Putnam et al’s Making Democracy Work: A Re-Examination in Cross-National Perspective

• Authors: Rosa Valentim , Marilia Patta Ramos , Carlos Águedo Nagel Paiva
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

The objective of this article is to provide a critical evaluation of the empirical analysis in Robert Putnam et al’s (2005) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. We propose new measurements of the major concepts and also incorporate information about income inequality as a factor in the determination of institutional and economic performance, all in cross-national perspective. This article has two concerns. Substantively, the research question posed is: what is the impact of the distribution of income on civic community, institutional performance and economic performance? We hypothesize that an equitable distribution of income leads to the development of a civic community, which in turn leads to institutional and socioeconomic performance. Methodologically, we consider the difficulties that arise examining this hypothesis in cross-national perspective, as well as proposed solutions, especially with regards to data harmonization and measuring the main concepts. The database of the World Values Survey (WVS) was used to test this hypothesis. The sample includes 49 countries that participated in the survey. Our re¬examination synthesizes aspects of Putnam et al’s book with the methodology of Knack and Keefer’s (1997) Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A key finding is that civism and active participation in organizations and associations, taken individually, have a negative effect on the determination of economic performance and consequently on institutional performance, a finding that differs from the results of Putnam et al (2005). The distribution of income had a negative and significant effect on economic performance in the sense that in countries where income inequality is greater, economic performance was proportionally lower. This article proposes an analysis that focused more on economic factors than the analysis proposed by Putnam et al.

Keywords

EN

civic community; institutional performance; economic performance; socioeconomic development; income inequality

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: ASK. Research and Methods
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 22
• Pages: 79-101

Contributors

author

Rosa Valentim

• Department of Economics, Santa Cruz do Sul University, Avenida Independência, 2293, 96815-900 Santa Cruz do Sul – Rs – Brazil

author

Marilia Patta Ramos

• Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Brasil, Rua Attilio Bilibio 120 Casa 107, 91530-008, Porto Alegre - Rs - Brasil

author

Carlos Águedo Nagel Paiva

• Economics and Statistics Foundation (FEE), Brazil

References

• Boomsma, A. 1982. “Robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models.” In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, Vol. 1 (pp. 149–173). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• Boomsma, A. 1985. “Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation.” Psychometrika, 50, 229–242.
• European Values Survey – EVS. 2000. Available at: www.ucd.ie/issda/dataset-info/evs. htm. Accessed January 5, 2009.
• Gerbing, D. W., and Anderson, J. C. 1987. “Improper solutions in the analysis of covariance structures: Their interpretability and a comparison of alternate respecification.” Psychometrika, 52, 99–111.
• Gujarati, D. N. 2000. Econometria básica. São Paulo: Makron Books.
• Knack, S and Keefer, P. 1997. “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 112, n. 4 pp. 1251-1288.
• Marsh, H. W., and O’Neill, R. 1984. “Self Description Questionnaire III (SDQIII): The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late-adolescents.” Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174.
• Maccallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., and Hong, S. (1999). “Sample size in factor analysis.” Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
• Paiva, C. A. N. 2004. “Capital social, comunidade, democracia e o planejamento no RS: uma avaliação de suas possibilidades à luz da história.” In: Wittmann, M. L. and Ramos, M. P. (eds.) Desenvolvimento regional: capital social, redes e planejamento. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC.
• Putnam et al, Robert D.; Leonardi, R.; Nanetti, R.Y. 2005. Comunidade e democracia: a experiência da Itália moderna. 4 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da FGV.
• Ramos, M. P. and Marino, J. M. F. “Condicionantes históricos do desenvolvimento capitalista global em nível regional.” In: Wittmann, M. L. and Ramos, M. P. (eds.) Desenvolvimento regional: capital social, redes e planejamento. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC, 2004.
• Solt, F. Home page. Available at: www.siuc.edu/~fsolt/. Accessed on: July 16th. 2009. Velicer, W. F., and Fava, J. L. 1998. “Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery.” Psychological Methods, 3, 231–251.
• You, J.S. 2005. “Corruption and Inequality as Correlates of Social Trust: Fairness Matters More Than Similarity.” J F Working Paper Series. Harvard University, 2005. Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/hauser/PDF_XLS/workingpapers/ workingpaper_29.pdf. Accessed on : January 13th. 2009.
• World Values Survey – WVS 2005 Offical Data File. 2008. World Values Survey Asso¬ciation Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. Available in: worldvaluesur¬vey.org. Accessed on: January 5, 2009.
• World Values Survey – WVS 2005 Offical Data File. 1980. World Values Survey Association Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. Available in: http:worldvaluesurvey.org. Accessed on: January 5. 2009.
• World Values Survey – WVS 2005 Offical Data File. 1990. World Values Survey Association Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. Available at: worldvaluesurvey.org. Accessed on: January 5. 2009.