, will changes in Slovak legislation driven by the Directive be coherent with its overall legal system, or will they appear to be an odd and peculiar piece of legislation?

Keywords

EN

competition law; Directive 2014/104/EU; Slovakia; civil law; commercial law; reform of competition law; leniency programme; settlement; procedural law

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 8(12)
• Pages: 259-272

Dates

published

2015-12-31

Contributors

author

Blazo Ondrej

• Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law, Institute of European Law

References

• Bejček J., ‘Vybrané ekonomické a právní aspekty náhrady škody v rámci soukromého vymáhání soutěžního práva’ [‘Selected Economic and Legal Aspects of Damages in Private Enforcement Actions’] [in:] Súkromnoprávne vymáhanie súťažného práva [Private Enforcement of the Competition Law], Bratislava 2010.
• Janáč V., Kurilovská L., Hospodárska súťaž a jej ochrana v trestnom práve [Economic competition and its protection by criminal law], (2011) 3(94) Právny obzor.
• Kalesná K., Blažo O., Zákon o ochrane hospodárskej súťaže. Komentár [Act on Protection of Economic Competition. Commentary], Praha 2012
• Králičková B., Súkromnoprávne aspekty protimonopolného práva [Private-law enforcement of anti-monopoly law], Bratislava 2012.
• Králik A., Náhrada škody spôsobenej porušením súťažného práva [Compensation of damage caused by infringement of competition law ], Bratislava 2014.
• Šramelová S., ‘Kolektívne žaloby pri súkromnoprávnom vymáhaní súťažného práva’ [‘Collective Actions in Private Enforcement of Competition Law’] (2010) II Notitiae ex Academia Bratislavensi Iurisprudentiae.

Identifiers

ISSN

1689-9024